12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MOEF is required in the case <strong>of</strong> renewals, the same should be granted without havingto go through the whole process <strong>of</strong> submitting a fresh proposal. [3.33]• Compensatory afforestation charges are prescribed by the state governments. Thesecharges vary widely across the states, and the criteria for fixing such charges arearbitrary. In order to have uniformity <strong>of</strong> approach, it has been suggested thatcompensatory afforestation charges be fixed by the Central government based on theforest area and topography <strong>of</strong> each state. Further, the compensatory afforestationcharges should be staggered over the entire lease period and collected on yearly basis.It is suggested that there should be no differentiation in the stipulation <strong>of</strong>compensatory afforestation charges in the leases <strong>of</strong> low-value and high-valueminerals. [3.34]• The State Forest <strong>Department</strong>s <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the states have issued instruction that formovement <strong>of</strong> minerals in the forest area, mining companies have to obtain a TransportPermit from the forest authorities by paying an additional royalty for specified majorand minor minerals. The mining industry is already burdened with various forestlevies, from NPV to compensatory afforestation charges. Any additional levies fortransportation in the forest area can have an adverse effect on the viability <strong>of</strong> miningoperations. [3.35]• At present, the processing takes place at multiple levels, which has made the forestclearance process extremely time consuming. In order to avoid unnecessary delays inthe processing <strong>of</strong> applications for diversion <strong>of</strong> forest land for mining, it is alsosuggested that the levels at the state government be reduced to three, i.e. DistrictForest Officer, Nodal Officer, and Secretary, State Forest <strong>Department</strong>. [3.36]Environment (Protection) Act (EPA), 1986• The time frame proposed in the draft notification <strong>of</strong> the MOEF <strong>of</strong> May <strong>2006</strong> worksout to 232 days, even after excluding the time required for preparation <strong>of</strong> EMP andthe final report. This proposed time frame is too long and is well beyond theinternational norm <strong>of</strong> up to 6 months (180 days) for granting environment clearances.There is scope for reducing this time frame. [3.44]207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!