aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?
aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?
aNDF, NDFd, iNDF, ADL and kd: What have we learned?
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
significance <strong>and</strong> with R 2 that varied bet<strong>we</strong>en 0.56 <strong>and</strong> 0.99. Results confirmed the lack<br />
of consistency among the forage types <strong>and</strong> the properties of the chemical structures<br />
<strong>and</strong> digestibility <strong>and</strong> rates of digestion. This clearly demonstrates that that factors<br />
affecting rates <strong>and</strong> extents of digestion of NDF vary by forage type <strong>and</strong> most likely<br />
maturity.<br />
Table 2: Independent variables selected <strong>and</strong> their solution for each forage group <strong>and</strong><br />
dependent variable.<br />
Dependent<br />
Variable<br />
<strong>kd</strong> <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.72 EthFA: 0.87 <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.74 KL: -0.45<br />
R 2<br />
EthFA: -0.68 EstFA: -1.07 EstPCA: 1.04<br />
0.97 0.75 0.79 0.84<br />
24h iv<strong>NDFd</strong> <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.84 <strong>ADL</strong>: -1.12 EthPCA: -0.75 KL: -0.62<br />
R 2<br />
EthFA: -0.52 EstPCA: 0.36 EstPCA: 1.09<br />
0.98 0.97 0.56 0.92<br />
96h iv<strong>NDFd</strong> <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.90 KL: 0.16 (KL-<strong>ADL</strong>): -0.57<br />
R 2<br />
Forage group<br />
Grasses Imm. grasses Conv. corn Bmr corn<br />
EthFA: -0.40 <strong>ADL</strong>: -0.59 EthFA: 0.70<br />
EthFA: 0.48 EstPCA: 0.34<br />
0.97<br />
Significance level = 0.10<br />
0.99 0.84<br />
Figure 2: Relationship bet<strong>we</strong>en 24hr NDFD <strong>and</strong> ester linked pCA in NDF residues