Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Innovation Canada: A Call to ActionFigure 7.3 Proposal to Support High-Growth Firms$10M +Later StageVenture CapitalPublic MarketsMergers & Acquisitions$1M to$10MEarly StageVenture Capital$100Kto $1MBusiness AngelsAngel GroupsUp to$200K“Friends & Family”Government / universitiesSeed Prototypes Start-up Other EarlyStageLater stage/ExpansionMatureSidecar fundwith angelinvestorsthroughBDCNew capital for BDC tohelp develop late stageand growth equity fundsin support ofprivate industrySource: The Panel.The market should determine theallocation of financing. Governmentsshould co-invest with private venturecapitalists and allow the private investors todetermine the investment strategy. For this towork, a substantial amount of funds shouldcome from non-public sources, and thegovernment cannot micromanage the fundsin terms of investment location and types ofinvestment. It is important to allow fundmanagers to develop strong linkages toglobal experts, markets and businesses.Additional support for the industry hasto be paced in recognition of limits onthe supply of talented and experiencedmanagers as well as on the supply ofhigh-quality firms needing financing.While there is a minimum scale ofintervention required for effectiveness, careshould be exercised not to exceed thecapacity of the industry to successfullymanage the additional funds. As for otherprograms, the capacity to evaluate outcomesshould be built in and the government shouldbe prepared to make adjustments to improveperformance, while at the same time avoidingrules that cause fund managers to focusexcessively on short-term results.7-18
Filling the GapsBearing this in mind, the Panel recommendsthat the BDC set up a national angel investment“sidecar” fund — that is, a pool of committedcapital that “rides along with” or investsfollowing the lead of an investment group.Working with groups (instead of individuals)results in economies of scale and promoteshigher-quality investments through access to abroader range of expertise. BDC’s contributionto the fund would come from its existingresources, with each dollar of BDC fundingmatched by at least 50 cents in funding fromangel groups, although the appropriate fundingratio is likely to vary by sector. In order toencourage adequate participation, it may benecessary to provide an attractive financialstructure to secure private/institutional partnersand to induce private sector fund managers toinvest in high-growth, innovative Canadianfirms. One option is for the government to offerits partners a leveraged return in exchange fortaking on more risk. This approach has beenadopted by a number of countries.The New Zealand Venture InvestmentFund, the Russian Venture Company andthe new Israeli Heznek Fund (all of whichwere inspired by Israel’s The Yozma Groupfund) give private sector partners an option(but not the requirement) to purchase thegovernment’s position after a certain lengthof time at a price that would generate apredetermined rate of return to thegovernment. With this structure, thegovernment is exposed to the same downsiderisk as in a standard co-investment model,but has less upside potential, which reducesthe expected return on its investment.Nevertheless, if market forces areappropriately harnessed to allocate funding,the government should be able to obtain apositive return on its investment. Thisapproach raises the expected return to privateinvestors without affecting the risk of loss. Ittherefore helps align private incentives withthe public interest by giving the fundmanagers an incentive to invest in firms thathave substantial upside potential rather thanusing government funds to offset losses onpoor investments. Fund managers also havean incentive to work closely with fundedcompanies because, once the minimumreturn has been achieved, fund managers areable to keep all of the additional return fromtheir extra effort.In the US, the Small Business InvestmentCompany (SBIC) program lends money toventure capitalists. The interest on thegovernment loan is paid semi-annually andthe principal must be repaid before capital isreturned to private investors. Thesearrangements increase both the expectedreturn and the risk for private investors. Thegovernment faces some risk: if the fundperforms poorly enough, the loan principalwill not be repaid.Enterprise Capital Funds in the UK haveadopted a variant on the SBIC approach, withthe government absorbing more of the risk ofloss and gain by accepting repayment ofcapital on an equal footing with its partnersand negotiating a share of the profits.To improve access to later-stage venture capital,the Panel recommends having the governmentinvest in private sector funds on terms thatencourage larger fund sizes. The current state ofthe risk capital market suggests that thegovernment may have to adopt a financialstructure that encourages private/institutionalco-investment by improving the risk–rewardtrade-off these investors face, as discussedabove. The government should establish fundswith the intention of leveraging private fundson at least a dollar-for-dollar basis.The intention is not to create one large fund;rather, it is to encourage more and larger privatefunds supporting late-stage venture capital.Interviews with fund managers indicate that,while the optimal fund size varies by sector,larger fund sizes are more efficient because7-19
Page 1 and 2:
Innovation Canada:A Call to ActionR
Page 3 and 4:
Innovation Canada:A Call to Action
Page 5:
Dear Minister,Please find attached
Page 8 and 9:
Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 35 and 36:
The Context of the ReviewChapterThe
Page 37 and 38:
The Context of the Reviewspreads wi
Page 39 and 40:
The Context of the ReviewBox 2.2 De
Page 41 and 42:
The Context of the ReviewIn absolut
Page 43 and 44:
The Context of the ReviewInnovation
Page 45 and 46:
The Context of the Reviewdevelopmen
Page 47 and 48:
The Context of the ReviewBox 2.4 Wh
Page 49 and 50:
The Context of the ReviewProsperity
Page 51 and 52:
The Context of the ReviewFigure 2.6
Page 53:
The Context of the Review%115110105
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 69 and 70:
Vision and PrinciplesChapterVision
Page 71 and 72: Vision and Principlesout in Chapter
Page 73 and 74: Program EffectivenessChapterProgram
Page 75 and 76: Program Effectivenessand processes.
Page 77 and 78: Program Effectivenessfull spectrum
Page 79 and 80: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.2 Rea
Page 81 and 82: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.4 Sat
Page 83 and 84: Program EffectivenessBox 5.1 Operat
Page 85 and 86: Program Effectivenessassessment of
Page 87 and 88: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.5 Dir
Page 89 and 90: Program EffectivenessFigure 5.6 Per
Page 91 and 92: Program Mix and DesignChapterProgra
Page 93 and 94: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.1 Direc
Page 95 and 96: Program Mix and Designthe needs of
Page 97 and 98: Program Mix and DesignFigure 6.3 Ta
Page 99 and 100: Program Mix and DesignBox 6.3 Stack
Page 101 and 102: Program Mix and Designcapital costs
Page 103 and 104: Program Mix and Designportion of th
Page 105 and 106: Filling the GapsChapterFilling the
Page 107 and 108: Filling the GapsBox 7.1 Use of Proc
Page 109 and 110: Filling the GapsBox 7.2 Canadian In
Page 111 and 112: Filling the Gapscompetitive levels,
Page 113 and 114: Filling the GapsBox 7.4 Institutes
Page 115 and 116: Filling the GapsThe budgetary impli
Page 117 and 118: Filling the GapsSuch concerns are i
Page 119 and 120: Filling the GapsAngel InvestmentAt
Page 121: Filling the GapsWith the foregoing
Page 125 and 126: Leadership for InnovationChapterLea
Page 127 and 128: Leadership for InnovationThe approp
Page 129 and 130: Leadership for Innovationinnovation
Page 131 and 132: ConclusionChapterConclusion9We are
Page 133 and 134: Programs in the ReviewAnnexPrograms
Page 135: Programs in the ReviewDepartment or
Page 138 and 139: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
Page 148: Innovation Canada: A Call to Action
show all

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?