12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

such as agriculture, housing, industry, mining, etc. In October 1992, guidelines were issuedunder the FCA, detailing the terms and conditions subject to which diversion could beallowed. One <strong>of</strong> the essential conditions was that the user agency would adequatelycompensate for forest loss by raising compensatory afforestation in non-forest land <strong>of</strong>equivalent area.3.21 As per the FCA guidelines, all mining, including underground mining, requires priorapproval <strong>of</strong> the Central government (MOEF). The FCA applies not only to the surface areathat is used in mining but also to the underground mining area beneath the forest. Renewal <strong>of</strong>an existing ML in a forest area also requires prior approval <strong>of</strong> the Central government. Theguidelines provide that prospecting <strong>of</strong> any mineral done under a PL granted under theMMDR Act, 1957 that requires collection/removal <strong>of</strong> samples from the forest land would betreated as a stage between survey and investigation (reconnaissance) and grant <strong>of</strong> ML and,therefore, permission under FCA would be required. However, test drilling upto 10 boreholes <strong>of</strong> maximum 4 inches diameter per 100 sq. km for prospecting, without felling <strong>of</strong> trees,did not attract the provisions <strong>of</strong> the FCA. In all other cases involving drilling <strong>of</strong> bore holes,prior permission <strong>of</strong> the Central government under the FCA would be required. It has beenclarified that the permission to survey, explore, or prospect would not ipso facto imply anycommitment on the part <strong>of</strong> the Central government for grant <strong>of</strong> a ML in forest land. However,such a stipulation militates against the seamless transfer dispensation that the Committeewould like to promote to attract investment into mining. The Committee would, therefore,propose that the conditionality for environmental clearance for eventual grant <strong>of</strong> ML may bespelt out in advance and a prospector who meets the conditionality may be assured <strong>of</strong> FCAclearance eventually. The essential difference between a mining intervention and otherinterventions is that the miner eventually leaves the land and can recreate or even improveupon the forest as it existed before commencement <strong>of</strong> operations. The guidelines also providethat:(i)Investigations and surveys carried out in connection with development projects such astransmission lines, hydro-electric projects, seismic surveys, exploration for oil drilling, min ing,etc. will not attract the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act as long as these surveys do not involve any clearing<strong>of</strong> forest or cutting <strong>of</strong> trees, and operations are restricted to clearing <strong>of</strong> bushes and lopping <strong>of</strong> treebranches for purpose <strong>of</strong> sighting.(ii)If, however, investigations and surveys involve clearing <strong>of</strong> forest area or felling <strong>of</strong> trees, priorpermission <strong>of</strong> the Central Government is mandatory.79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!