an experimental investigation of the interactions ... - Vlerick Public

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE 5:Hypothesis 2: Number of Supplier Selections with a Purchase Intention Higher than 50Table 5 reports the results for Hypothesis 2 for the number of supplier selections with a purchase intentionhigher than 50. Panel A contains the Anova-results. The simple effects of interest are reported in Panel B. ‘Low’refers to the conditions in which the descriptive social norms do not promote intra-firm cooperation and ‘High’refers to the conditions in which the descriptive social norms promote intra-firm cooperation.Panel A: Anova resultsSource Df SS MS F p-valueModel 5 511.24 102.25 33.12
FIGURE 1:Expected EffectsFigure 1 shows the expected effects based on Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2. Misaligned 1 refers to the combination of adepartment-based incentive system and a firm-based information system. Misaligned 2 refers to the combination of a firmbasedincentive system and a department-based information system. Aligned refers to the combination of a firm-basedincentive system and a firm-based information system. ‘Low’ refers to the conditions in which the descriptive social normsdo not promote intra-firm cooperation and ‘High’ refers to the conditions in which the descriptive social norms promoteintra-firm cooperation.degree of firm-optimizingsupplier selectionshighlowmisaligned 1 misaligned 2 aligned33
Page 1 and 2: Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper S
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACTEmployees often make decisi
Page 5 and 6: practice. Some firms, for instance,
Page 7 and 8: the firm’s interest. Our evidence
Page 9 and 10: often have a well-specified corpora
Page 11 and 12: Our theoretical reasoning assumes t
Page 13 and 14: supplier of wood, which is the most
Page 15 and 16: Revenues that a supplier will gener
Page 17 and 18: The descriptive statistics about th
Page 19 and 20: Overall, our results are consistent
Page 21 and 22: especially important in ambiguous s
Page 23 and 24: REFERENCESAnand, G., P.T. Ward, and
Page 25 and 26: Ivens, B.J., C. Pardo, and A. Tunis
Page 27 and 28: Wouters, M., J.C. Anderson, and F.
Page 29 and 30: TABLE 2: Quintile Distribution of t
Page 31: TABLE 4:Hypothesis 2: Degree of Fir
Page 35 and 36: FIGURE 3:Hypothesis 2: Degree of Fi
Page 37: APPENDIX 1Panel A: Information syst

an experimental investigation of the interactions ... - Vlerick Public

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?