National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines
National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines
(1) Provide proximate and strategic security of these critical raw material for1. Existing and under commissioning steel capacities and for2. Rapid and orderly growth of a globally competitive Indian steelindustry.(2) Promote globally comparable best practices in (iron ore, chrome ore andmanganese ore) mines for optimizing extraction of metallic values from) minedmaterial, minimizing waste and rehabilitating post-mining environment, with a viewto long term strategic conservation of metallic content for future needs for sustainabledevelopment.(3) Encourage efficient, scientific, sustainable and globally competitive miningpractices, with utmost care for preservation and enhancement of the environment andnatural bio-diversity.9. The Preferences are based on multiple levels of interaction by the Expert Group withrepresentatives from a large cross-section of steel makers, mine operators and technologistsin the mineral and metallic industries, and endeavour to incorporate relevant availabletechnical knowledge and information at this point of time.10. The very concept of enunciating a Preferential Schedule cannot be disassociated fromthe requirement of ensuring implementation of the conditionalities which alone justify andare the very essence of according preference to one party over another. The conditionalitiesare therefore incorporated as part and parcel of the preferences.11. Special care has to be taken to ensure that such a scheme of preferences does notbecome an opportunity for anyone to lock up mineral reserves and obstruct the existingwidely dispersed and well managed private sector iron ore mines.12. The effective implementation and fulfillment of the conditionalities will requireelaborate exercises in order to construct relevant legal protocols, structure appropriatereporting and monitoring mechanisms etc. This is not within the scope of the present limitedexercise.240
13. The proposed set of reference is based on the following broad considerations ofnational interest:-(i)The existing public sector integrated steel plants represent massive investmentsof public money already made. It is of highest priority to safeguard sufficient rawmaterial reserves not only for the existing capacities of these plants, but also their incampus expansion and capacity optimization to the maximum extent feasible andapproved by the Central Government.(ii)Other major integrated steel plants of Indian public limited companies alsorepresent large national investments of money, not just by promoters but also byIndian public at large, whether directly or through financial institutions. Hence, theseinvestments also need to be assured reasonable long term raw material security. Tothe extent that such plants are already operating or are under commissioning byMarch 2006, their long term requirements of iron ore must be provided for on priority.(iii)In furtherance of the objective of expanding Indian steel production, iron ore has to beearmarked for new greenfield integrated plants and also for brownfield expansionof existing plants by the private/public sector. However, there are large number ofproposals from private sector for setting up new plants and expanding existingcapacities. Not all of them can be depended upon to materialize in a time bound andefficient manner. It is, therefore, essential to build stringent safeguards into the termsand conditionalities under which such private promoters are afforded the privilege ofpreferential grant of lease. It is also to be ensured through watertight and legallytenable protocols, that no applicant is able to lock up precious iron reserves byadopting delaying tactics, political maneuvering or legal tangles. Stringentadditional penalties should also be stipulated, apart from automatic lapsing of suchleases without legal recourse.(iv)In view of the paramount need to take a quantum leap in steel capacity and percapita steel consumption and keeping in mind domestic financial and technologyground realities, there should be no barrier for one or two large foreign entitieswith proven track record and access to global finance and cutting edge241
- Page 200 and 201: • The fees should be significantl
- Page 202 and 203: surveys have been undertaken, the P
- Page 204 and 205: automatic until the exhaustion of t
- Page 206 and 207: y stating in the MMDR Act that a pr
- Page 208 and 209: departmental representative for sec
- Page 210 and 211: therefore (under Rule 63A), pass su
