National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines
National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines
• Rates of dead rent should be rationalised so that they act as an effective deterrentagainst a mine owner who does not undertake mining as per the approved mining planand prefers to keep large areas idle and keeps the mineral resources undeveloped. Inother words, an escalating scale of dead rent should be worked out. This should bestringently applied to captive miners and PSUs as well. [6.26]• The state governments would get revenues from the disposal of the ore bodies thathave been explored earlier at public expense by an open tender/auction system asexplained in Chapter 1. [6.26]• Transfer fees should be levied on PLs and MLs sought to be transferred. Asmentioned in Chapter 1, the unbundling of prospecting from mining is likely to bringin investment in the form of FDI into prospecting along with advanced technology.When the PL or ML of a prospected area is transferred for a premium by aprospecting firm in favour of a mining firm or if the firm itself is taken over oracquired by a mining firm for a consideration, a transfer fee as a percentage of thepremium or consideration may be levied. Such a step would be in line withinternational practice. The rates of transfer fee should be suggested by the next studygroup set up for making recommendations on royalty rates. [6.26]OTHER ISSUESRAISING FUNDS FOR PROSPECTING• The Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) in consultation with SEBIand the major stock exchanges should examine the possibility of providing a specialdispensation for mining sector companies on the lines of ASX and AIM and TSX’sTVE so that investment in prospecting companies is encouraged. ASX-type assistanceby way of improving investor communications, equity research, and appropriate indexsupport to the mining sector would help attract private equity funds to this sector. Thesectoral focus of private equity, including venture capital, and the financial marketsgenerally is at present on identified emerging growth sectors, viz. IT, ITeS, media,telecom, lately commercial real estate, etc. With excellent growth potential appearingon the horizon on account of the new mining dispensation it is imperative that the216
fund-raising environment for prospectors and miners moves in step to bring about thegrowth of mining. [7.14]ALLOCATION OF CAPTIVE MINES TO STEEL MAKERS• On the basis of current assumptions of demand and supply of iron ore in the countryand of the growth in both, India would have enough resources to last until the end ofthe twenty-first century and there is no basis for basing policy changes on theexhaustion of these resources in the near future. However, the position would need tobe kept under review and adjustments made in it in light of the emerging situationfrom time to time. The first review should take place after a period of 10 years, i.e. in2016–17. [7.34]• Stand alone mining and captive mining should continue to co-exist in the country. Theposition should be reviewed in 2016–17 in light of the emerging situation ofestablishment of steel capacity in the country, on the one hand, and accretions to thelevel of iron ore resources in the country, on the other. A view can be taken at thattime on whether the balance of advantage in the grant of LAPL/PL/ML should bechanged in favour of steel mills. [7.47]• Through appropriate changes in Section 11(3)(d) it should be clarified that in asituation of multiple applications for grant of iron ore LAPL/PL/ML, the existinginvestment in steel plants that have exhausted their current captive mines should be aconsideration. However, the applicant must independently qualify under other criteria,including Section 11(3)(a) relating to prior experience. This is necessary to ensureefficient mining. [7.47]• Existing captive mines should be renewed if they have complied with the conditionsof the lease and the life of the steel plant so warrants taking into account existing andplanned capacities. In the case of new capacities, the recommendations of Chapter 5will apply. [7.47]• Steel making capacities already in existence on 1 July 2006 that do not have captivemines may also be given preferential allocation of adequate iron ore reserves withinthe state without the need to go through the process of tender/auction, as a one-time217
- Page 176 and 177: 7.58 Export of iron ore fines on a
- Page 178 and 179: POLICY ON BEACH SAND MINERALS7.64 B
- Page 180 and 181: not contain more than 0.1 per cent
- Page 182 and 183: 7.73 On 18 January 2006, the DAE no
- Page 184 and 185: with the Centre is mainly to ensure
- Page 186 and 187: India enterprise) reported that the
- Page 188 and 189: chloride process pigment technology
- Page 190 and 191: are disposed of in the mined-out ar
