12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

not contain more than 0.1 per cent <strong>of</strong> monazite (subsequently enhanced to 0.25 per cent). Anew Atomic Energy Act was legislated in 1962, which expanded on the definition <strong>of</strong>Prescribed Substances as substances that may be used for the production or use <strong>of</strong> atomicenergy or research into matters connected therewith and included uranium, plutonium,thorium, beryllium, deuterium, or any <strong>of</strong> their respective derivatives or compounds or anyother materials containing any <strong>of</strong> the aforesaid substances. Thereafter, in 1984, thegovernment notified the Atomic Energy (Working <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mines</strong>, <strong>Mineral</strong>s and Handling <strong>of</strong>Prescribed Substances) Rules, 1984. These rules provided that no person shall mine, mill,process, and/or handle any ore, mineral, or other material from which any one or more <strong>of</strong> thePrescribed Substances can be extracted, without obtaining a licence from the licensingauthority and except in accordance with the terms and conditions <strong>of</strong> such licence. The DAEhas since then been notifying the list <strong>of</strong> Prescribed Substances from time to time. The list <strong>of</strong>Prescribed Substances notified in 1995 included thorium with monazite, zirconium withzircon, and titanium ores with ilmenite, rutile, and leucoxene. This left out garnet andsillimanite among the BSMs that are major (non-Scheduled) minerals under the MCDR andout <strong>of</strong> the purview <strong>of</strong> the Atomic Energy Act and rules thereunder. However, since theirtailings contain the Prescribed Substances, the separation process and disposal are regulated.7.70 According to the IPR <strong>of</strong> 1956 and the Industrial <strong>Policy</strong> Statement <strong>of</strong> 1991, the activity<strong>of</strong> mining and separating BSMs was reserved for the public sector. However, keeping in viewthe liberalisation <strong>of</strong> the economy in the early 1990s and opening up <strong>of</strong> various hithertoreserved sectors to private investment, the DAE also formulated a new policy that wasnotified in October 1998. The policy was mainly driven by the realisation that despite Indiahaving large resources <strong>of</strong> BSMs, the production to reserve ratio (PRR) is the lowest in theworld. The need for promoting a primary titanium industry was also keenly felt in view <strong>of</strong> thecountry having the largest estimated reserves <strong>of</strong> ilmenite in the world, and also on account <strong>of</strong>the strategic importance <strong>of</strong> the metal. The 1998 policy, therefore, permitted the entry <strong>of</strong>wholly Indian owned companies from the private sector in each <strong>of</strong> the three activities, viz.mining, mineral separation, and value addition. FDI was permitted in pure value additionprojects (without mining and mineral separation) as well as in integrated projects comprisingmining, mineral separation, and value addition, subject to certain conditions. As a result <strong>of</strong>this change, some private sector entities did enter the beach sand mining industry but thescale <strong>of</strong> operations and the total number <strong>of</strong> investors were far from significant.7.71 A Conference on Beach Sand <strong>Mineral</strong> <strong>Policy</strong> organised by DAE in January 2005 forreviewing the working <strong>of</strong> the policy notified in October 1998 recommended that minerals like170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!