12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.73 On 18 January <strong>2006</strong>, the DAE notified the new list <strong>of</strong> Prescribed Substances. FourBSMs, viz. ilmenite, rutile, leucoxene, and zircon, will cease to be Prescribed Substancesfrom the date the MMDR Act is revised to fall in line with the new policy or from 1 January2007, whichever is earlier. The MMDR Act contains the First Schedule, which is a list <strong>of</strong>specified minerals under Sections 4(3), 5(1), 7(2), and 8(2). The Schedule is divided intothree Parts: A, B, and C. Part B contains a list <strong>of</strong> ‘Atomic <strong>Mineral</strong>s’. This list corresponds tothe list <strong>of</strong> Prescribed Substances under the Atomic Energy Act although the linkage is still tobe formalised. Once the four minerals mentioned above are deleted from the list <strong>of</strong> PrescribedSubstances, they will need to be deleted from Part B <strong>of</strong> the First Schedule as well. The DAEproposed that three <strong>of</strong> the four minerals, viz. ilmenite, rutile, and leucoxene, should be shiftedfrom Part B to Part C <strong>of</strong> the First Schedule, which means that they will not be atomicminerals any longer but will be treated as Scheduled major minerals, for which the approval<strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mines</strong> is required while granting concessions. The DAE also proposed thatthe fourth mineral, viz. zircon, should continue to be categorised as an atomic mineral underthe MMDR Act even though it is removed from the list <strong>of</strong> Prescribed Substances under theAtomic Energy Act. The implication is that mining concessions for zircon will be grantedonly on the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the DAE. The DAE further recommends that the policy <strong>of</strong>granting concessions in respect <strong>of</strong> ilmenite should continue to be restrictive in that onlyIndian companies should be allowed to mine ilmenite and foreign companies should not beallowed to mine ilmenite unless they also agree to add value. The DAE would like to see atitanium industry established in India so that titanium dioxide and titanium sponge startgetting produced in the country. The technology for making titanium is stated to be closelyheld and the thinking is that the raw material, viz. ilmenite, should be used to bring thattechnology to India.ISSUES RELATED TO BSM POLICY7.74 In the light <strong>of</strong> the above, the issues to be discussed and determined for arriving at asuitable BSM policy and changes required in the mining laws and rules are as follows:(i) The implications <strong>of</strong> shifting titanium bearing minerals (ilmenite, rutile, andleucoxene) to Part C <strong>of</strong> the First Schedule <strong>of</strong> the MMDR Act as recommendedby DAE;(ii) The implications <strong>of</strong> continuing zircon as an atomic mineral although it is nolonger a Prescribed Substance;172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!