National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

planningcommission.gov.in
from planningcommission.gov.in More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

• Rates of dead rent should be rationalised so that they act as an effective deterrentagainst a mine owner who does not undertake mining as per the approved mining planand prefers to keep large areas idle and keeps the mineral resources undeveloped. Inother words, an escalating scale of dead rent should be worked out. This should bestringently applied to captive miners and PSUs as well. [6.26]• The state governments would get revenues from the disposal of the ore bodies thathave been explored earlier at public expense by an open tender/auction system asexplained in Chapter 1. [6.26]• Transfer fees should be levied on PLs and MLs sought to be transferred. Asmentioned in Chapter 1, the unbundling of prospecting from mining is likely to bringin investment in the form of FDI into prospecting along with advanced technology.When the PL or ML of a prospected area is transferred for a premium by aprospecting firm in favour of a mining firm or if the firm itself is taken over oracquired by a mining firm for a consideration, a transfer fee as a percentage of thepremium or consideration may be levied. Such a step would be in line withinternational practice. The rates of transfer fee should be suggested by the next studygroup set up for making recommendations on royalty rates. [6.26]OTHER ISSUESRAISING FUNDS FOR PROSPECTING• The Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) in consultation with SEBIand the major stock exchanges should examine the possibility of providing a specialdispensation for mining sector companies on the lines of ASX and AIM and TSX’sTVE so that investment in prospecting companies is encouraged. ASX-type assistanceby way of improving investor communications, equity research, and appropriate indexsupport to the mining sector would help attract private equity funds to this sector. Thesectoral focus of private equity, including venture capital, and the financial marketsgenerally is at present on identified emerging growth sectors, viz. IT, ITeS, media,telecom, lately commercial real estate, etc. With excellent growth potential appearingon the horizon on account of the new mining dispensation it is imperative that the216

fund-raising environment for prospectors and miners moves in step to bring about thegrowth of mining. [7.14]ALLOCATION OF CAPTIVE MINES TO STEEL MAKERS• On the basis of current assumptions of demand and supply of iron ore in the countryand of the growth in both, India would have enough resources to last until the end ofthe twenty-first century and there is no basis for basing policy changes on theexhaustion of these resources in the near future. However, the position would need tobe kept under review and adjustments made in it in light of the emerging situationfrom time to time. The first review should take place after a period of 10 years, i.e. in2016–17. [7.34]• Stand alone mining and captive mining should continue to co-exist in the country. Theposition should be reviewed in 2016–17 in light of the emerging situation ofestablishment of steel capacity in the country, on the one hand, and accretions to thelevel of iron ore resources in the country, on the other. A view can be taken at thattime on whether the balance of advantage in the grant of LAPL/PL/ML should bechanged in favour of steel mills. [7.47]• Through appropriate changes in Section 11(3)(d) it should be clarified that in asituation of multiple applications for grant of iron ore LAPL/PL/ML, the existinginvestment in steel plants that have exhausted their current captive mines should be aconsideration. However, the applicant must independently qualify under other criteria,including Section 11(3)(a) relating to prior experience. This is necessary to ensureefficient mining. [7.47]• Existing captive mines should be renewed if they have complied with the conditionsof the lease and the life of the steel plant so warrants taking into account existing andplanned capacities. In the case of new capacities, the recommendations of Chapter 5will apply. [7.47]• Steel making capacities already in existence on 1 July 2006 that do not have captivemines may also be given preferential allocation of adequate iron ore reserves withinthe state without the need to go through the process of tender/auction, as a one-time217

fund-raising environment for prospectors and miners moves in step to bring about thegrowth <strong>of</strong> mining. [7.14]ALLOCATION OF CAPTIVE MINES TO STEEL MAKERS• On the basis <strong>of</strong> current assumptions <strong>of</strong> demand and supply <strong>of</strong> iron ore in the countryand <strong>of</strong> the growth in both, India would have enough resources to last until the end <strong>of</strong>the twenty-first century and there is no basis for basing policy changes on theexhaustion <strong>of</strong> these resources in the near future. However, the position would need tobe kept under review and adjustments made in it in light <strong>of</strong> the emerging situationfrom time to time. The first review should take place after a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years, i.e. in2016–17. [7.34]• Stand alone mining and captive mining should continue to co-exist in the country. Theposition should be reviewed in 2016–17 in light <strong>of</strong> the emerging situation <strong>of</strong>establishment <strong>of</strong> steel capacity in the country, on the one hand, and accretions to thelevel <strong>of</strong> iron ore resources in the country, on the other. A view can be taken at thattime on whether the balance <strong>of</strong> advantage in the grant <strong>of</strong> LAPL/PL/ML should bechanged in favour <strong>of</strong> steel mills. [7.47]• Through appropriate changes in Section 11(3)(d) it should be clarified that in asituation <strong>of</strong> multiple applications for grant <strong>of</strong> iron ore LAPL/PL/ML, the existinginvestment in steel plants that have exhausted their current captive mines should be aconsideration. However, the applicant must independently qualify under other criteria,including Section 11(3)(a) relating to prior experience. This is necessary to ensureefficient mining. [7.47]• Existing captive mines should be renewed if they have complied with the conditions<strong>of</strong> the lease and the life <strong>of</strong> the steel plant so warrants taking into account existing andplanned capacities. In the case <strong>of</strong> new capacities, the recommendations <strong>of</strong> Chapter 5will apply. [7.47]• Steel making capacities already in existence on 1 July <strong>2006</strong> that do not have captivemines may also be given preferential allocation <strong>of</strong> adequate iron ore reserves withinthe state without the need to go through the process <strong>of</strong> tender/auction, as a one-time217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!