Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
The Advice of Other PanelsAnnexThe Advice of OtherPanelsBIn recent years, the federal government hasstruck panels that have touched upon issues ofrelevance to the Review of Federal Support toResearch and Development. In particular, theCompetition Policy Review Panel and the ExpertPanel on Commercialization both exploredtopics that warrant attention in the context ofthis review.Competition Policy ReviewPanel (2008)The formation of the Competition Policy ReviewPanel was announced jointly by the ministers ofIndustry and Finance in July 2007. The panelwas mandated to review Canada’s competitionand foreign investment policies, and to providerelated recommendations on how to improveCanada’s productivity and competitiveness.In its final report, Compete to Win, releasedin June 2008, the panel recommended theestablishment of an independent CanadianCompetitiveness Council under the Minister ofIndustry. Staffed by a chief executive officer anda small core staff overseen by a board ofdirectors, the proposed council’s mandate wouldbe “to examine and report on, advocate formeasures to improve, and to ensure sustainedprogress on, Canadian competitiveness”(p. 133). It would not enforce laws andregulations but would have a public voice,including the power to publish and advocate forits findings. The Competition Policy ReviewPanel also put forward a range of otherrecommendations grouped under variousrubrics, two of which stand out as particularlypertinent to this review.Innovation and Intellectual PropertyThe report made the followingrecommendations (2008, p. 133).“The federal government should monitor thescientific research and experimentaldevelopment tax credit program annually inorder to ensure that business investment inresearch and development and innovation inCanada is effectively encouraged.As a matter of priority, the federalgovernment should ensure that newcopyright legislation will both sufficientlyreward creators while stimulating competitionand innovation in the Internet age. Anyprospective changes to Canada’s patent lawregime should also reflect this balance. Thefederal government should assess andmodernize the Canadian patent andcopyright system to support the internationalefforts of Canadian participants in the globaleconomy in a timely and effective manner.Before December 2009, the federalgovernment should strengthen counterfeitand piracy laws to ensure that intellectualproperty rights are effectively protected.A-5
- Page 85 and 86: Program Effectivenessassessment of
- Page 87 and 88: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
- Page 89 and 90: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
- Page 91 and 92: Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
- Page 93 and 94: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
- Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
- Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
- Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
- Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
- Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
- Page 107 and 108: Filling the GapsBox 7.1 Use of Proc
- Page 109 and 110: Filling the GapsBox 7.2 Canadian In
- Page 111 and 112: Filling the Gapscompetitive levels,
- Page 113 and 114: Filling the GapsBox 7.4 Institutes
- Page 115 and 116: Filling the GapsThe budgetary impli
- Page 117 and 118: Filling the GapsSuch concerns are i
- Page 119 and 120: Filling the GapsAngel InvestmentAt
- Page 121 and 122: Filling the GapsWith the foregoing
- Page 123 and 124: Filling the GapsBearing this in min
- Page 125 and 126: Leadership for InnovationChapterLea
- Page 127 and 128: Leadership for InnovationThe approp
- Page 129 and 130: Leadership for Innovationinnovation
- Page 131 and 132: ConclusionChapterConclusion9We are
- Page 133 and 134: Programs in the ReviewAnnexPrograms
- Page 135: Programs in the ReviewDepartment or
- Page 139 and 140: The Advice of Other PanelsExpert Pa
- Page 141 and 142: Biographies of Panel MembersAnnexBi
- Page 143 and 144: Biographies of Panel Memberscommitt
- Page 145 and 146: ReferencesReferencesBaldwin, John a
- Page 147 and 148: ReferencesGu, Wulong and Amélie La
The Advice of Other PanelsAnnexThe Advice of OtherPanelsBIn recent years, the federal government hasstruck panels that have <strong>to</strong>uched upon issues ofrelevance <strong>to</strong> the Review of Federal Support <strong>to</strong>Research and Development. In particular, theCompetition Policy Review Panel and the ExpertPanel on Commercialization both explored<strong>to</strong>pics that warrant attention in the context ofthis review.Competition Policy ReviewPanel (2008)The formation of the Competition Policy ReviewPanel was announced jointly by the ministers ofIndustry and Finance in July 2007. The panelwas mandated <strong>to</strong> review <strong>Canada</strong>’s competitionand foreign investment policies, and <strong>to</strong> providerelated recommendations on how <strong>to</strong> improve<strong>Canada</strong>’s productivity and competitiveness.In its final report, Compete <strong>to</strong> Win, releasedin June 2008, the panel recommended theestablishment of an independent CanadianCompetitiveness Council under the Minister ofIndustry. Staffed by a chief executive officer anda small core staff overseen by a board ofdirec<strong>to</strong>rs, the proposed council’s mandate wouldbe “<strong>to</strong> examine and report on, advocate formeasures <strong>to</strong> improve, and <strong>to</strong> ensure sustainedprogress on, Canadian competitiveness”(p. 133). It would not enforce laws andregulations but would have a public voice,including the power <strong>to</strong> publish and advocate forits findings. The Competition Policy ReviewPanel also put forward a range of otherrecommendations grouped under variousrubrics, two of which stand out as particularlypertinent <strong>to</strong> this review.<strong>Innovation</strong> and Intellectual PropertyThe report made the followingrecommendations (2008, p. 133).“The federal government should moni<strong>to</strong>r thescientific research and experimentaldevelopment tax credit program annually inorder <strong>to</strong> ensure that business investment inresearch and development and innovation in<strong>Canada</strong> is effectively encouraged.As a matter of priority, the federalgovernment should ensure that newcopyright legislation will both sufficientlyreward crea<strong>to</strong>rs while stimulating competitionand innovation in the Internet age. Anyprospective changes <strong>to</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>’s patent lawregime should also reflect this balance. Thefederal government should assess andmodernize the Canadian patent andcopyright system <strong>to</strong> support the internationalefforts of Canadian participants in the globaleconomy in a timely and effective manner.Before December 2009, the federalgovernment should strengthen counterfeitand piracy laws <strong>to</strong> ensure that intellectualproperty rights are effectively protected.A-5