maestro seccion

Año 2012 Localidad RGD Modalidad 105 - MAESTRA DE SECCIONNº2 LEGAJO NOMBRE DNI TITULO PROMEDIO ANT.GEST. ANT. TIT. SERV.PR. O. SERV RESIDENC. PUBLIC. O. ANTEC. TOTAL136 6636 Caucota Sandra Noemi 28310490 9 7,39 0,5 1,2 3,9 0 0,2 0 1,05 23,24137 6508 Guajardo Pavez Carina 18819860 9 7,39 0,75 0,4 3,9 0 1,4 0 0,1 22,94138 7152 Tissberger Beatriz Valeria 26586820 9 8,73 0 2,2 0 0 0 0 3 22,93139 7210 Juarez Analia Del Valle 27868036 9 9,88 0 0,8 0 0 0 0 3 22,68140 6783 Cayuñam Elba Paola 29863573 9 8,48 0,5 0,2 1,3 0 3 0 0,15 22,63141 6699 Daniele Lucrecia Soledad 29964149 9 7,79 0,5 1,4 3,6 0 0,3 0 0 22,59142 6864 Rodriguez Carola Del Carmen 26305904 9 7,93 0,25 1,4 2,6 0 0,1 0 1,2 22,48143 6523 Campos Valeria Gisela 28219034 9 7,18 0,75 0,4 3,9 0 1,1 0 0,1 22,43144 6799 Aguila Gimena Soledad 33484319 9 6,94 0,5 0,2 2,6 0 3 0 0,15 22,39145 6848 Buznego Veronica Paula 28077083 9 7,93 0,25 1,4 1,3 0 0,1 0 2,4 22,38146 6782 Vega Maria Soledad 28783162 9 6,97 0,5 0,2 2,6 0 3 0 0,1 22,37147 7217 Onuszko Melisa Nadia 27590928 9 8,76 0 1,4 0 0 0 0 3 22,16148 6843 Rosales Fabiana Melisa 33484798 9 6,94 0,25 0,2 2,6 0 3 0 0,1 22,09149 6513 Cristaldo Maria De Los Angeles 26517971 9 6,66 0,5 1,6 2,6 0 0,3 0 1,2 21,86150 7126 Moreno Sabrina Erica 30968301 9 6,93 0 0,2 2,6 0 3 0,1 0 21,83151 7031 Arce Mariana Isabel 34559814 9 8,06 0,25 0 1,3 0 3 0 0,2 21,81152 6591 Huerga Maria Daniela 33048629 9 7,52 0,5 0,4 3,3 0 0,2 0 0,87 21,79153 6846 Chosco Natalia Vanesa 29629894 9 8,64 0,25 0,2 2,6 0 0,1 0 0,75 21,54154 7174 Quevedo Mariana Cecilia 29338455 9 7,91 0 1,6 0 0 0 0 3 21,51155 6742 Morales Analia De Los Angeles 24981005 9 7,44 0,5 0,8 2,5 0 0,2 0 0,95 21,39156 7044 Gonzalez Natalia Estefania 33992022 9 7,79 0,25 0 1,3 0 3 0 0 21,34157 7050 Cuquejo Maira Yemina 34375492 9 7,7 0,25 0 1,3 0 3 0 0 21,25158 7215 Aguirre Mariela Andrea Leticia 24787734 9 8,42 0 3 0 0 0,2 0 0,6 21,22159 7040 Ramirez Maria Itati 33484245 9 7,42 0,25 0 1,3 0 3 0 0,05 21,02160 6788 Villarroel Schvemer Silvana Beatriz 32510457 9 6,93 0,5 0,2 1,3 0 3 0 0,05 20,98161 7106 Tarnowski Maria Ema 27267652 9 7 0 1,2 1,3 0 0 0 2,35 20,85162 7038 Garcia Baldelomar Romina Yael 32131109 9 6,88 0,25 0 1,3 0 3 0 0,25 20,68163 7213 Huarte Maria Julia 33113792 9 8,48 0 0,2 0 0 0 0 3 20,68164 7109 Montaña Angelica Elizabeth 29073450 9 7,28 0 1,4 0 0 0 0 3 20,68165 7052 Tejada Jesica Anahi 31844401 9 7,27 0,25 0 0 0 3 0 0,2 19,72166 7115 Huaracan Paillan Jesica Roxana 31932077 9 7,23 0 0 0 0 3 0 0,35 19,58167 6839 Valderrama Esther Vanesa 31474687 9 6,79 0,25 0,2 2,6 0 0,1 0 0 18,94168 7181 Sacco Mariana Glenda 29698502 9 8,37 0 1,4 0 0 0 0 0 18,77169 6822 Beron Irene Beatriz 29673091 9 8,32 0,25 0,4 0 0 0,2 0 0,4 18,57170 7140 Rolon Roxana Marcela 24827412 9 8,55 0 0,8 0 0 0 0 0 18,35

6 Oleg N. KirillovFig. 3 Bifurcation of the domain of the asymptotic stability (white) in the plane (δ,Ω) at ν = 0with the change of the matrix D from the positive definite or weakly indefinite to strongly indefinite.Inequalities (8) describe the stability domain of m = 2-dimensional near-potentialsystem, shown in Fig. 2(a,b). In case of arbitrary m approximation to the domain iscaptured by the first- and second-order terms in the Taylor series for simple eigenvalues[5] of the matrix K perturbed by the gyroscopic, dissipative and circulatoryforces. The case when K has repeated eigenvalues will be considered in Section 4.3 A gyroscopic system with weak damping and circulatory forcesStability of a two-dimensional gyroscopic system (3) in the absence of dissipativeand circulatory forces (δ = ν = 0) is given by the following statement.Proposition 2. If detK > 0 and trK < 0, gyroscopic system (3) with two degreesof freedom is unstable by divergence for Ω 2 < Ω0− 2 , unstable by flutter for Ω−2 0 ≤Ω 2 ≤ Ω0+ 2 , and stable for Ω+ 20< Ω 2 , where the critical values Ω0 − and Ω+ 0 are0 ≤√−trK − 2 √ √detK =: Ω0 − ≤ Ω+ 0 := −trK+2 √ detK. (16)If detK > 0 and trK > 0, the gyroscopic system is stable for any Ω.If detK ≤ 0, the system is unstable.For K < 0 the statically unstable potential system can be stabilized by the gyroscopicforces. With the increase of Ω 2 the complex eigenvalues move along thecircle Reλ 2 + Imλ 2 = ω0 2 = √ detK until at Ω 2 = Ω0+ 2 they reach the imaginaryaxis and originate double eigenvalues ±iω 0 , Fig. 4. The onset of the gyroscopicstabilization Ω cr (δ,ν) of the near-Hamiltonian system deviates from Ω0 + [18].Theorem 2. Let the system (3) with even number m of degrees of freedom be gyroscopicallystabilized for Ω > Ω0 + and let at Ω = Ω+ 0its spectrum contain a doubleeigenvalue iω 0 with the Jordan chain u 0 , u 1 , satisfying the equations(−Iω 2 0 + iω 0Ω + 0 G+K)u 0 = 0,(−Iω 2 0 + iω 0Ω + 0 G+K)u 1 = −(2iω 0 I+Ω + 0 G)u 0. (17)