12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and/or make presentations detailing their perceptions in respect <strong>of</strong> the various terms <strong>of</strong>reference <strong>of</strong> the Committee. The Committee viewed the presentations and held exhaustivediscussions on the issues raised by the stakeholders.4. The Committee studied the various reports prepared and submitted by study groupsand in-house committees set up by various ministries from time to time on the issues beforethe Committee. In the main, these included a Review Paper on the findings andrecommendations <strong>of</strong> all previous committees set up by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mines</strong> from time totime, including the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the committee set up in 2005 under the chairmanship<strong>of</strong> the Additional Secretary, Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mines</strong> to recommend changes in the MMDR Act,<strong>Mineral</strong> Concession Rules, 1960 (MCR), and <strong>Mineral</strong> Conservation and Development Rules,1958 (MCDR), the steel ministry’s Dang Committee report on the allocation <strong>of</strong> iron oremines [along with the dissenting note <strong>of</strong> the Federation <strong>of</strong> Indian <strong>Mineral</strong> Industries (FIMI)],and the policy paper <strong>of</strong> the Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mines</strong> on the same subject.5. The Committee gave consideration to the mineral policies <strong>of</strong> the states as presentedby the state governments, especially to the differing perceptions <strong>of</strong> mineral-rich and nonmineral-richstates. The Committee also gave consideration to the papers prepared by FIMI,which provided comparative analyses <strong>of</strong> the mineral policies and statutes <strong>of</strong> other majormineral producing countries in the world such as Australia, Canada, Chile, and South Africa,the changes in these policies and statutes over time, and the lessons that could be drawn fromthem.6. The presentations submitted to the Committee are listed in Appendix C. The Reports<strong>of</strong> in-house committees etc. are listed in Appendices D and E. The paper on comparativeanalysis <strong>of</strong> the mineral policies <strong>of</strong> other countries may be seen at Appendices F–I.7. The Report is presented in eight chapters. The first seven chapters deal with the seventerms <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>of</strong> the Committee respectively. In each case, the issues are spelt out, thearguments <strong>of</strong> the concerned interest groups examined, and the recommendations are laid out.In Chapter 7, important issues raised in the Committee that are not covered by the first sixterms <strong>of</strong> reference are taken up. These include four important issues whose resolution wouldbe important not only for stimulating investment flows and inducting state-<strong>of</strong>-the-arttechnology but also for the smooth functioning <strong>of</strong> mining operations in the country. These3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!