an experimental investigation of the interactions ... - Vlerick Public

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cousins, P.D., R.B. Handfield, B. Lawson, and K.J. Petersen. 2006. Creating supply chain relationalcapital: the impact of formal and informal socialization processes. Journal of OperationsManagement 24: 851-863.Degraeve, Z., and F. Roodhooft. 2001. A smarter way to buy. Harvard Business Review 79(6): 22-23.Deutsch, M., and H.B. Gerard. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences uponindividual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51: 629-636.Doerr, K.H., T.R. Mitchell, T.D. Klastorin, and K.A. Brown. 1996. Impact of material flow policies andgoals on job outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 81(2): 142-152.Dumond, E.J. 1994. Making best use of performance measures and performance. InternationalJournal of Operations and Production Management 14(9): 16-31.Fisher, P., and S. Huddart. 2008. Optimal contracting with endogenous social norms. AmericanEconomic Review 98: 1459-1475.Gaertner, L., C. Sedikides, J.L. Vevea, and J. Iuzini. 2002. The “I”, the “we” and the “when”: a metaanalysisof motivational primacy in self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83:574-591.Galbraith, J.R. 2005. Designing the customer-centric organisation, a guide to strategy, structure andprocess. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.Goldstein, N.J., R.B. Cialdini, and V. Griskevicius. 2008. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms tomotivate environmental conservations in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35: 472-482.Goldstein, N.J., and R.B. Cialdini. 2010. Managing Normative Influences in Organizations. In D. DeCremer, R. van Dick, and J.K. Murnighan (Eds), Social Psychology and Organizations, Routledge.Heikkilä, J. 2002. From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction.Journal of Operations Management 20: 747-767.24
Ivens, B.J., C. Pardo, and A. Tunisini. 2009. Organizing and integrating marketing and purchasing inbusiness markets: An introduction to the special issue, issues and implications. Industrial MarketingManagement 38: 851-856.Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs andownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.Jensen, M. 2001. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function.Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14(3): 8-21.Jorgensen, B., and M. Messner. 2009. Management Control in New Product Development: TheDynamics of Managing Flexibility and Efficiency. Journal of Management Accounting Research 21: 99-124.Kallgren, C.A., R.R. Reno, and R.B. Cialdini. 2000. A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: When NormsDo and Do not Affect Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 1002-1012.Kramer, R. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions.Annual Review of Psychology 50: 569-598.Maltz, E., and A.K. Kohli. 1996. Market Intelligence Dissemination Across Functional Boundaries.Journal of Marketing Research 33: 47-61.Merchant, K., and W.A. Van der Stede. 2007. Management Control Systems: PerformanceMeasurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Prentice Hall.Messick, D.M. 1999. Alternative logics for decision-making in social settings. Journal of EconomicBehavior & Organization 39(1): 11-28.Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1992. Economics, Organization & Management. Prentice Hall.Pizzini, M. 2010. Group-Based Compensation in Professional Service Firms: An Empirical Analysis ofMedical Group Practices. The Accounting Review 85(1): 343-380.25
Page 1 and 2: Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper S
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACTEmployees often make decisi
Page 5 and 6: practice. Some firms, for instance,
Page 7 and 8: the firm’s interest. Our evidence
Page 9 and 10: often have a well-specified corpora
Page 11 and 12: Our theoretical reasoning assumes t
Page 13 and 14: supplier of wood, which is the most
Page 15 and 16: Revenues that a supplier will gener
Page 17 and 18: The descriptive statistics about th
Page 19 and 20: Overall, our results are consistent
Page 21 and 22: especially important in ambiguous s
Page 23: REFERENCESAnand, G., P.T. Ward, and
Page 27 and 28: Wouters, M., J.C. Anderson, and F.
Page 29 and 30: TABLE 2: Quintile Distribution of t
Page 31 and 32: TABLE 4:Hypothesis 2: Degree of Fir
Page 33 and 34: FIGURE 1:Expected EffectsFigure 1 s
Page 35 and 36: FIGURE 3:Hypothesis 2: Degree of Fi
Page 37: APPENDIX 1Panel A: Information syst

an experimental investigation of the interactions ... - Vlerick Public

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?