02.12.2012 Views

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3758 Local Government (Auckland Council) Bill 16 May 2009<br />

me to ensure that the Minister moves the motion correctly as signalled to the House and<br />

as advised to the Clerk.<br />

The matter now is where the motion was at the point that the member raised the point<br />

of order. It is argued by the Hon Trevor Mallard that the motion was in the possession<br />

of the House, and only the House could change it. I disagree. I think the motion is<br />

within the control of the presiding officer, in the same way as amendments that come<br />

before the House are: the presiding officer decides whether they are in order or out of<br />

order. That is not a matter for the House to decide itself. Deciding whether a motion is<br />

in order or out of order is the sole preserve of the presiding officer. When that motion<br />

was moved, I as the presiding officer decided that the motion was out of order. I then<br />

required the member to correct the motion to ensure it was consistent with what the<br />

member had said after he moved the first reading, and consistent with what the member<br />

had said to the Clerk.<br />

Had the mistake not been spotted and had the new motion gone through the House,<br />

been a motion of the House, and been decided, it would then have been the House’s<br />

decision. But it was not. The motion rested with me and it was within my realm to put<br />

it, or not, and to ensure it was correct. In my view it is for the presiding officer to ensure<br />

the motion is accurate. That has been done. The motion now before the House is as read<br />

out by the Hon Rodney Hide: that the Local Government (Auckland Council) Bill be<br />

considered by the Auckland Governance Legislation Committee, and that the committee<br />

report finally to the House on or before 4 September 2009. That is the motion, and it is<br />

the only motion that can be moved according to the Standing Orders. I so put the<br />

motion.<br />

A party vote was called for on the question, That the Local Government (Auckland<br />

Council) Bill be considered by the Auckland Governance Legislation Committee, and<br />

that the committee report finally to the House on or before 4 September 2009.<br />

Ayes 64<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> National 58; ACT <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> 5; United Future 1.<br />

Noes 51<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> Labour 42; Green Party 5; Māori Party 4.<br />

Motion agreed to.<br />

The ASSISTANT SPEAKER (Hon Rick Barker): I take this opportunity to wish<br />

members safe travel home. Nō reira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou. Pō mārie.<br />

The House adjourned at 9.42 p.m. (Saturday)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!