02.12.2012 Views

aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?

aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?

aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

significance <strong>and</strong> with R 2 that varied bet<strong>we</strong>en 0.56 <strong>and</strong> 0.99. Results confirmed the lack<br />

of consistency among the forage types <strong>and</strong> the properties of the chemical structures<br />

<strong>and</strong> digestibility <strong>and</strong> rates of digestion. This clearly demonstrates that that factors<br />

affecting rates <strong>and</strong> extents of digestion of NDF vary by forage type <strong>and</strong> most likely<br />

maturity.<br />

Table 2: Independent variables selected <strong>and</strong> their solution for each forage group <strong>and</strong><br />

dependent variable.<br />

Dependent<br />

Variable<br />

<strong>kd</strong> <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.72 EthFA: 0.87 <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.74 KL: -0.45<br />

R 2<br />

EthFA: -0.68 EstFA: -1.07 EstPCA: 1.04<br />

0.97 0.75 0.79 0.84<br />

24h iv<strong>NDFd</strong> <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.84 <strong>ADL</strong>: -1.12 EthPCA: -0.75 KL: -0.62<br />

R 2<br />

EthFA: -0.52 EstPCA: 0.36 EstPCA: 1.09<br />

0.98 0.97 0.56 0.92<br />

96h iv<strong>NDFd</strong> <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.90 KL: 0.16 (KL-<strong>ADL</strong>): -0.57<br />

R 2<br />

Forage group<br />

Grasses Imm. grasses Conv. corn Bmr corn<br />

EthFA: -0.40 <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.59 EthFA: 0.70<br />

EthFA: 0.48 EstPCA: 0.34<br />

0.97<br />

Significance level = 0.10<br />

0.99 0.84<br />

Figure 2: Relationship bet<strong>we</strong>en 24hr NDFD <strong>and</strong> ester linked pCA in NDF residues

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!