30 Theoretical foundationsOhlson (2005) and Ohlson & Juettner-Nauroth (2005) utilize the RIV formula(3.9) together with identity (3.10) to derive the AEG valuation model, which ismathematically equivalent to the RIV model. Formally,( NI )∞equityEtt+i 1 ⎡equityi−1⎤vt = + ⋅ ( 1 requity equity) Et( AEGt+i)r r⎢∑ + ⋅ ⎥ (3.12)⎣ i=2⎦equitywhere vtis the intrinsic value of common equity at time t, ( t 1)expected net income in period t+i, ( )tt iE NI +is theE AEG +is the expected growth in abnormalequityearnings in period t+i both conditional on information available at time t, and ris the cost of equity, indicated as a constant.From a theoretical point of view, the AEG model embeds two distinct advantagescompared to the RIV model. First, we obtain a valuation, which is equivalentto the RIV framework, but without having to forecast book value of equity; the balancesheet drops out. Growth in book value of equity, modeled under RIV, is simplynet income minus dividends. Hence, by forecasting net income and dividends,that is, abnormal earnings growth, the change in book value is redundant. Second,although derived from the clean surplus relation, the AEG model in formula (3.12),eventually, does not require clean surplus accounting (Penman 2005, p. 369-370).Practically orientated, the AEG model coincides with investment practice whereequity valuation revolves around earnings and their subsequent growth (Ohlson2005, p. 342).As any fundamental equity valuation model, the AEG also comes with somereservations. Technically, Ohlson (2005) and Ohlson & Juettner-Nauroth (2005) setequityB = E ( NI )/ r arbitrarily. However, in reality, no economic justification existst t t+ito start a valuation at the steady state, and then to allow for abnormal earnings inequitysubsequent periods. What is more, Et( NIt+ i) / r , the anchor in the AEG model, isnot actually a number which can be found in the financial statements. It is a forecast,based on speculation. In contrast, RIV follows the fundamentalists’ dictate todistinguish what is known (in the financial statements) from speculation, by anchoringon book value of equity and then adding speculation about future residual in-
Theoretical foundations 31come. Besides that, no empirical evidence on the performance neither for the AEGmodel nor its simplification as proposed in Ohlson & Juettner-Nauroth (2005) existso far.Taking the practical limitations of the presented fundamental equity valuationmodels into account, it is difficult to argue that practitioners ought to rely on eitherthe DDM, DCF, RIV, or AEG method when it comes to real world applications. Infact, we now understand why so many practitioners revert to the market-based multiplesvaluation approach.3.2 Derivation of intrinsic multiplesIn general, the valuation literature discusses two broad approaches to estimatingthe value of firms. The first is fundamental equity valuation, in which the valueof a firm is estimated directly from its expected future payoffs without appeal to thecurrent market value of other firms. Fundamental equity valuation models are basedon dividends, (free) cash flows, or (abnormal) earnings, and involve the computationof the present value of expected future payoffs – explained before for theDDM, DCF, RIV, and AEG method. 11 The second is market-based valuation, inwhich value estimates are obtained by examining market values of comparablefirms. This approach involves applying a synthetic market multiple (e.g., the P/Emultiple) from the comparable firms to the corresponding value driver (e.g., earnings)of the firm being valued to secure a value estimate (Bhojaj & Lee 2002, p.413-414). 12In market-based valuation, sometimes also referred to as relative valuation, atarget’s firm value equals the product of a synthetic peer group multiple and the tar-11 This book does not discuss liquidation valuation, in which a firm is valued at the “break-up”value of its asset. Commonly used in valuing firms in financial distress, this fundamental equityvaluation method is not appropriate for most going concerns (Bhojraj & Lee 2002, p. 413).12 A third approach, not covered in this book, is contingent claim valuation based on option pricingtheory. Interested readers may refer to standard corporate finance textbooks such as Brealy &Myers (2000) chapter 21, Damodaran (2001) chapter 11, Copeland, Weston & Shastri (2004) chapter9, Koller, Goedhart & Wessels (2005) chapter 20, or Spremann (2005) chapter 8 to get a basicunderstanding.
- Page 1 and 2: Equity Valuation Using Multiples:An
- Page 4 and 5: IVForewordframework. Schreiner demo
- Page 6 and 7: VIPrefacement from my friends, whic
- Page 8 and 9: Brief contents1 Introduction ......
- Page 10 and 11: ContentsForeword...................
- Page 12 and 13: XIIContents4.5 Actual valuation....
