National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines
National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines
must provide revenues sufficient to cover all these costs, pay taxes, and provide the investorwith a competitive rate of return on investments.6.13 Annexure 10 provides a comparative picture of the royalty rates prevailing in Indiaand in other countries, drawn up by the Royalty Rates Study Group in 2004, duly corrected totake into account the latest information available from Australia, which is one of the majormining countries of the world. Three of the countries with major or significant miningactivity—Canada, Chile, and South Africa—do not levy any royalty. In Australia, each of theseven states has its own royalty rates. In all the states, the rates are predominantly in advalorem terms, largely in the range of 2.5–5 per cent. In a few cases in the major mining stateof Western Australia, the rate is 7.5 per cent for some important minerals such as iron orelumps, manganese, bauxite, diamonds, and precious stones. One state, the NorthernTerritories, is an outlier in having a uniform rate of royalty of 18 per cent for all products.One feature of the royalty rates in Western Australia is that the ad valorem rates are lower forbeneficiated iron ore.6.14 In Asia, two countries, viz. China and Indonesia, have significant mining activity. InChina, the royalty rates are predominantly 2 per cent, some of the major exceptions beinggold and precious stones at 4 per cent. In Indonesia, the royalty rates are mostly in the rangeof 3–5 per cent, except for diamond, for which the royalty rate is 6.5 per cent. In CentralAsia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are two important mineral states. In Kazakhstan, for mostimportant minerals the rates are established through negotiations for each contract dependingupon the viability of the project. In Uzbekistan, the rates are generally very low, except forcopper (7.9 per cent), diamond (24 per cent), tungsten concentrate (8 per cent), and kaolin(7.9 per cent). African countries generally have low royalties, except for diamond andprecious stones, for which the rate is 10 per cent generally.6.15 A study of the royalty rate systems in other countries shows some other features aswell. In some countries, each mineral type is taxed at a different rate (such as in theapplication of a royalty assigned to each mineral type) or minerals are grouped and eachgroup is uniformly taxed (typical groupings include industrial and construction materials,fertiliser minerals, precious metals, precious stones, base metals, non-petroleum energyminerals, etc.). To some extent, the level of discrimination may depend on whether themineral is destined for a globally competitive market or for the local market. For example,126
ase metals are often taxed at a lower rate than low-value bulk commodities like sand andgravel, reflecting the fact that investment in base metals is highly dependent on foreigninvestors who have many countries to choose from when making their investment decisions,compared to sand and gravel, where mainly domestic investors are active. Governments mayalso adjust their tax systems in an attempt to impose higher taxes on minerals, such asdiamonds, which are expected to generate higher profit levels. In fact, in addition to advalorem royalty, profit based royalty may also be imposed on a diamond mine in order to geta better share of revenues from such ventures.6.16 Judged from the angle of internationally competitive royalty rates there would appearto be scope for upward revision only in a few minerals such as manganese ore and iron ore.In several products, the Indian royalty rates are higher than those of other countries. Thisdoes not necessarily mean that the rates should be considered for lowering, as thecomparative cost of mining operations in India should also be taken into account. Only inthose cases in which there is evidence that the rates are inhibiting mining operations shouldsuch a step be considered.6.17 When rates are fixed in ad valorem terms the question arises as to how the value ofthe mineral should be determined for applying the percentage rates. Box 6.1 gives themethods of valuation in vogue in Western Australia, for which full details of the practice areavailable.127
- Page 86 and 87: affected PAPs in the mining operati
- Page 88 and 89: that a well-regulated and responsib
- Page 90 and 91: (iii)Notwithstanding the above, sur
- Page 92 and 93: egard, all ‘forest’ land must b
- Page 94 and 95: Figure 3.1: Procedure for Processin
- Page 96 and 97: should be authorised to grant or re
- Page 98 and 99: formulation and appraisal of the EI
- Page 100 and 101: 3.41 Recognising the need to make t
- Page 102 and 103: Figure 3.3: Public Hearing/NOC from
- Page 104 and 105: Chapter 4Infrastructure Needs and F
- Page 106 and 107: 4.5 Logistics is the key to access
- Page 108 and 109: Table 4.1: Mineral Production in In
- Page 110 and 111: necessary, therefore, that in infra
