Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3740 Local Government (Auckland Council) Bill 16 May 2009<br />
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE: I am getting to that.<br />
Mr DEPUTY SPEAKER: OK.<br />
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE: I will carry on with my speech, because that, in fact, was<br />
my next point. When Gerry Brownlee is in trouble, he turns to the cavalry from the<br />
north. “Hone Carter” might not look flash, but he trotted over the hill just in time to<br />
save Gerry’s bacon from a humiliating defeat. Let us hear it for John Carter tonight! He<br />
should have been the Leader of the House.<br />
Of course, the most important lesson of the week is the lesson for John Key—<br />
amongst others he has probably learnt—and that is not to delegate something as<br />
sensitive as this to Rodney Hide and expect that everything will be OK. It is one thing<br />
to treat a minor party as expendable, and it is one thing to come to politics as though it<br />
is a corporation where one can just delegate to someone, and if it does not work out, one<br />
can sack that person, but politics does not work like that, because Kiwis remember.<br />
The analysts out there in media-land are saying that John Key has over-delegated this<br />
one. He has let Mr Hide run it, and Mr Hide has run into a buzz saw of public anger,<br />
and a buzz saw of opposition in the House, which was good-spirited but none the less<br />
determined. One hopes that Mr Key has learnt some other lessons this week, such as the<br />
fact that there is no way he can stop Melissa Lee from putting both feet in her mouth,<br />
even if he Velcros her to Jonathan Coleman. There are other lessons, too. He should not<br />
rub his finance Minister’s face in it, and still think they can look unified at Budget time,<br />
and he should not count out an energised Labour - Green - Māori Party coalition,<br />
because members might be seeing another one in the future, and it might be sitting on<br />
that side of the House.<br />
If Mr Hide thinks people are angry, he should keep his stumpy little bling-encrusted<br />
fingers off our city, because we care about Aucklanders, and Aucklanders care about<br />
Greater Auckland and the cities that make it up. I also advise him not to count his<br />
chickens.<br />
Paul Quinn: Hallelujah!<br />
Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE: There is also a lesson for the member from<br />
Wainuiōmata, Paul Quinn. When he has had a good time it is best to stay out of the<br />
House after tea. That is the lesson for the member from Wainuiōmata.<br />
Here is the final lesson for the future. If members have rammed through governance<br />
reform like this to make the way clear for Mr Lotu-Iiga to finally have one job when<br />
other people are looking for them, and if members think they have paved the way for<br />
John Banks to ride into the Auckland Council, they should remember that Aucklanders<br />
make up their own minds. Every Aucklander, at that city’s next election poll, will<br />
identify John Banks with the bill that stole their cities, and they will say: “If there is one<br />
way we can protest against this bulldozing National Government, it is to make sure that<br />
‘Banksie’ is not the mega-mayor.” So this debate does not finish tonight, and it does not<br />
finish this year. The fight-back starts now.<br />
SUE KEDGLEY (Green): I also start by expressing the gratitude of the Green Party<br />
to all the staff in <strong>Parliament</strong> who have kept the place going over the last few days. I<br />
hope they understand that it was a protest. It was a protest against the slashing and<br />
gutting of democracy in Auckland, and against the profoundly undemocratic way in<br />
which this far-reaching bill—which will obliterate layers of democracy in Auckland—<br />
was whacked through this House without any ability for the people of Auckland to have<br />
select committee hearings or to be consulted in any way. I hope the staff of <strong>Parliament</strong><br />
and the people of <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> understand that that is what it was about: it was a<br />
protest. What did the Government expect us to do? Did it expect us just to stand by<br />
while this Draconian legislation was being rammed through the House?