12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

also be a consideration. However, the applicant must independently qualify underother criteria, including Section 11(3)(a) relating to prior experience. This isnecessary to ensure efficient mining.3. Existing captive mines should be renewed if they have complied with theconditions <strong>of</strong> the lease and the life <strong>of</strong> the steel plant so warrants taking intoaccount existing and planned capacities. In the case <strong>of</strong> new capacities, therecommendations <strong>of</strong> Chapter 5 will apply.4. Steel making capacities already in existence on 1 July <strong>2006</strong> that do not havecaptive mines may also be given preferential allocation <strong>of</strong> adequate iron orereserves within the state without the need to go through the process <strong>of</strong>tender/auction, as a one-time measure to provide a level playing field. Theseexisting steel companies would have to enter into tie-ups with experienced miningcompanies so that they become eligible in terms <strong>of</strong> Section 11(3)(a) <strong>of</strong> the MMDRAct. Due regard should be given to the size <strong>of</strong> the steel making capacity whenconsidering allocation <strong>of</strong> a specific ore body.5. Scientific and vigorous prospecting in the country should be encouraged. LAPLsand PLs for magnetite may be freely given to both stand alone and captive miners,whether Indian or foreign. LAPLs for haematite may be given only after strictlyensuring that GSI or another state agency has not already done the requisiteexploration.6. Captive iron ore mines allotted to steel makers should use the ore from thesemines for their own steel and should not sell the same either in India or abroad.RESTRICTIONS ON THE EXPORT OF IRON ORE7.48 In the current EXIM policy, exports <strong>of</strong> higher grades <strong>of</strong> iron ore (above 64 per cent Fecontent, whether lumps or fines) are canalised through a State Trading Enterprise, the<strong>Mineral</strong> and Metals Trading Corporation (MMTC). Exports <strong>of</strong> iron ore with lower Fe contentare free and do not need a licence. Exports <strong>of</strong> iron ore <strong>of</strong> Goa origin for certain destinations(China, Europe, Japan, South Korea, and Japan) and <strong>of</strong> Redi origin for all destinations arealso free from export control, irrespective <strong>of</strong> Fe content. Separately, as envisaged inparagraph 2.11 <strong>of</strong> the chapter on the General Provisions on Imports and Exports in the EXIM<strong>Policy</strong>, export licences are issued by the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Commerce from time to time tomining companies, which hold MLs, for direct exports <strong>of</strong> iron ore <strong>of</strong> grades above 64 per centFe content. The NMDC, which is a Central PSU under the administrative control <strong>of</strong> theMinistry <strong>of</strong> Steel and has been exporting through MMTC, has decided that exports <strong>of</strong> NMDC160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!