12.07.2015 Views

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Filling the GapsWith the foregoing in mind, the Panel isrecommending programs <strong>to</strong> facilitate investmentin the two parts of the risk capital market wherethe most crucial gaps exist: angel investment andlate-stage venture capital and growth equity.Recommendation 5Help high-growth innovative firmsaccess the risk capital they needthrough the establishment of newfunds where gaps exist.The Vision of the PanelInnovative, growing firms require risk capital, yet<strong>to</strong>o many innovative Canadian firms that havethe potential for high growth are unable <strong>to</strong>access the funding needed <strong>to</strong> realize theirpotential. The Government of <strong>Canada</strong> can playan important role by facilitating access by suchfirms <strong>to</strong> an increased supply of risk capital.Getting ThereTo realize this vision, the Panel recommends thefollowing.5.1 Start-up stage — Direct the BusinessDevelopment Bank of <strong>Canada</strong> (BDC) <strong>to</strong>allocate a larger proportion of its portfolio<strong>to</strong> start-up stage financing, preferably inthe form of a “sidecar” fund with angelinves<strong>to</strong>r groups.5.2 Late stage — Provide the BDC with newcapital <strong>to</strong> support the development oflarger-scale, later-stage venture capitalfunds and growth equity funds in suppor<strong>to</strong>f the private venture capital and equityindustry. These funds would specialize indeal sizes of $10 million and above that aremanaged by the private sec<strong>to</strong>r and subject<strong>to</strong> appropriate governance practices.The foregoing recommendations, depicted inFigure 7.3, reflect the Panel’s views on wherethe weaknesses in the financing chain arefound. However, as pointed out by Josh Lerner,a respected US analyst of the venture capitalmarket, government intervention has <strong>to</strong> becarefully structured in order <strong>to</strong> be effective(Lerner 2009). 11 The recommendations aretherefore developed with the followingconsiderations in mind.Government intervention should bestructured <strong>to</strong> address market failures and<strong>to</strong> create a net benefit for society. Thepurpose of intervening in the venture capitalmarket is <strong>to</strong> improve rates of return onfinancial capital through a reallocation amongsec<strong>to</strong>rs. The purpose is not <strong>to</strong> subsidize theproduction of R&D — that is the role of R&Dsupport programs. As a result, if marketforces are appropriately harnessed <strong>to</strong> allocatefunding, successful intervention will notrequire a large subsidy. In mostcircumstances, the government will be able <strong>to</strong>make a positive return on its investment.Setting up appropriate governance structuresfor the funds is an important determinant oftheir effectiveness and will help ensure thatthe intervention generates a net economicbenefit. Governance structures have <strong>to</strong> becarefully developed <strong>to</strong> ensure that privateincentives are appropriately aligned with thepublic interest and that the scope for selfservingbehaviour is constrained.11 The title of Lerner’s recent book on venture capital is highly revealing — Boulevard of Broken Dreams — and the subtitleeven more so — Why Public Efforts <strong>to</strong> Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed and What <strong>to</strong> Do about It.7-17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!