Minutes June 25, 2007(Costa Mesa Sanitary District) for re-election <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Special Districts Association(CSDA) Board <strong>of</strong> Direc<strong>to</strong>rs, representing Region 6, Seat B, by <strong>the</strong> following roll call vote:AYES:NOES: NoneABSENT:ABSTAIN:Direc<strong>to</strong>rs Bakall, Clark, Dick, Finnegan, <strong>Hinman</strong> & RoyceDirec<strong>to</strong>r BarbreNoneThe Board <strong>the</strong>n directed staff <strong>to</strong> submit said Resolution <strong>to</strong> CSDA by <strong>the</strong> July <strong>30</strong> deadline.ESTABLISHMENT OF LEGISLATIVE POSITIONS<strong>President</strong> <strong>Hinman</strong> advised that <strong>the</strong> Public Affairs & Legislation Committee recommended an“oppose unless <strong>am</strong>ended” position on AB 70 (Jones re flood liability).Direc<strong>to</strong>r Bakall commented that although <strong>the</strong> bill is not perfect and he would prefer some<strong>am</strong>endments <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> bill, it is a step in <strong>the</strong> right direction, and he would recommend a“support if <strong>am</strong>ended” position. Direc<strong>to</strong>r Royce concurred, noting that he supports <strong>the</strong>concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation, but many <strong>of</strong> its terms are weak.Upon MOTION by Direc<strong>to</strong>r Royce, seconded by Direc<strong>to</strong>r Clark, and carried (6-0), <strong>the</strong> Boardadopted a “support if <strong>am</strong>ended” position on AB 70 (Jones re Flood Liability).CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT FOR ACWA’S “THE TIME IS NOW” ACTIONPLAN FOR A COMPREHENSIVE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGEGeneral Manager Hunt expressed enthusiasm for ACWA’s effort as it leads <strong>to</strong> a possibleDelta fix.Direc<strong>to</strong>r Bakall supported <strong>the</strong> effort and concept, but expressed some concern relative <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> proposed funding ($4.5 billion for additional water s<strong>to</strong>rage, $1billion for Deltasustainability, and $450 million for conservation and res<strong>to</strong>ration project), noting it may notbe enough, and may not be correctly apportioned. Direc<strong>to</strong>rs Clark, Finnegan, <strong>Hinman</strong>, andRoyce concurred, with Mr. Royce noting that he was anticipating <strong>the</strong> figures would beflexible and he hoped that more funding would be allocated <strong>to</strong> conveyance.Mr. Hunt responded by noting that this was ACWA’s first step in its outreach progr<strong>am</strong> andthat <strong>the</strong> figures are flexible and would be worked out during <strong>the</strong> process.Direc<strong>to</strong>r Clark inquired as <strong>to</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> “beneficiary pays” concept was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effort,with Mr. Hunt responding that a report on this concept would be made <strong>to</strong> an upcomingPublic Affairs & Legislation Committee.Mr. Peer Swan (Irvine Ranch Water District) commented that <strong>the</strong> initial State Water Projectinitiative authorized selling revenue bonds <strong>to</strong> pay for facilities, including any type <strong>of</strong> Deltaconveyance (and as such are already authorized and under <strong>the</strong> “user pays” concept). Henoted however, that s<strong>to</strong>rage has not been authorized. He believed it would be prudent <strong>to</strong>authorize s<strong>to</strong>rage prior <strong>to</strong> fixing <strong>the</strong> Delta due <strong>to</strong> timing issues (<strong>the</strong> Delta would takeapproximately 10-15 years <strong>to</strong> complete and s<strong>to</strong>rage could be completed faster than this).4
Minutes June 25, 2007Upon MOTION by Direc<strong>to</strong>r Royce, seconded by Direc<strong>to</strong>r Bakall, and carried (6-0), <strong>the</strong>Board adopted RESOLUTION NO. 1807, supporting a comprehensive water package thatincludes water s<strong>to</strong>rage, a comprehensive Delta solution and water use efficiency; andurging <strong>the</strong> Legislature <strong>to</strong> work with <strong>the</strong> Governor’s administration <strong>to</strong> pass <strong>the</strong> package thisyear and place it before <strong>the</strong> voters in 2008, by <strong>the</strong> following roll call vote:AYES:NOES: NoneABSENT:ABSTAIN:Direc<strong>to</strong>rs Bakall, Clark, Dick, Finnegan, <strong>Hinman</strong> & RoyceDirec<strong>to</strong>r BarbreNoneDirec<strong>to</strong>r Finnegan requested that staff compile <strong>the</strong> Board’s concerns and submit <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong>ACWA when sending <strong>the</strong> Resolution; <strong>the</strong> Board concurred.Direc<strong>to</strong>r Bakall requested staff research Mr. Swan’s comments and report any findings <strong>to</strong>an upcoming Public Affairs & Legislation Committee meeting.INFORMATION CALENDARGENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT, JUNE 2007General Manager Hunt advised that <strong>the</strong> General Manager’s report was included in <strong>the</strong>Board packet.Direc<strong>to</strong>r <strong>Hinman</strong> inquired as <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> MET’s lawsuit regarding <strong>the</strong> pumping on <strong>the</strong>State Water Project’s Banks’ pumping plant. Mr. Hunt noted that he received a letteroutlining <strong>the</strong> recent developments and he would distribute said letter <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Board.Ms. <strong>Hinman</strong> <strong>the</strong>n referenced <strong>the</strong> SmarTimer Rebate Progr<strong>am</strong>, and requested staff addressMr. Dietmeier’s comments; it was noted that staff would contact Mr. Dietmeier and provideinformation.The Board received and filed <strong>the</strong> report as presented.MWDOC GENERAL INFORMATION ITEMSBOARD OF DIRECTORSIn addition <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> regular MWDOC Board and Committee meetings attended by <strong>the</strong>Direc<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> following reports were made:Direc<strong>to</strong>r Dick reported on his attendance at <strong>the</strong> MET Board and Committee meetings, aswell as <strong>the</strong> Orange County prayer breakfast, MET’s Solar Cup event, <strong>the</strong> WACO meeting,and <strong>the</strong> legislative committee meetings <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> cities <strong>of</strong> Garden Grove and Orange. Healso reported on attending <strong>the</strong> Orange County Business Council meeting and <strong>the</strong> LAFCOhearing.5