- Page 1 and 2:
The Labour Relations BoardSaskatche
- Page 3 and 4:
3unionized workforce at their plant
- Page 5 and 6:
5[15] In addition, there was some h
- Page 7 and 8:
7Employee “D”: He was on his pr
- Page 9 and 10:
9[37] The Board did not have the be
- Page 11 and 12:
11[48] Shortly after Mr. Copeland b
- Page 13 and 14:
13credible reason for the disciplin
- Page 15 and 16:
15outlined by the Board in RWDSU v.
- Page 17 and 18:
173. Order for captive audience mee
- Page 19 and 20:
19for his failure to produce the wi
- Page 21 and 22:
21[95] Similarly as noted in the qu
- Page 23 and 24:
23[103] Also, in The Newspaper Guil
- Page 25 and 26:
25rights under the Act. The Employe
- Page 27 and 28:
27The determination of whether, in
- Page 29 and 30:
29respect to the section of the Alb
- Page 31 and 32:
31meetings, would have been within
- Page 33 and 34:
33[143] In respect of the complaint
- Page 35 and 36:
- 2 -[2] The plaintiff, Susan Chart
- Page 37 and 38:
- 4 -by the time she finished there
- Page 39 and 40:
- 6 -[24] Testimony was received fr
- Page 41 and 42:
- 8 -would feel grateful for the fo
- Page 43 and 44:
- 10 -[49] 2. Comfortable, even tem
- Page 45 and 46:
- 12 -[67] Another complaint was th
- Page 47 and 48:
- 14 -bottom of the problem and the
- Page 49 and 50:
- 16 -member about something amusin
- Page 51 and 52:
- 18 -[111] Given that the meeting
- Page 53 and 54:
- 20 -[130] Some of the plaintiff
- Page 55 and 56:
- 22 -[146] The plaintiff’s expla
- Page 57 and 58:
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIOBETWEENC
- Page 59 and 60:
Page: 3[5] In his application, the
- Page 61 and 62:
Page: 5(c) By the Employer at any t
- Page 63 and 64:
Page: 7continuation, in the amount
- Page 65 and 66:
Page: 9D. ANALYSIS[23] It is well-s
- Page 67 and 68:
Page: 11[28] The appellant submits
- Page 70 and 71:
Page: 14[37] When parties contract
- Page 72 and 73:
Page: 16addressing the issue of a c
- Page 74 and 75:
Page: 18application of mitigation:
- Page 76 and 77:
Page: 202008 ONCA 479, 91 O.R. (3d)
- Page 78 and 79: Page: 22[56] Notably, the concern e
- Page 80 and 81: Page: 24termination without cause,
- Page 82 and 83: Page: 26[64] The costs on the appli
- Page 84 and 85: The parties agree this Board has th
- Page 86 and 87: Mr. Wallace. The evidence is that M
- Page 88 and 89: Mr. Mutter and Mr. Wallace each tes
- Page 90 and 91: Mutter spoke. He testified he was a
- Page 92 and 93: saw (or was told by the crew) Mr. K
- Page 94 and 95: and heard, as well as other factors
- Page 96 and 97: When viewed in that light, it is fa
- Page 98 and 99: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COL
- Page 100 and 101: Balogun v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP P
- Page 102 and 103: Balogun v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP P
- Page 104 and 105: Balogun v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP P
- Page 106 and 107: Balogun v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP P
- Page 108 and 109: Balogun v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP P
- Page 111 and 112: Balogun v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP P
- Page 113 and 114: Page 2of the immediate problem that
- Page 115 and 116: Page 4- He admitted that he had pla
- Page 117 and 118: Page 626 26. The Grievor's conduct
- Page 119 and 120: Page 8he had a problem with was fro
- Page 121 and 122: Page 10supervisor. Counsel argued t
- Page 123 and 124: Page 12hope to gain a financial ben
- Page 125 and 126: Page 1483 83. McKinley is an import
- Page 127: Page 16(iv)Has the employer attempt
- Page 131 and 132: [1] This is an Application under se
- Page 133 and 134: [10] Sean McKay also testified on b
- Page 135 and 136: THE LAW[19] Section 5 of the Code p
- Page 137 and 138: that ensued. There is no evidence t
- Page 139 and 140: HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO___
- Page 141 and 142: [1] The applicant has filed two App
- Page 143 and 144: CHRONOLOGY OF KEY EVENTS[11] The ap
- Page 145 and 146: tasks beyond his functional limits
- Page 147 and 148: do what they can and that if someon
- Page 149 and 150: checking summaries before stating t
- Page 151 and 152: Roehl in June or to the respondent
- Page 153 and 154: Section 10 of the Code defines hara
- Page 155 and 156: was assigned duties that required h
- Page 157 and 158: -last portion of the day he levels
- Page 159 and 160: [66] I recognize that some of the c
- Page 161 and 162: was made aware on May 22/07 that hi
- Page 163 and 164: “To be honest Tony I don’t know
- Page 165 and 166: is older, or believed that the appl
- Page 167 and 168: [91] The applicant also submitted t
- Page 169 and 170: steps to address allegations of dis
- Page 171 and 172: this period lessening, in my view,
- Page 173 and 174: [109] The respondent submits that i
- Page 175 and 176: that the events of May 22 may have
- Page 177: Accordingly, I am requiring the par