aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?
aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?
aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
improve recovery of lignin particles <strong>and</strong> the development of forage family <strong>and</strong> speciespecific<br />
equations for the estimation of the <strong>iNDF</strong>.<br />
The original AOAC lignin procedure for crucibles relied on the use of asbestos as a<br />
filtering agent, but the asbestos was rendered a health hazard <strong>and</strong> removed <strong>and</strong><br />
another filtering agent was never instituted, thus the variation in the lignin assay is<br />
partially a function of the filtering step. Data in Figure 1 shows examples of the<br />
lignin/NDF relationships for conventional <strong>and</strong> bmr corn, grasses <strong>and</strong> alfalfas. The two<br />
types of corn silages <strong>and</strong> the grasses present differing ratios, while the alfalfas are<br />
characterized by a less variable ratio (avg=2.8), with later (4 th <strong>and</strong> 5 th ) cuts having a<br />
different behavior <strong>and</strong> larger values. More data are needed to allow specific equations<br />
to be used for groups of forages. The improved recoveries alter the previous lignin to<br />
NDF relationships primarily because of the increased recoveries of both lignin <strong>and</strong><br />
fermented NDF <strong>and</strong> this does not invalidate the previous ratio of 2.4 but enhances our<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing to be more forage specific. More accurate <strong>and</strong> precise <strong>iNDF</strong> values will<br />
allow for better estimations of rates of NDF digestibility to be used in CNCPS.<br />
Table 2. Average increases in recoveries of <strong>ADL</strong> for different classes of forages using<br />
small pore size (1.5 µ) filter papers in Gooch crucibles.<br />
Class of forage % Increase in recovery<br />
Conv. corn silage 25<br />
Bmr corn silage 36<br />
Alfalfa 3<br />
Grasses 9<br />
Early cut grasses 28<br />
<strong>NDFd</strong>, <strong>kd</strong> <strong>and</strong> Chemical Structure of Lignin Bonds<br />
Finally, when comparing different plants, the negative correlations observed bet<strong>we</strong>en<br />
the extent of digestion <strong>and</strong> lignin content are relatively good for the same variety among<br />
stages of maturity; ho<strong>we</strong>ver, they are <strong>we</strong>aker within a family <strong>and</strong> poor when data from<br />
plant families are pooled (ie grasses <strong>and</strong> legumes). The action of lignins seems to<br />
depend not only on their amount but also on other factors like cross linking <strong>and</strong> because<br />
of the chemical nature of this heterogeneous compound, it is nearly impossible to<br />
extract lignin in any pure form – especially once it polymerizes into <strong>ADL</strong>.<br />
Lignin action on digestibility depends therefore not only on its content but its<br />
qualitative structural aspects. In general lignin is associated with carbohydrate (in<br />
particular with hemicellulose) through covalent bonds, hydroxycinnamic acids are<br />
attached to lignin <strong>and</strong> hemicellulose through ester <strong>and</strong> ether bonds as bridges bet<strong>we</strong>en<br />
them forming lignin/phenolic-carbohydrate complexes. It is generally accepted that the<br />
association of phenolic components with carbohydrates presents the greatest barrier to<br />
their utilization. It is <strong>we</strong>ll established that hydroxycinnamic acids attach to arabinoxylans<br />
through ester bonds. A simple dimerization of these esters, even if there is no further<br />
attachment to lignin, may be enough to substantially reduce the biodegradability of<br />
digestible cell walls. Any further association (ether bonds) bet<strong>we</strong>en this