02.12.2012 Views

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) - New Zealand Parliament

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3720 Local Government (Tamaki Makaurau Reorganisation) Bill 16 May 2009<br />

sleepiness into the heart of this very key part of our legislature. I want it noted that we<br />

appreciate the services of those in the Clerk’s Office.<br />

It is necessary for us to rehearse ever so briefly why we have taken umbrage with the<br />

style and agenda shown by the Prime Minister and Mr Hide. This is what the jurist, the<br />

Hon Peter Salmon and his assistants, came back with—it deserves more than 1 day of<br />

sitting time of this House. We did not actually imagine that weeks and months would be<br />

tied up as the House debated and sent the bill to a select committee, because the royal<br />

commission settled upon a model that a huge number of parliamentarians saw some<br />

merit in. We took a great deal of exception to the undemocratic, unconstitutional,<br />

reckless, and dangerous style with which the rights of Aucklanders, families, workers,<br />

and community members have been trampled on, as a consequence of there being no<br />

opportunity for the public to comment on this reorganisation bill.<br />

The bill posits inordinate power with a small, shadowy group of people. We have no<br />

idea what they will cost us, broadly imagining that the ratepayers of Auckland will be<br />

left with the bill. They are a small group of people whom we fear will rack up inordinate<br />

expenses and then provide an opportunity for others not far away from them to use that<br />

as a chance to drive ahead with a privatisation agenda. We have been concerned that,<br />

and we have recited reasons why, this reorganisation bill will actually weaken the<br />

ability of Auckland to achieve mega-city status.<br />

There have been ill-informed remarks from members on the other side of the House,<br />

because, I understand, they believe that entertainment opportunities have been<br />

squandered as a consequence of the Pasifika, Māori, and Asians—who deserved an<br />

opportunity to come forward and simply tell their story. So it fell to Labour to ensure<br />

that the cloak of democracy sits easily on this House—not ruffled, wrapped up, and<br />

thrown aside like unwanted chip paper; that is not for us. That is why we have taken the<br />

time to try to explore every opportunity to ensure that the ratepayers of Auckland<br />

remember that it was the National Government that showed arrogant, uncaring, profitdriven,<br />

narrow, and divisive zealotry. That was what we sought to show the entirety of<br />

Auckland.<br />

I must continue on this rather baneful subject of the costs. The royal commission did<br />

not come up with exclusive costings. Rodney Hide stood in this House and said he did<br />

not know how much it will cost. John Key is not interested in how much it will cost.<br />

Bill English is already busily working out how he can claw it back after Treasury has<br />

had to fund it. It will fall on a whole bunch of people in Auckland who can hardly cope<br />

with the cost structure they are living with at the moment.<br />

There is a small reliance on the Māori language, as this bill gets to its fateful, fitful<br />

end. You know, the name Tāmaki-makau-rau is emblematic of what we have been<br />

through here. “Tāmaki” means either “ancestor” or “object of desire”; “makau” means<br />

“sweetheart”, and it also means “low tide”. This is definitely where the tide has begun<br />

to ebb for this uncaring, reckless, agenda-driven, and ideologically driven Government.<br />

The people of Auckland can see when the tide starts to go out, and it is definitely going<br />

out in particular on those Auckland MPs in the Government. Let them go out and<br />

explain to the Auckland communities why, from now on, every council decision will<br />

have to be reinforced or mandated by a small shadowy cabal of tsars. That is very, very<br />

dangerous. Let those MPs go out and tell them.<br />

Let them tell them in Onehunga. Of course, “hunga” means “people”, and “one”<br />

means “soil”. That is where the people who supported this madness of the National<br />

Government will be buried. Māngere in South Auckland—well it is unfortunate that<br />

those members’ colleague, who could not be here, has decided that the entirety of South<br />

Auckland should be written off with a glib remark about criminality. Of course we<br />

know that in Māngere they will remember that, because “māngere” means “lazy”,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!