- Page 212 and 213: • Section 12(1) of the MMDR Act s
- Page 214 and 215: o The lessee should not be asked to
- Page 216 and 217: again and the State Mines Departmen
- Page 218 and 219: • As in the past, no environmenta
- Page 220 and 221: oad and rail, and lack of long-term
- Page 222 and 223: government to the applicants who ar
- Page 224 and 225: next three-year period as well. In
- Page 226 and 227: • Rates of dead rent should be ra
- Page 228 and 229: measure to provide a level playing
- Page 230 and 231: • In respect of three titanium be
- Page 232 and 233: No-I&M-25(3)/2005Government of Indi
- Page 234 and 235: No-I&M-25(3)/2005Planning Commissio
- Page 236 and 237: ‘Efforts would also be made to gr
- Page 238 and 239: ecommending amendments to the Act a
- Page 240 and 241: etained as a Prescribed Substance u
- Page 242 and 243: OthersShri Arvind VarmaEx-Secretary
- Page 244 and 245: 16. Reserve Bank of India17. M/s Ji
- Page 246 and 247: the RP holders in areas beyond 25 s
- Page 248 and 249: Appendix ERecommendations of the Ex
- Page 252 and 253: technology to enter the Indian stee
- Page 254 and 255: Cross-country Comparison of Mining
- Page 256 and 257: Appendix F (cont.)Country Mining La
- Page 258 and 259: Cross-country Comparison of Mining
- Page 260 and 261: Appendix G (cont.)Country Mining le
- Page 262 and 263: CountryAppendix H (Cont.)Environmen
- Page 264 and 265: AustraliaIndonesia 9 4 Not specifie
- Page 266 and 267: Annexure 1 (cont.)Geologicalenviron
- Page 268 and 269: operations are undertaken over a fa
- Page 270 and 271: B. After Rule 54 of the Mineral Con
- Page 272 and 273: the Central Government to entertain
- Page 274 and 275: applications, could exercise the ju
- Page 276 and 277: We most humbly request that the abo
- Page 278 and 279: Annexure 4The 2002Sustainability Re
- Page 280 and 281: While unique in its coverage and pr
- Page 282 and 283: • facilitate comparability• add
- Page 284 and 285: AssuranceJust as investors look to
- Page 286 and 287: The Guidelines are structured in fi
- Page 288 and 289: There are many aspects relevant for
- Page 290 and 291: - Issues in which community partici
- Page 292 and 293: Annexure 7Royalty Accruals on Miner
- Page 294 and 295: Sl.No.MineralAnnexure 8 (cont.)2003
- Page 296 and 297: Annexure 91 THE SECOND SCHEDULE 1(S
- Page 298 and 299: (v) Group V Coals:(a) Non-Coking Co
(1) Provide proximate and strategic security <strong>of</strong> these critical raw material for1. Existing and under commissioning steel capacities and for2. Rapid and orderly growth <strong>of</strong> a globally competitive Indian steelindustry.(2) Promote globally comparable best practices in (iron ore, chrome ore andmanganese ore) mines for optimizing extraction <strong>of</strong> metallic values from) minedmaterial, minimizing waste and rehabilitating post-mining environment, with a viewto long term strategic conservation <strong>of</strong> metallic content for future needs for sustainabledevelopment.(3) Encourage efficient, scientific, sustainable and globally competitive miningpractices, with utmost care for preservation and enhancement <strong>of</strong> the environment andnatural bio-diversity.9. The Preferences are based on multiple levels <strong>of</strong> interaction by the Expert Group withrepresentatives from a large cross-section <strong>of</strong> steel makers, mine operators and technologistsin the mineral and metallic industries, and endeavour to incorporate relevant availabletechnical knowledge and information at this point <strong>of</strong> time.10. The very concept <strong>of</strong> enunciating a Preferential Schedule cannot be disassociated fromthe requirement <strong>of</strong> ensuring implementation <strong>of</strong> the conditionalities which alone justify andare the very essence <strong>of</strong> according preference to one party over another. The conditionalitiesare therefore incorporated as part and parcel <strong>of</strong> the preferences.11. Special care has to be taken to ensure that such a scheme <strong>of</strong> preferences does notbecome an opportunity for anyone to lock up mineral reserves and obstruct the existingwidely dispersed and well managed private sector iron ore mines.12. The effective implementation and fulfillment <strong>of</strong> the conditionalities will requireelaborate exercises in order to construct relevant legal protocols, structure appropriatereporting and monitoring mechanisms etc. This is not within the scope <strong>of</strong> the present limitedexercise.240