- Page 14 and 15: List of figures 1Figure 1.1: Valuat
- Page 16 and 17: Notations and abbreviationsPrice an
- Page 18 and 19: XVIIINotations and abbreviationsM&A
- Page 20 and 21: 2 Introductiongroup multiples must
- Page 22 and 23: 4 Introductionexpenditures, amortiz
- Page 24 and 25: 6 Introductiontion, therefore, aims
- Page 26 and 27: 8 Introduction• Research question
- Page 28 and 29: 10 Introductionscope of the solutio
- Page 30 and 31: 12 IntroductionFigure 1.2: Outline
- Page 32 and 33: 14 Literature reviewto earnings gro
- Page 34 and 35: 16 Literature reviewserved market v
- Page 36 and 37: 18 Literature reviewmultiple for ea
- Page 38 and 39: 20 Literature reviewthe other. Chen
- Page 40 and 41: 3 Theoretical foundationsShareholde
- Page 42 and 43: 24 Theoretical foundationsferred to
- Page 44 and 45: 26 Theoretical foundationswherev is
- Page 46 and 47: 28 Theoretical foundationsholders a
- Page 50 and 51: 32 Theoretical foundationsget firm'
- Page 52 and 53: 34 Theoretical foundationsIn order
- Page 54 and 55: 36 Theoretical foundationsRI D Bequ
- Page 56 and 57: 38 Theoretical foundationsFigure 3.
- Page 58 and 59: 40 Theoretical foundationsThe loose
- Page 60 and 61: 42 Theoretical foundationscomings,
- Page 62 and 63: 44 Theoretical foundationsability c
- Page 64 and 65: 46 Theoretical foundationsposure to
- Page 66 and 67: 4 Comprehensive multiples valuation
- Page 68 and 69: 50 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 70 and 71: 52 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 72 and 73: 54 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 74 and 75: 56 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 76 and 77: 58 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 78 and 79: 60 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 80 and 81: 62 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 82 and 83: 64 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 84 and 85: 66 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 86 and 87: 68 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 88 and 89: 70 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 90 and 91: 72 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 92 and 93: 74 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 94 and 95: 76 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 96 and 97: 78 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 98 and 99:
80 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 100 and 101:
82 Comprehensive multiples valuatio
- Page 102 and 103:
5 Design of the empirical studyThe
- Page 104 and 105:
86 Design of the empirical studytio
- Page 106 and 107:
88 Design of the empirical studypir
- Page 108 and 109:
90 Design of the empirical study5.3
- Page 110 and 111:
92 Design of the empirical studyCha
- Page 112 and 113:
94 Design of the empirical studyand
- Page 114 and 115:
96 Design of the empirical studyass
- Page 116 and 117:
6 Empirical resultsThe following ch
- Page 118 and 119:
100 Empirical resultsous multiples
- Page 120 and 121:
102 Empirical resultsvalue multiple
- Page 122 and 123:
104 Empirical results6.1.3 Knowledg
- Page 124 and 125:
106 Empirical resultsknowledge-rela
- Page 126 and 127:
108 Empirical resultsTable 6.4: Per
- Page 128 and 129:
110 Empirical results6.1.5 The effe
- Page 130 and 131:
112 Empirical resultsThe second tes
- Page 132 and 133:
114 Empirical results6.2.1 Industry
- Page 134 and 135:
116 Empirical resultsExamination of
- Page 136 and 137:
118 Empirical resultscoefficients a
- Page 138 and 139:
120 Empirical results• The simple
- Page 140 and 141:
122 Empirical resultsTable 6.11: Co
- Page 142 and 143:
124 Empirical resultshowever, lapse
- Page 144 and 145:
126 Empirical resultsoped equity ma
- Page 146 and 147:
128 Conclusionmultiples, in particu
- Page 148 and 149:
130 Conclusion7.3 Research outlookE
- Page 150 and 151:
132 Appendix A: ICB industry classi
- Page 152 and 153:
134 Appendix A: ICB industry classi
- Page 154 and 155:
136 Appendix B: U.S. evidenceEquity
- Page 156 and 157:
138 Appendix B: U.S. evidencePerfor
- Page 158 and 159:
140 Appendix B: U.S. evidencePerfor
- Page 160 and 161:
142 Appendix B: U.S. evidencePerfor
- Page 162 and 163:
144 Appendix B: U.S. evidencePerfor
- Page 164 and 165:
146 Appendix B: U.S. evidenceIndust
- Page 166 and 167:
148 Appendix B: U.S. evidenceFactor
- Page 168 and 169:
150 Appendix B: U.S. evidenceTime s
- Page 170 and 171:
152 Appendix C: Definition of varia
- Page 172 and 173:
ReferencesAboody, D., 2006. Financi
- Page 174 and 175:
156 ReferencesBernard, V.L., Thomas
- Page 176 and 177:
158 ReferencesDamodaran, A., 2001.
- Page 178 and 179:
160 ReferencesFama, E.F., 1976. Fou
- Page 180 and 181:
162 ReferencesGuo, R.-J., Lev, B.,
- Page 182 and 183:
164 ReferencesLev, B., Nissim, D.,
- Page 184 and 185:
166 ReferencesO’Hanlon, J., Peasn
- Page 186 and 187:
168 ReferencesRoss, S.A., Westerfie
- Page 188:
Curriculum VitaeName:Born:Andreas S