12.07.2015 Views

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

National Mineral Policy 2006 - Department of Mines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

developed, controlled, and run by stand alone prospectors and miners, the policy <strong>of</strong> thesestates is proving to be a substantial dampener on the investment and growth prospects <strong>of</strong> themining sector. The Committee carefully examined the presentations from the mineral-richstates in support <strong>of</strong> the conditionality <strong>of</strong> value addition as well as the submissions from theindustry opposing the approach. The policy is also objected to by those states that aredeficient in mineral resources but provide an environment more conducive for theestablishment <strong>of</strong> end-use industry. For releasing the vast potential <strong>of</strong> India’s mining industryit is important to resolve this issue.PROS AND CONS OF VALUE ADDITION AS A CONDITION FOR MININGCONCESSION5.3 The arguments in favour <strong>of</strong> the requirement for value addition can be summarised asfollows. <strong>Mineral</strong>s belong to the state in which they occur. It so happens that India’s mainmineral-rich states are relatively less industrialised than others. The poor but mineral-richstates would like to maximise the economic return from their mineral resources by usingmineral concessions as a tool for attracting industry. For many years, states have beencompeting with each other for attracting industry by granting various incentives, mainly inthe form <strong>of</strong> sales tax concessions. With the introduction <strong>of</strong> state Value Added Tax (VAT), thesales tax exemption option for granting incentives has been closed and states are struggling t<strong>of</strong>ind other ways in which industries can be incentivised to get established within theirterritories. <strong>Mineral</strong> concessions, especially MLs for exploiting proven ore bodies explored bystate agencies at public expense, can be leveraged to locate an industrial unit in the statewhere the resource is mined.5.4 Another important argument in favour <strong>of</strong> value addition within the state is thatmineral-owning states need to find a way in which they can increase their financial resourcesfrom the exploitation <strong>of</strong> minerals. The current dispensation allows virtually free mineralconcessions and the royalty paid is very meagre. Downstream industries not only generateadditional economic activity and employment but also widen the base for collection <strong>of</strong> taxes.This issue is dealt with in detail in Chapter 6, which suggests various ways in which thestates’ revenues should be augmented.112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!