02.12.2012 Views

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 May 2009 Local Government (Auckland Reorganisation) Bill 3703<br />

now ruled out of order—because we have just passed that amendment in the name of<br />

the Hon Rodney Hide.<br />

Hon David Cunliffe: Could you elaborate?<br />

The CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch): No. It is written down here, and the<br />

member has a copy of this. We are not getting into discussion on this, because we have<br />

just passed it and it is not debatable. I refer the member to the amendment we have just<br />

passed, which now means that subsequent ones are out of order.<br />

Hon TREVOR MALLARD (Labour—Hutt South): I raise a point of order, Mr<br />

Chairperson. This is a new point of order, and it goes to the wording of the Rodney<br />

Hide amendment—the longer one—where throughout it there is mention of<br />

“provisions”. Probably unfortunately for Mr Hide, within at least one of the new part’s<br />

amendments “provisions” are not mentioned but there are “sections”. So although<br />

“provisions” is widely used within a number of the amendments, one particular set of<br />

amendments has “sections”, and it is my submission to you, Mr Chairperson, that that<br />

set of amendments is not ruled out by the Hide amendment.<br />

The CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch): The substance of the amendments and the<br />

substance of the Minister’s amendment are the same. That is why the others have been<br />

ruled out.<br />

HONE HARAWIRA (Māori Party—Te Tai Tokerau): I raise a point of order, Mr<br />

Chairperson. You advised that the Minister’s amendment ruled other amendments out<br />

of order. Are you able to tell us what the other amendments were?<br />

The CHAIRPERSON (Lindsay Tisch): I say to the member that the other<br />

amendments are tabled. They are available for the member to peruse; they have been on<br />

the Table for some time. They are there for him if he wishes to have a look at them.<br />

The same amendment that we have just passed means that other amendments have<br />

been ruled out. They are in the name of Jacinda Ardern, Dr Ashraf Choudhary, and<br />

Raymond Huo.<br />

The question was put that the following amendment in the name of the Hon Parekura<br />

Horomia be agreed to:<br />

to insert the following new part:<br />

Part 5<br />

Mechanisms to ensure representation of Māori, Pacific and Ethnic groups in the<br />

reorganisation of the Auckland Council<br />

Subpart 1<br />

Guarantees Māori representation on the Auckland Council by directing the Auckland<br />

Transition Agency to establish Māori seats<br />

71<br />

(1) Two Māori members are to be elected to the Auckland Council by voters who are<br />

on the parliamentary Māori electoral roll<br />

(a) The 2 Māori seats shall not be removed from the Auckland Council unless—<br />

(i) a referendum of Māori voters on the parliamentary Māori electoral roll<br />

is held; and<br />

(ii) 75% of those voters vote in favour of removing the seats.<br />

(2) Directs the Auckland Transition Agency to establish a Mana Whenua Forum, the<br />

members of which will be appointed by mana whenua from the district of the<br />

Auckland Council<br />

(a) The Mana Whenua Forum should—<br />

(i) appoint a representative to be a councillor on the Auckland Council:<br />

(ii) through its representative on the Auckland Council, advise the<br />

Auckland Council on issues of relevance to mana whenua:<br />

(b) The Mana Whenua seat shall not be removed from the Auckland<br />

Council unless 75% of Mana Whenua Forum members vote in favour<br />

of removing the seat.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!