12.07.2015 Views

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>: A <strong>Call</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Action</strong>RecommendationsOur headline advice has been summarized inthe Framework for <strong>Action</strong> and associatedGuiding Principles sections above. What followsare detailed statements of our recommendations,organized in response <strong>to</strong> the three specificquestions in the Panel’s mandate.Program EffectivenessThe first question in the Panel’s mandate asks:What federal initiatives are most effective inincreasing business R&D and facilitatingcommercially relevant R&D partnerships?The government regularly evaluates individualprograms against the stated objectives of eachprogram. But these objectives vary widelyamong programs in terms of the outcomesbeing targeted, and the evaluation datacollected for individual programs have generallynot been designed <strong>to</strong> enable assessment of thecomparative effectiveness of programs. Ouradvice in respect of program effectiveness istherefore based not only on available dataregarding the 60 programs we reviewed butalso, and more particularly, on our consultationsand related research.From what we heard and learned, there is aneed <strong>to</strong> improve the business expertise ofprogram delivery staff and <strong>to</strong> achieve greaterscale and efficiency in program implementation.We have concluded that SMEs need enhancedaccess <strong>to</strong> services and small grant or voucherbasedfunding <strong>to</strong> assist their innovationactivities. We found that the bewildering arrayof innovation support programs (at both thefederal and provincial levels) made it difficult forcompanies <strong>to</strong> navigate the landscape <strong>to</strong> locatethe right programs for their purposes.Our survey of R&D-performing firmsdemonstrated that client awareness of mostprograms is low (with the exception of theSR&ED program and IRAP). We also found thatthe current suite of programs <strong>to</strong> develop anddeploy the talent needed <strong>to</strong> meet the needs ofinnovative businesses is a patchwork of largelysubscale initiatives. More generally, we foundthat there are opportunities <strong>to</strong> improve programefficiency and flexibility by combining smallerinitiatives with similar objectives. Finally, weconcluded that adequate <strong>to</strong>ols do not exist <strong>to</strong>comparatively assess relative programeffectiveness. Therefore, the evidence base islacking for a regular and systematic reallocationof resources among programs <strong>to</strong> achieve themost cost-effective support for businessinnovation.Based on these findings, as detailed inChapter 5 of our main report, we make thefollowing recommendations.E-8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!