12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

per plan should be significantly higher than the prescribed penalties (as <strong>of</strong> 30June <strong>2006</strong>).Mining Leases1.45 MLs cannot not be given unless there is ample evidence <strong>of</strong> an adequately prospectedore body, i.e. data describing in detail the entire ore body which is the end product <strong>of</strong> asuccessful PL operation. However, the current dispensation does not lay down thisrequirement clearly, except Section 5(2)(a) <strong>of</strong> the MMDR Act, which requires only pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>mineral occurrence resulting from a RP (simple reconnaissance or regional explorationexercise). Of course, the requirement <strong>of</strong> a mining plan takes care <strong>of</strong> this issue to a certainextent but the Act needs to clearly lay down this requirement and the MCR should lay downin detail the nature <strong>of</strong> data to be provided in respect <strong>of</strong> each parameter. It may be mentionedthat this is one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons why a large number <strong>of</strong> leases have remained nonoperational.MLs that have been given on the basis <strong>of</strong> RP data instead <strong>of</strong> PL data cannot beoperated as prospecting (detailed exploration) is still to be completed. ML holders who aremostly in the small and medium enterprise (SME) sector have neither the knowledge nor thefunds required for detailed exploration and hence the MLs remain idle.1.46 MLs are granted in two kinds <strong>of</strong> areas, viz. areas prospected by a PL holder and areasprospected by State agencies with well-delineated, i.e. fully prospected, ore bodies ready formine development and mineral extraction. The issues concerning the former are dealt with inparagraphs 1.58 and 1.59 below, which deal with security <strong>of</strong> tenure. The issue <strong>of</strong> grantingMLs in respect <strong>of</strong> ore bodies fully prospected by public agencies at public expense has alsobeen discussed earlier in paragraph 1.32 above. It has been proposed in the interest <strong>of</strong>transparency and for augmenting state revenues that the free distribution <strong>of</strong> such mineralresources may be done away with and that the ore bodies be disposed <strong>of</strong> through atender/auction process as a matter <strong>of</strong> policy. For the tender/auction process to be introduced,it will be necessary to amend the MMDR Act to grant the power to make disposals and alsoamend the rules to provide a transparent procedure for such disposals. At present, the disposal<strong>of</strong> such ore bodies is done along with other areas on a simple first-come-first-served basis[Section 11(2)] or where an area is notified in terms <strong>of</strong> Section 11(4) by inviting applicationsand selecting one among several applications on the broad parameters mentioned in Section32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!