12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e obviated if the lease deed is exhaustive and includes all minerals andassociated minerals.(vi) Rule 27(3) <strong>of</strong> MCR is discretionary in that it allows the states/Centre to putrestrictive conditions in MLs, which have not been spelt out in advance. Aprospector needs to know the terms and conditions on which a ML will begranted to him before he starts investing in prospecting operations. Section27(2) should be enough to take care <strong>of</strong> environmental and other concerns listedthere. The ability <strong>of</strong> the government to impose additional obligations in thelease without specifying them in advance means that applicants would notknow the obligations imposed upon them until they obtain the lease.(vii) Rule 34 <strong>of</strong> MCR, which empowers the state government to exclude or reduceany area from the licensed area, also contributes to uncertainty arising out <strong>of</strong> thearbitrary powers <strong>of</strong> the state government. Concessionaires who may haveinvested large sums in a risky venture on the understanding that they would beallowed to mine an ore body discovered and identified during exploration areexposed to the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> the area being reduced or a portion excluded.1.60 The Committee was unanimous on the point that providing security <strong>of</strong> tenure to theinvestor was a precondition for stimulating investment in mining activity. Investors shouldhave the guarantee that if in the course <strong>of</strong> exploration a deposit is discovered, the exclusiveright to mine it would vest with them and that they would not be deprived <strong>of</strong> it under somepretext or the other. Although the MMDR Act provides for a preferential right to the PLholder this provision is not sufficient to assure investors <strong>of</strong> security <strong>of</strong> tenure because it isqualified by a number <strong>of</strong> discretionary powers <strong>of</strong> the state, which make the preferenceillusory. In view <strong>of</strong> the above, the Committee recommends that:(i)(ii)RP (non-exclusive) holders should have an automatic right to a PL on firstcome-first-servedbasis, provided they fulfil the requirement for submission <strong>of</strong>data and satisfy all eligibility conditions. The provision <strong>of</strong> preferential right toexisting RP holders should, however, continue until the duration <strong>of</strong> the RP runsout.Where a LAPL/PL has been granted in respect <strong>of</strong> a land the licensee shall havethe exclusive right to obtain a ML in respect <strong>of</strong> that land over any other person40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!