12.07.2015 Views

Download English - Zimmer Dental

Download English - Zimmer Dental

Download English - Zimmer Dental

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The evolution and evaluation of twointerference-fit implant interfaces.Abstract and ConclusionsBy Paul P. BinonPostgraduate Dentistry1996:3(1)Component misfit has been implicatedas one of several important factors inscrew-joint failure and screw loosening indental implants. Recent evidence indicatesthat rotational misfit may be moreimportant in screw-joint stability thanoriginally anticipated. Efforts have beenmade to reduce and/or eliminaterotational misfit with different nonrotatingimplant interfaces. The effectiveness ofan interference-fit implant interface isreported in this article. The implantswere evaluated for rotational movement,the intimacy and nature of hexagonalcontact, the adequacy of the implant/abutment interface seal, and machiningconsistency of the hexagonals andimplant. Currently available componentsare contrasted with components thatwere available initially in the evolution ofthe friction-fit/interference-fit interfaces.Significant improvements and refinementshave been incorporated into the currentgeneration of components.ConclusionsThe friction-fit hexagonal implant wasevaluated and contrasted for machiningconsistency, interface fit, and rotationalstability. From the data presented, thefollowing conclusions can be drawn:1. Rotational freedom (misfit) forthe [Screw-Vent] implant/abutmentsystems...was 0 degrees...when fullytightened to 30 Ncm.2. The SEM and microphotograph crosssectionsdocument intimate hexagonalcontact and interference fit that results inabutment rotational stability.3. Refinements in machining tolerancesand the availability of a reliable methodof torque application have resulted inpredictable and consistent implant/abutment interface seals.References1. Binon PP: The evolution and evaluation of twointerference-fit implant interfaces. Postgraduate Dent1996;3:3-13.2. Binon PP: Evaluation of machining accuracy andconsistency of selected implants, standard abutmentsand laboratory analogs. Int J Prosthodont1995;8:162-178.3. Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K: Clinicalcomplications of osseointegrated implants. JProsthetic Dent 1999;8:537-552.Optical cross-sectionmicrographs of the Screw-Vent implant/abutmentcombination were evaluated.This image illustrates thetypical intimate contact andfriction-fit between theinternal straight hexagon ofthe implant and the external1-degree tapered hexagonof the abutment.The beveled seating areaalso demonstrates fullcontact and an intimate seal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!