National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

planningcommission.gov.in
from planningcommission.gov.in More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

are disposed of in the mined-out area or at other locations on the beaches, the backgroundradiation in those areas will increase. On the other hand, the tailings resulting from the initialconcentration of heavy minerals from raw sand through wet operations, i.e. spiral separation,generates primarily silica sand (80 per cent), and back filling of these tailings into the minedoutareas will have a net positive impact as far as radiological aspects are concerned.7.87 The concerns of radiological safety and the enforcement of the Atomic Energy(Radiation Protection) Rules, 2004 are addressed by AERB. Mineral separation andprocessing activities of BSMs need to be monitored so as to prevent exposure to radiationboth of occupational workers and the public in the mining area during operational as well aspost-operational periods. For this purpose, AERB stipulates the radiological safetyrequirements and enforces them through appropriate regulatory mechanisms. According tothe current dispensation, the tailings containing monazite are to be stored and disposed of bythe concerned company at its own cost and in accordance with the rules and regulationsframed by AERB. This condition is contained in the licence given by the DAE under theAtomic Energy Act.7.88 As mentioned earlier (paragraph 7.68), in the industry presentation to the Committeeit was stated that the procedures prescribed by AERB in the DAE licence are verycomplicated and severe. The reality on the ground does not call for such excessive action,which is a disincentive to mining of BSMs. It is true that tailings will get enriched inmonazite concentration consequent to the separation of values such as ilmenite, rutile, zircon,garnet, sillimanite, etc. and disposal of such tailings back into the mined-out areas couldresult in some increase in the background radiation levels in these areas. However, in mostcases, such increases in the background radiation levels are not significant. This is due to thefact that there is a sizeable variation in the radiation background levels in these areas fromlocation to location, even within short distances. The increased background radiation levelson account of tailings disposal are in many cases within the prevailing variations in theexisting radiation background levels. Also, many of the locations where beach sand miningand tailings disposal is being carried out presently are not inhabited areas. In the few caseswhere tailings disposal can give rise to significant increase in background radiation levels,appropriate disposal methods such as placing the tailings in a dug-out pit and providing acover of fresh soil can be specified.180

7.89 After the delisting of ilmenite as a Prescribed Substance, DAE has proposed that sincein the new dispensation there will be no licensing by DAE and since the work of radiationmonitoring has to continue, the Ministry of Mines should obtain licence/NOC from AERBunder the Atomic Energy (Radiation Protection) Rules, 2004 before granting approval of theCentral Government (as required for First Schedule, Part C minerals). According to theproposal of DAE, the MLs to be issued by the state governments must be subject toconditions imposed by AERB. This procedure is necessary to enable AERB to examine theproposals on a case-by-case basis and work out appropriate guidelines for tailings disposalfor each proposal as part of the licence issuing process. Further, possible radiation exposures,both external and internal, have to be evaluated by AERB while examining proposals for useof the tailings in road construction, civil construction, etc. Such applications should beforwarded by the state government to AERB. DAE maintains that it is difficult to haveeffective post closure control/surveillance over waste disposal practices and thereforesufficient safeguards have to be put in place. Some of the radio nuclides in the tailings have along half-life and the lease given to the operators may be of comparatively shorter durations.When the operation of a private sector facility ceases, the operator may close down thefacility and abandon the premises. In such cases, the authority issuing ML/industrial licencemust be in a position to take over the responsibility of the facility as well as the site that hadbeen subjected to the tailings disposal, if so specified by AERB. Appropriate mechanisms toensure this capability need to be put in place.7.90 It has been recommended in paragraph 7.76 that the three titanium bearing BSMscould be put in Part C of the First Schedule, so that approval by the Ministry of Mines isnecessary before any licence for prospecting or mining is granted. Irrespective of the positionin this regard, the current arrangement in respect of clearances under the Forest ConservationAct (1980) and the Environment Protection Act (1986) could be quite easily followed inrespect of these BSMs. All concessions are issued by the state governments subject to theapplicant obtaining the requisite clearances from the concerned authorities under the abovementionedstatutes. In this case also, the state governments should be required to issue thelicenses/leases subject to the applicants obtaining clearances under the Atomic Energy(Radiation Protection) Rules, 2004 and under the Atomic Energy (Safe Disposal ofRadioactive Wastes) Rules, 1987 from AERB. As recommended in paragraph 2.14 in respectof forest and environmental clearances, the PL/ML applicant could apply simultaneously tothe AERB to obtain the clearance from the radiation point of view. Further, states should be181

are disposed <strong>of</strong> in the mined-out area or at other locations on the beaches, the backgroundradiation in those areas will increase. On the other hand, the tailings resulting from the initialconcentration <strong>of</strong> heavy minerals from raw sand through wet operations, i.e. spiral separation,generates primarily silica sand (80 per cent), and back filling <strong>of</strong> these tailings into the minedoutareas will have a net positive impact as far as radiological aspects are concerned.7.87 The concerns <strong>of</strong> radiological safety and the enforcement <strong>of</strong> the Atomic Energy(Radiation Protection) Rules, 2004 are addressed by AERB. <strong>Mineral</strong> separation andprocessing activities <strong>of</strong> BSMs need to be monitored so as to prevent exposure to radiationboth <strong>of</strong> occupational workers and the public in the mining area during operational as well aspost-operational periods. For this purpose, AERB stipulates the radiological safetyrequirements and enforces them through appropriate regulatory mechanisms. According tothe current dispensation, the tailings containing monazite are to be stored and disposed <strong>of</strong> bythe concerned company at its own cost and in accordance with the rules and regulationsframed by AERB. This condition is contained in the licence given by the DAE under theAtomic Energy Act.7.88 As mentioned earlier (paragraph 7.68), in the industry presentation to the Committeeit was stated that the procedures prescribed by AERB in the DAE licence are verycomplicated and severe. The reality on the ground does not call for such excessive action,which is a disincentive to mining <strong>of</strong> BSMs. It is true that tailings will get enriched inmonazite concentration consequent to the separation <strong>of</strong> values such as ilmenite, rutile, zircon,garnet, sillimanite, etc. and disposal <strong>of</strong> such tailings back into the mined-out areas couldresult in some increase in the background radiation levels in these areas. However, in mostcases, such increases in the background radiation levels are not significant. This is due to thefact that there is a sizeable variation in the radiation background levels in these areas fromlocation to location, even within short distances. The increased background radiation levelson account <strong>of</strong> tailings disposal are in many cases within the prevailing variations in theexisting radiation background levels. Also, many <strong>of</strong> the locations where beach sand miningand tailings disposal is being carried out presently are not inhabited areas. In the few caseswhere tailings disposal can give rise to significant increase in background radiation levels,appropriate disposal methods such as placing the tailings in a dug-out pit and providing acover <strong>of</strong> fresh soil can be specified.180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!