Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Innovation Canada: A Call to ActionCentre for the Study of Living Standards. 2011b. Database of Information and CommunicationTechnology (ICT) Investment and Capital Stock Trends: Canada vs United States. Ottawa: CSLS.Database accessed July 2011. http://www.csls.ca/data/ict.aspCompetition Policy Review Panel. 2008. Compete to Win: Final Report — June 2008. Ottawa: PublicWorks and Government Services Canada.Council of Canadian Academies. 2006. The State of Science & Technology in Canada. TheCommittee on the State of Science & Technology in Canada. Ottawa: CCA.Council of Canadian Academies. 2009. Innovation and Business Strategy: Why Canada Falls Short.Report of the Expert Panel on Business Innovation. Ottawa: CCA.Cumming, Douglas J. and Jeffrey G. MacIntosh. 2006. “Crowding Out Private Equity: CanadianEvidence.” Pages 569–609 in Journal of Business Venturing 21 (5). Elsevier Inc.Department of Finance. 2007. The Budget Plan 2007: Aspire to a Stronger, Safer, Better Canada.Ottawa: Department of Finance.Department of Finance. 2008. The Budget Plan 2008: Responsible Leadership. Ottawa: Departmentof Finance.Department of Finance. 2009. Tax Expenditures and Evaluations 2009. Ottawa: Department ofFinance.Department of Finance. 2010a. Budget 2010: Leading the Way on Jobs and Growth. Ottawa:Department of Finance.Department of Finance. 2010b. Tax Expenditures and Evaluations 2010. Ottawa: Department ofFinance.Department of Finance. 2011. The Next Phase of Canada’s Economic Action Plan: A Low-Tax Plan forJobs and Growth. Ottawa: Department of Finance.Desjardins, Louise and Darren King. 2011. Expectations and Labour Market Outcomes of DoctoralGraduates from Canadian Universities. Research Paper: Culture, Tourism and the Centre forEducation Statistics. Cat. no. 81-595-M — No. 089. Ottawa: Statistics Canada and Human Resourcesand Skills Development Canada.Duruflé, Gilles. 2009. Why Venture Capital Is Essential to the Canadian Economy: The Impact ofVenture Capital on the Canadian Economy. Toronto: Canada’s Venture Capital & Private EquityAssociation.Expert Panel on Commercialization. 2006a. People and Excellence: The Heart of SuccessfulCommercialization. Volume I: Final Report of the Expert Panel on Commercialization. Ottawa: PublicWorks and Government Services Canada.Expert Panel on Commercialization. 2006b. People and Excellence: The Heart of SuccessfulCommercialization. Volume II: Supporting Material. Ottawa: Public Works and GovernmentServices Canada.Finland. Ministry of Education and Ministry of Employment and the Economy. 2009. Evaluation of theFinnish National Innovation System. Helsinki: The Ministries.R-2
ReferencesGu, Wulong and Amélie Lafrance. 2010. “Productivity Growth in Canadian and US RegulatedIndustries.” Pages 50–65 in International Productivity Monitor 19, Spring 2010. Ottawa: Centre forthe Study of Living Standards.Institute for Competitiveness & Prosperity. 2010. Beyond the Recovery: Report on Canada 2010.Toronto: The Institute for Competitiveness & Prosperity.Lerner, Josh. 2009. Boulevard of Broken Dreams: Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship andVenture Capital Have Failed and What to Do about It. Kauffman Foundation Series on Innovation andEntrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Lynch, Kevin and Munir A. Sheikh. 2011. “Innovation Dividend = Stronger Productivity Growth.”Pages 22–30 in Policy Options 32 (8), Spring 2011. Montréal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.Miner, Rick. 2010. People without Jobs, Jobs without People: Ontario’s Labour Market Future.Toronto: Miner & Miner Management Consultants.National Venture Capital Association. 2008. “Economic Troubles Could Impact Returns in 2008.”Press Release, April 28, 2008. http://www.nvca.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=59&Itemid=317&limitstart=20Nicholson, Peter. 2011. Productivity Growth in Canada: The Role of Innovation and Business Strategy.Presentation to the Advanced Leadership Program, Ottawa, May 31, 2011.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. Frascati Manual: ProposedStandard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2010a. Measuring Innovation: A NewPerspective. Paris: OECD.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2010b. Science, Technology and IndustryOutlook 2010. Paris: OECD.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. Main Science and TechnologyIndicators: 2011/1 edition. Paris: OECD.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Forthcoming. Business InnovationPolicies: Selected Country Comparisons. Paris: OECD.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Eurostat. 2005. Oslo Manual:Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed. Paris: OECD.Parsons, Mark and Nicholas Phillips. 2007. An Evaluation of the Federal Tax Credit for ScientificResearch and Experimental Development. Working paper no. 2007-08. Ottawa: Department ofFinance.PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2011. “SR&ED Tax Clips: 2010 Provincial and Territorial R&D Tax Credits(July 15, 2010).” http://www.pwc.com/ca/en/sred/tax-clips/provincial-territorial-tax-credits-property-1998-2010.jhtmlSamarasekera, Indira V. 2009. “Universities Need a New Social Contract.” Pages 160–161 inNature 462, November 12, 2009.R-3
Page 1 and 2:
Innovation Canada:A Call to ActionR
Page 3 and 4:
Innovation Canada:A Call to Action
Page 5:
Dear Minister,Please find attached
Page 8 and 9:
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 35 and 36:
The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
Page 37 and 38:
The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
Page 39 and 40:
The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
Page 41 and 42:
The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
Page 43 and 44:
The Context of the ReviewInnovation
Page 45 and 46:
The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
Page 47 and 48:
The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
Page 49 and 50:
The Context of the ReviewProsperity
Page 51 and 52:
The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
Page 53:
The Context of the Review%115110105
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 69 and 70:
Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
Page 71 and 72:
Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
Page 73 and 74:
Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
Page 75 and 76:
Program Effectivenessand processes.
Page 77 and 78:
Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
Page 79 and 80:
Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
Page 81 and 82:
Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Sat
Page 83 and 84:
Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operat
Page 85 and 86:
Program Effectivenessassessment of
Page 87 and 88:
Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
Page 89 and 90:
Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
Page 91 and 92:
Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
Page 93 and 94:
Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
Page 107 and 108: Filling the GapsBox 7.1 Use of Proc
Page 109 and 110: Filling the GapsBox 7.2 Canadian In
Page 111 and 112: Filling the Gapscompetitive levels,
Page 113 and 114: Filling the GapsBox 7.4 Institutes
Page 115 and 116: Filling the GapsThe budgetary impli
Page 117 and 118: Filling the GapsSuch concerns are i
Page 119 and 120: Filling the GapsAngel InvestmentAt
Page 121 and 122: Filling the GapsWith the foregoing
Page 123 and 124: Filling the GapsBearing this in min
Page 125 and 126: Leadership for InnovationChapterLea
Page 127 and 128: Leadership for InnovationThe approp
Page 129 and 130: Leadership for Innovationinnovation
Page 131 and 132: ConclusionChapterConclusion9We are
Page 133 and 134: Programs in the ReviewAnnexPrograms
Page 135: Programs in the ReviewDepartment or
Page 138 and 139: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Page 148: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
show all

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?