02.12.2012 Views

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3738 Local Government (Auckland Council) Bill 16 May 2009<br />

is a great day for Auckland. It is a great day for the country. It is a great day for<br />

democracy. I support all those things.<br />

Hon DAVID CUNLIFFE (Labour—<strong>New</strong> Lynn): I begin tonight by thanking the<br />

parliamentary staff who have stayed with us right through the proceedings of the last<br />

week. I would like to recognise the messengers, our security staff, those who have<br />

looked after us, and those who have fed us. We have had a few long hours, because this<br />

is an issue we all care about. [Interruption] Members opposite may laugh.<br />

I will give a little geography lesson about Auckland. There is a road called Dominion<br />

Road—Crowded House wrote a song about it—and it runs pretty much right down the<br />

middle of the isthmus, south of Queen Street. To the east of that road, as the eye turns to<br />

the east—past the bronze statue on Manukau Road of Rodney Hide on his charger—<br />

and out to the valleys and dales of Remuera and Glendowie, where Don Brash used to<br />

live, it votes blue. It votes blue out in those hills. That is where the old money lives, but<br />

I say to Gerry Brownlee that he would not know about that. We turn our eyes to the<br />

west, and that is where the real people live. They vote Labour, more often than not.<br />

Those people are pretty damn angry at the moment.<br />

This bill is not about us—it is not about members in this House. It is not about the<br />

tag wrestle, it is not about the pet names—[Interruption]—and it is not about the<br />

members who have come back to the House tired and emotional, I say to Mr Quinn. It is<br />

about the thousands of Aucklanders who are watching tonight and wondering why this<br />

is happening. The people have in their gut a strong feeling that something has been<br />

taken away from them this week—some sense of history, some sense of identity, be it as<br />

residents of Waitakere, or of the proud North Shore, like its mayor, or of Manukau City.<br />

We might laugh and call each other names, but at the end of the day we know that the<br />

people will have the last say.<br />

It is true that the Government has stolen the cities of Auckland. It did not need to do<br />

it. We needed an integrated regional body, and the royal commission delivered it. But<br />

the royal commission did not ask us to steal the cities. It said we should preserve the<br />

cities but make them work leaner and better. The Government could have done that, but<br />

it chose not to. What it did say was that it would consult Aucklanders, but it did not.<br />

The Government did not consult Aucklanders on the royal commission, it did not<br />

consult them on the bill, and it has not been back to Auckland.<br />

The Government says that this bill is going to a select committee. That would make a<br />

change! I wonder whether the Government will give the submissioners more time than<br />

they gave the submissioners on the changes to the Resource Management Act. There is<br />

a lot of quiet anger out in <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> about that process, too.<br />

The Government has stacked the deck to keep its mates in power. That is the part I<br />

cannot get over. There are eight at-large councillors. If people do not have quarter of a<br />

million dollars for a mail drop, they should not apply. It is only for the rich and famous.<br />

Nineteen out of 20 councillors, historically, have been white men from Remuera with a<br />

lot of money to spend. That will go down in west Auckland like the proverbial bucket of<br />

sick, because westies will not stand for it. Sam Lotu-Iiga, and I am using his proper<br />

name, thinks it is funny for now, but there is a little clause in the other bill that<br />

guarantees he can have a quiet retirement from Auckland City without calling a byelection.<br />

That is an outrage—while we are on the subject.<br />

There will be eight at-large councillors, and by my reckoning that means Waitakere<br />

City will get two. So 200,000 people will be represented by two councillors. That area<br />

is twice the size of a general electorate in a general election. That is not democracy as<br />

Aucklanders know it, it is not democracy as they care about it, and it is not democracy<br />

as they will vote to exercise it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!