- Page 112 and 113: to the ports of Haldia and Paradip
- Page 114 and 115: Connectivity of Major Ports, brough
- Page 116 and 117: (iv)(v)(vi)(vii)At Visakhapatnam Po
- Page 118 and 119: was of the opinion that while the m
- Page 120 and 121: such an arrangement, the Ministry o
- Page 122 and 123: developed, controlled, and run by s
- Page 124 and 125: subject to overt and covert restric
- Page 126 and 127: consideration to the end use of the
- Page 128 and 129: (iii)parameters laid down in existi
- Page 130 and 131: Chapter 6Augmenting State Revenues(
- Page 132 and 133: the value addition question conside
- Page 134 and 135: In a system of ad valorem rates of
- Page 138 and 139: Box 6.1: Methods of Valuation of Ro
- Page 140 and 141: Another point to be borne in mind b
- Page 142 and 143: ailable, cognisable criminal offenc
- Page 144 and 145: e worked out. This should be string
- Page 146 and 147: 7.3 Considering the high-risk natur
- Page 148 and 149: Table 7.2: Minimum Listing Requirem
- Page 150 and 151: (ii)(iii)only. Such funds have not
- Page 152 and 153: addition, the minimum post-issue fa
- Page 154 and 155: and hence this ore should be conser
- Page 156 and 157: miners distort the market for their
- Page 158 and 159: 7.22 The current law does not make
- Page 160 and 161: is mostly of low grade magnetite. H
- Page 162 and 163: Most magnetite findings are entirel
- Page 164 and 165: in UK 206 kg, and in China it grew
- Page 166 and 167: metres. The use of down hole drill
- Page 168 and 169: 7.42 Despite the fact that SME mini
- Page 170 and 171: also be a consideration. However, t
- Page 172 and 173: price, reduce profitability, and pu
- Page 174 and 175: IMPACT ON DOMESTIC IRON ORE PRICES
- Page 176 and 177: 7.58 Export of iron ore fines on a
- Page 178 and 179: POLICY ON BEACH SAND MINERALS7.64 B
- Page 180 and 181: not contain more than 0.1 per cent
- Page 182 and 183: 7.73 On 18 January 2006, the DAE no
- Page 184 and 185: with the Centre is mainly to ensure
must provide revenues sufficient to cover all these costs, pay taxes, and provide the investorwith a competitive rate <strong>of</strong> return on investments.6.13 Annexure 10 provides a comparative picture <strong>of</strong> the royalty rates prevailing in Indiaand in other countries, drawn up by the Royalty Rates Study Group in 2004, duly corrected totake into account the latest information available from Australia, which is one <strong>of</strong> the majormining countries <strong>of</strong> the world. Three <strong>of</strong> the countries with major or significant miningactivity—Canada, Chile, and South Africa—do not levy any royalty. In Australia, each <strong>of</strong> theseven states has its own royalty rates. In all the states, the rates are predominantly in advalorem terms, largely in the range <strong>of</strong> 2.5–5 per cent. In a few cases in the major mining state<strong>of</strong> Western Australia, the rate is 7.5 per cent for some important minerals such as iron orelumps, manganese, bauxite, diamonds, and precious stones. One state, the NorthernTerritories, is an outlier in having a uniform rate <strong>of</strong> royalty <strong>of</strong> 18 per cent for all products.One feature <strong>of</strong> the royalty rates in Western Australia is that the ad valorem rates are lower forbeneficiated iron ore.6.14 In Asia, two countries, viz. China and Indonesia, have significant mining activity. InChina, the royalty rates are predominantly 2 per cent, some <strong>of</strong> the major exceptions beinggold and precious stones at 4 per cent. In Indonesia, the royalty rates are mostly in the range<strong>of</strong> 3–5 per cent, except for diamond, for which the royalty rate is 6.5 per cent. In CentralAsia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are two important mineral states. In Kazakhstan, for mostimportant minerals the rates are established through negotiations for each contract dependingupon the viability <strong>of</strong> the project. In Uzbekistan, the rates are generally very low, except forcopper (7.9 per cent), diamond (24 per cent), tungsten concentrate (8 per cent), and kaolin(7.9 per cent). African countries generally have low royalties, except for diamond andprecious stones, for which the rate is 10 per cent generally.6.15 A study <strong>of</strong> the royalty rate systems in other countries shows some other features aswell. In some countries, each mineral type is taxed at a different rate (such as in theapplication <strong>of</strong> a royalty assigned to each mineral type) or minerals are grouped and eachgroup is uniformly taxed (typical groupings include industrial and construction materials,fertiliser minerals, precious metals, precious stones, base metals, non-petroleum energyminerals, etc.). To some extent, the level <strong>of</strong> discrimination may depend on whether themineral is destined for a globally competitive market or for the local market. For example,126