- Page 192 and 193: directed to ensure that the AERB/AM
- Page 194 and 195: would have to be carefully drafted
- Page 196 and 197: ‘In coordination with the Geologi
- Page 198 and 199: Exploration Licences• The current
- Page 200 and 201: • The fees should be significantl
- Page 202 and 203: surveys have been undertaken, the P
- Page 204 and 205: automatic until the exhaustion of t
- Page 206 and 207: y stating in the MMDR Act that a pr
- Page 208 and 209: departmental representative for sec
- Page 210 and 211: therefore (under Rule 63A), pass su
- Page 212 and 213: • Section 12(1) of the MMDR Act s
- Page 214 and 215: o The lessee should not be asked to
- Page 216 and 217: again and the State Mines Departmen
- Page 218 and 219: • As in the past, no environmenta
- Page 220 and 221: oad and rail, and lack of long-term
- Page 222 and 223: government to the applicants who ar
- Page 224 and 225: next three-year period as well. In
- Page 228 and 229: measure to provide a level playing
- Page 230 and 231: • In respect of three titanium be
- Page 232 and 233: No-I&M-25(3)/2005Government of Indi
- Page 234 and 235: No-I&M-25(3)/2005Planning Commissio
- Page 236 and 237: ‘Efforts would also be made to gr
- Page 238 and 239: ecommending amendments to the Act a
- Page 240 and 241: etained as a Prescribed Substance u
- Page 242 and 243: OthersShri Arvind VarmaEx-Secretary
- Page 244 and 245: 16. Reserve Bank of India17. M/s Ji
- Page 246 and 247: the RP holders in areas beyond 25 s
- Page 248 and 249: Appendix ERecommendations of the Ex
- Page 250 and 251: (1) Provide proximate and strategic
- Page 252 and 253: technology to enter the Indian stee
- Page 254 and 255: Cross-country Comparison of Mining
- Page 256 and 257: Appendix F (cont.)Country Mining La
- Page 258 and 259: Cross-country Comparison of Mining
- Page 260 and 261: Appendix G (cont.)Country Mining le
- Page 262 and 263: CountryAppendix H (Cont.)Environmen
- Page 264 and 265: AustraliaIndonesia 9 4 Not specifie
- Page 266 and 267: Annexure 1 (cont.)Geologicalenviron
- Page 268 and 269: operations are undertaken over a fa
- Page 270 and 271: B. After Rule 54 of the Mineral Con
- Page 272 and 273: the Central Government to entertain
- Page 274 and 275: applications, could exercise the ju
fund-raising environment for prospectors and miners moves in step to bring about thegrowth <strong>of</strong> mining. [7.14]ALLOCATION OF CAPTIVE MINES TO STEEL MAKERS• On the basis <strong>of</strong> current assumptions <strong>of</strong> demand and supply <strong>of</strong> iron ore in the countryand <strong>of</strong> the growth in both, India would have enough resources to last until the end <strong>of</strong>the twenty-first century and there is no basis for basing policy changes on theexhaustion <strong>of</strong> these resources in the near future. However, the position would need tobe kept under review and adjustments made in it in light <strong>of</strong> the emerging situationfrom time to time. The first review should take place after a period <strong>of</strong> 10 years, i.e. in2016–17. [7.34]• Stand alone mining and captive mining should continue to co-exist in the country. Theposition should be reviewed in 2016–17 in light <strong>of</strong> the emerging situation <strong>of</strong>establishment <strong>of</strong> steel capacity in the country, on the one hand, and accretions to thelevel <strong>of</strong> iron ore resources in the country, on the other. A view can be taken at thattime on whether the balance <strong>of</strong> advantage in the grant <strong>of</strong> LAPL/PL/ML should bechanged in favour <strong>of</strong> steel mills. [7.47]• Through appropriate changes in Section 11(3)(d) it should be clarified that in asituation <strong>of</strong> multiple applications for grant <strong>of</strong> iron ore LAPL/PL/ML, the existinginvestment in steel plants that have exhausted their current captive mines should be aconsideration. However, the applicant must independently qualify under other criteria,including Section 11(3)(a) relating to prior experience. This is necessary to ensureefficient mining. [7.47]• Existing captive mines should be renewed if they have complied with the conditions<strong>of</strong> the lease and the life <strong>of</strong> the steel plant so warrants taking into account existing andplanned capacities. In the case <strong>of</strong> new capacities, the recommendations <strong>of</strong> Chapter 5will apply. [7.47]• Steel making capacities already in existence on 1 July <strong>2006</strong> that do not have captivemines may also be given preferential allocation <strong>of</strong> adequate iron ore reserves withinthe state without the need to go through the process <strong>of</strong> tender/auction, as a one-time217