National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

planningcommission.gov.in
from planningcommission.gov.in More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

• In the case of large mining operations, the ML would not lapse if minedevelopment did not take place in a period of two years.1.9 The major changes carried out in the two Rules were as follows:I. Mineral Concession Rules, 1960:• Rule 75(2) of MCR enabling the Agency System was deleted;• State governments could undertake prospecting or mining operations afternotification of areas;• Charging of premium by government companies in case of transfer of ML to aprivate venture was deleted.II. Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988:• State governments would approve mining plan in respect of 29 nonmetallic/industrialminerals for open cast mines (the remaining being retained withIBM);• Once approved, mining plan would be valid for the entire duration of the ML;• Relevant modifications, such as mining plan and mine closure plan, were made totake account of the qualitatively different impact on environment due toprospecting operations as compared to that of mining operations;• In addition to the tentative scheme of mining plan for the first five years of theML, an annual programme from year to year for five years would also besubmitted.Thus, after the Act was promulgated in 1957, the Act was amended four times, i.e. in 1972,1986, 1994, and 1999, and after each amendment corresponding changes were carried out inthe two Rules, viz. MCR and MCDR. While the first two amendments increasedgovernmental control, the last two relaxed them. The changes in the regulatory dispensationin 1994 and 1999 envisaged considerable devolution of authority from the Centre to thestates.LIBERALISATION OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT1.10 In the first 40 years after independence, FDI was not encouraged in the mining sector.Mineral concessions were restricted to companies with less than 40 per cent foreign holding,8

as in other sectors. With the formulation of the NMP in 1993 there was a slight easing up andFDI was allowed upto 50 per cent with no limit on captive mines. Additional FDI could alsobe allowed on a case-by-case basis. All FDI proposals required clearance by the ForeignInvestment Promotion Board (FIPB). In 1997, FDI upto 50 per cent was taken out of thepurview of the FIPB and put on automatic approval route. For exploration and mining ofdiamonds and precious stones FDI was allowed up to 74 per cent under automatic route inFebruary 2000. In February 2006, the mining sector was opened up to 100 per cent FDI.1.11 Mining is a three-stage operation, involving regional exploration, detailed exploration,and extraction (or mining proper). The first two, taken together, are also covered under thegeneric term ‘prospecting’. In India, the term ‘reconnaissance’ is used to cover the regionalexploration phase of prospecting. Mine development, which precedes extraction, is treated asa part of mining, as this work starts only after the ML is granted. Regional exploration ismainly a survey activity to identify areas bearing deposits through such means as geologicaland theme (geophysical and geochemical) mapping, aerial photography, satellite imagery,topographic and underground surveys, and some very limited geophysical exploration withsample drilling. The GSI conducts regional exploration in four phases, known as P1, P2, E1,and E2, which are distinguished mainly by the intensity of geophysical and geochemicalsurvey. As compared to regional exploration, detailed exploration is more intensive. Unlikeregional exploration, detailed exploration is invasive and involves close distance drilling,including slim hole drilling, large-scale mapping, and very substantial geophysical andgeochemical testing to establish economically recoverable ore bodies. The last phase ofregional exploration, viz. E2, overlaps with the first phase of detailed exploration in someways. Mining involves mine development (i.e. earthwork to access ore bodies) andextraction. Thus, mining projects, especially large ones, have a long gestation period andlarge amounts are spent in detailed exploration and other development activities beforecommercial production can begin.1.12 Prospecting, i.e. regional exploration and detailed exploration, is a high risk ventureinasmuch as the prospecting agency has to spend considerable amounts on activities that mayor may not result in finds of commercially exploitable deposits. Domestic entrepreneurstypically lack adequate financial and technical resources for entering into such high-riskventures. This became clear as investment in prospecting by the private sector failed tomaterialise despite the reforms in policy and statute opening up the sector to private9

as in other sectors. With the formulation <strong>of</strong> the NMP in 1993 there was a slight easing up andFDI was allowed upto 50 per cent with no limit on captive mines. Additional FDI could alsobe allowed on a case-by-case basis. All FDI proposals required clearance by the ForeignInvestment Promotion Board (FIPB). In 1997, FDI upto 50 per cent was taken out <strong>of</strong> thepurview <strong>of</strong> the FIPB and put on automatic approval route. For exploration and mining <strong>of</strong>diamonds and precious stones FDI was allowed up to 74 per cent under automatic route inFebruary 2000. In February <strong>2006</strong>, the mining sector was opened up to 100 per cent FDI.1.11 Mining is a three-stage operation, involving regional exploration, detailed exploration,and extraction (or mining proper). The first two, taken together, are also covered under thegeneric term ‘prospecting’. In India, the term ‘reconnaissance’ is used to cover the regionalexploration phase <strong>of</strong> prospecting. Mine development, which precedes extraction, is treated asa part <strong>of</strong> mining, as this work starts only after the ML is granted. Regional exploration ismainly a survey activity to identify areas bearing deposits through such means as geologicaland theme (geophysical and geochemical) mapping, aerial photography, satellite imagery,topographic and underground surveys, and some very limited geophysical exploration withsample drilling. The GSI conducts regional exploration in four phases, known as P1, P2, E1,and E2, which are distinguished mainly by the intensity <strong>of</strong> geophysical and geochemicalsurvey. As compared to regional exploration, detailed exploration is more intensive. Unlikeregional exploration, detailed exploration is invasive and involves close distance drilling,including slim hole drilling, large-scale mapping, and very substantial geophysical andgeochemical testing to establish economically recoverable ore bodies. The last phase <strong>of</strong>regional exploration, viz. E2, overlaps with the first phase <strong>of</strong> detailed exploration in someways. Mining involves mine development (i.e. earthwork to access ore bodies) andextraction. Thus, mining projects, especially large ones, have a long gestation period andlarge amounts are spent in detailed exploration and other development activities beforecommercial production can begin.1.12 Prospecting, i.e. regional exploration and detailed exploration, is a high risk ventureinasmuch as the prospecting agency has to spend considerable amounts on activities that mayor may not result in finds <strong>of</strong> commercially exploitable deposits. Domestic entrepreneurstypically lack adequate financial and technical resources for entering into such high-riskventures. This became clear as investment in prospecting by the private sector failed tomaterialise despite the reforms in policy and statute opening up the sector to private9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!