12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

stealing <strong>of</strong> public property and should be a non-bailable, cognisable criminal <strong>of</strong>fence,for which, in the mineral-rich states, there should be special courts. [6.22]FISCAL REGIME AND ITS STABILITY• The constitutionality <strong>of</strong> the issue <strong>of</strong> whether the states can impose a cess on anymineral for which a royalty has been prescribed is currently under judicial scrutiny.The Committee would nevertheless observe that in considering the imposition <strong>of</strong> sucha cess in future, state governments should bear in mind the adverse impact on theinvestment environment in the state. [6.23]• To encourage exploration, which is a pre-mining activity, the Committee wouldrecommend that the current restriction <strong>of</strong> four years for allowing deduction <strong>of</strong>expenditure on exploration and development from the income tax should beeliminated. All expenditure on exploration and development in the preceding 10 yearsbefore the commencement <strong>of</strong> commercial production should be allowed for deductionin mining operations. Further, the mining companies should be given the option toclaim deduction either in the first 10 years <strong>of</strong> commercial production or during theuseful life <strong>of</strong> the mine. Clarity also needs to be brought in Section 35E <strong>of</strong> the IncomeTax Act, 1961 for set-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> unsuccessful exploration cost. [6.25]OTHER SOURCES OF REVENUE• A conscious decision needs to be taken to encourage physical value addition whichimproves ore quality and usage at pit mouth such as concentration, beneficiation,calibration, blending, etc. Wherever the miner adds value through these processes theroyalty may be charged on the ore at pit mouth on the cost <strong>of</strong> extraction beforeprocessing. Alternatively, the ad valorem rate for beneficiated or concentrated oreshould be proportionately lower, as in the case <strong>of</strong> beneficiated iron ore in WesternAustralia. [6.26]• The penalty for non-payment <strong>of</strong> royalty is cancellation <strong>of</strong> the concession. Amoratorium or a suitable structure for deferment <strong>of</strong> royalty payment to supportinvestment in deserving cases, to be spelt out clearly in the MCR, could also bepermitted in deserving cases. [6.26]215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!