Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

Innovation Canada: A Call to Action Innovation Canada: A Call to Action

sedi2.esteri.it
from sedi2.esteri.it More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Innovation Canada: A Call to Actiondirect support measures benefiting SMEs, asrecommended in other chapters of this report.It is also important to note that about 650newly-created start-ups apply for SR&ED creditsfor the first time each year. Lack of adequatefinancing is a constraint on the growth of moststart-ups, and the current SR&ED tax credithelps to address this problem through the35-percent refundable tax credit. Ourrecommendations will provide start-ups, as wellas established SMEs, with a wider range ofsupport to help them bring their innovations tomarket through an expanded IRAP program, anew commercialization vouchers pilot program,a new concierge service, greater access to ahighly skilled and entrepreneurial workforce,enhanced procurement programming, andimproved access to risk capital at the start-upand later stages of growth. While the enhanceddirect support measures that we arerecommending would provide alternativesources of finance for start-ups and a portionof the SR&ED credit would still be refundable,some start-ups might receive a lower level ofsupport through these measures. In view of this,the government may wish to investigate theadministrative feasibility and budgetaryconsequences of providing a fully refundablelabour-based tax credit for a fixed number ofyears for start-ups to ensure continued supportfor Canadian entrepreneurs who take on therisks of establishing new firms.6-14

Filling the GapsChapterFilling the Gaps7This chapter addresses the third and finalquestion in the charge to the Panel: “What, ifany, gaps are evident in the current suite ofprogramming, and what might be done to fillthese gaps?”The Panel is firm in its belief that the key toaddressing Canada’s well-documented businessinnovation challenges — including thesignificant commercialization gap — is tostrategically target efforts to support the growthof innovative firms into larger enterprises. It isonly by growing Canada’s innovative firms thatthe country’s business sector will achieve thescale required to become an innovation leaderon the world stage.Although many gaps can be identified in apolicy area as broad as the support of businessinnovation, an overriding consideration of thePanel is to ensure that programs respond toindustry’s “demand-pull” as a primary means ofhelping innovative firms grow and prosper — achallenge that was raised repeatedly in thePanel’s consultations. Three issues in particularstood out. How can the federal government’sown procurement needs be used to fosterinnovation? How can business imperatives beaddressed through large-scale, business–academic–government research collaborations?And how can risk capital be structured torespond to the needs of innovative firms at allstages of their development? Stakeholders toldthe Panel that addressing these issues wouldhelp meet the needs of firms seeking toinnovate and create value.Consistent with these views, an analysis by theOrganisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD forthcoming) of theinnovation systems of several countries identifiesweaknesses in Canada related to limited public–private research collaboration, difficulty intransforming knowledge into commercialapplications, and a low volume of venturecapital activity. Threats identified include adeclining trend in the funding of entrepreneurialventures. The same study also notes the dearthof “demand-side” measures — such as thosethat aim to strengthen the private sector’sutilization of innovation inputs — in Canada’smix of innovation instruments. Procurement isthe major demand-pull stimulus available togovernments to complement the large existingarray of supply-side programs.Broadly similar findings have been reported byother panels that have examined the innovationproblematique in Canada. The Council ofCanadian Academies highlighted the need to“improve the climate for new ventures so as tobetter translate opportunities arising fromCanada’s university research excellence intoviable Canadian-based growth businesses”(CCA 2009, p. 12). It also noted that Canadaranks low internationally for “governmentprocurement of advanced technologicalproducts” (CCA 2009, p. 78). The Expert Panel7-1

Filling the GapsChapterFilling the Gaps7This chapter addresses the third and finalquestion in the charge <strong>to</strong> the Panel: “What, ifany, gaps are evident in the current suite ofprogramming, and what might be done <strong>to</strong> fillthese gaps?”The Panel is firm in its belief that the key <strong>to</strong>addressing <strong>Canada</strong>’s well-documented businessinnovation challenges — including thesignificant commercialization gap — is <strong>to</strong>strategically target efforts <strong>to</strong> support the growthof innovative firms in<strong>to</strong> larger enterprises. It isonly by growing <strong>Canada</strong>’s innovative firms thatthe country’s business sec<strong>to</strong>r will achieve thescale required <strong>to</strong> become an innovation leaderon the world stage.Although many gaps can be identified in apolicy area as broad as the support of businessinnovation, an overriding consideration of thePanel is <strong>to</strong> ensure that programs respond <strong>to</strong>industry’s “demand-pull” as a primary means ofhelping innovative firms grow and prosper — achallenge that was raised repeatedly in thePanel’s consultations. Three issues in particulars<strong>to</strong>od out. How can the federal government’sown procurement needs be used <strong>to</strong> fosterinnovation? How can business imperatives beaddressed through large-scale, business–academic–government research collaborations?And how can risk capital be structured <strong>to</strong>respond <strong>to</strong> the needs of innovative firms at allstages of their development? Stakeholders <strong>to</strong>ldthe Panel that addressing these issues wouldhelp meet the needs of firms seeking <strong>to</strong>innovate and create value.Consistent with these views, an analysis by theOrganisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD forthcoming) of theinnovation systems of several countries identifiesweaknesses in <strong>Canada</strong> related <strong>to</strong> limited public–private research collaboration, difficulty intransforming knowledge in<strong>to</strong> commercialapplications, and a low volume of venturecapital activity. Threats identified include adeclining trend in the funding of entrepreneurialventures. The same study also notes the dearthof “demand-side” measures — such as thosethat aim <strong>to</strong> strengthen the private sec<strong>to</strong>r’sutilization of innovation inputs — in <strong>Canada</strong>’smix of innovation instruments. Procurement isthe major demand-pull stimulus available <strong>to</strong>governments <strong>to</strong> complement the large existingarray of supply-side programs.Broadly similar findings have been reported byother panels that have examined the innovationproblematique in <strong>Canada</strong>. The Council ofCanadian Academies highlighted the need <strong>to</strong>“improve the climate for new ventures so as <strong>to</strong>better translate opportunities arising from<strong>Canada</strong>’s university research excellence in<strong>to</strong>viable Canadian-based growth businesses”(CCA 2009, p. 12). It also noted that <strong>Canada</strong>ranks low internationally for “governmentprocurement of advanced technologicalproducts” (CCA 2009, p. 78). The Expert Panel7-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!