Download English - Zimmer Dental
Download English - Zimmer Dental
Download English - Zimmer Dental
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The evolution and evaluation of twointerference-fit implant interfaces.Abstract and ConclusionsBy Paul P. BinonPostgraduate Dentistry1996:3(1)Component misfit has been implicatedas one of several important factors inscrew-joint failure and screw loosening indental implants. Recent evidence indicatesthat rotational misfit may be moreimportant in screw-joint stability thanoriginally anticipated. Efforts have beenmade to reduce and/or eliminaterotational misfit with different nonrotatingimplant interfaces. The effectiveness ofan interference-fit implant interface isreported in this article. The implantswere evaluated for rotational movement,the intimacy and nature of hexagonalcontact, the adequacy of the implant/abutment interface seal, and machiningconsistency of the hexagonals andimplant. Currently available componentsare contrasted with components thatwere available initially in the evolution ofthe friction-fit/interference-fit interfaces.Significant improvements and refinementshave been incorporated into the currentgeneration of components.ConclusionsThe friction-fit hexagonal implant wasevaluated and contrasted for machiningconsistency, interface fit, and rotationalstability. From the data presented, thefollowing conclusions can be drawn:1. Rotational freedom (misfit) forthe [Screw-Vent] implant/abutmentsystems...was 0 degrees...when fullytightened to 30 Ncm.2. The SEM and microphotograph crosssectionsdocument intimate hexagonalcontact and interference fit that results inabutment rotational stability.3. Refinements in machining tolerancesand the availability of a reliable methodof torque application have resulted inpredictable and consistent implant/abutment interface seals.References1. Binon PP: The evolution and evaluation of twointerference-fit implant interfaces. Postgraduate Dent1996;3:3-13.2. Binon PP: Evaluation of machining accuracy andconsistency of selected implants, standard abutmentsand laboratory analogs. Int J Prosthodont1995;8:162-178.3. Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K: Clinicalcomplications of osseointegrated implants. JProsthetic Dent 1999;8:537-552.Optical cross-sectionmicrographs of the Screw-Vent implant/abutmentcombination were evaluated.This image illustrates thetypical intimate contact andfriction-fit between theinternal straight hexagon ofthe implant and the external1-degree tapered hexagonof the abutment.The beveled seating areaalso demonstrates fullcontact and an intimate seal.