12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

measure to provide a level playing field. These existing steel companies would haveto enter into tie-ups with experienced mining companies so that they become eligiblein terms <strong>of</strong> Section 11(3)(a) <strong>of</strong> the MMDR Act. Due regard should be given to thesize <strong>of</strong> the steel making capacity when considering allocation <strong>of</strong> a specific ore body.[7.47]• Scientific and vigorous prospecting in the country should be encouraged. LAPLs andPLs for magnetite may be freely given to both stand alone and captive miners,whether Indian or foreign. LAPLs for haematite may be given only after strictlyensuring that GSI or another state agency has not already done the requisiteexploration. [7.47]• Captive iron ore mines allotted to steel makers should use the ore from these minesfor their own steel and should not sell the same either in India or abroad. [7.47]RESTRICTIONS ON THE EXPORT OF IRON ORE• The Committee finds it anomalous that exports are regulated through a dualmechanism <strong>of</strong> canalisation as well as export licensing. [7.61]• The export regime for iron ore <strong>of</strong> higher grade does not make any distinction betweenfines and lumps although, as noted earlier, fines are particularly in surplus in thecountry. The rationale for the 64 per cent cut-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Fe content is also not clear, as thecut-<strong>of</strong>f in IBM classification is 65 per cent. [7.62]• In light <strong>of</strong> the assessment regarding availability <strong>of</strong> iron ore resources in relation tocurrent domestic production, and the appraisal <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> export controls on thehealth <strong>of</strong> the mining industry and its attractiveness for investment, the Committee hasconcluded that there is no need to impose any quantitative restrictions on exports butthat the position should be revisited after 10 years. However, by way <strong>of</strong> abundantprecaution, the Committee recommends that an export duty may be levied on exports<strong>of</strong> iron ore in lump form with Fe content above 65 per cent. The system <strong>of</strong> licensingand canalisation currently in operation should be discontinued. Also captive minersshould not be allowed to export either fines or lumps. They should sinter the formerand use the latter in their own blast furnaces. [7.63]218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!