RFP for BHOPAL & Narmadapuram Division - Madhya Pradesh ...
RFP for BHOPAL & Narmadapuram Division - Madhya Pradesh ... RFP for BHOPAL & Narmadapuram Division - Madhya Pradesh ...
MPRDC DPR - ADB -IVName of Firm:Positiona. Sr. Highway Engineer CumTeam Leaderb. Highway Engineerc Pavement Specialistd Bridge EngineerE Traffic EngineerfMaterials cum GeoTechnical Engineerg Senior Survey Engineerh Transport EconomistJ Environment SpecialistKLResettlement andRehabilitation SpecialistSocial DevelopmentSpecialistPERSONNEL EVALUATION SHEET FOR FULL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (QCBS)NAMEA B C DGeneral Qualifications Project-Related Overseas Full-TimeExperience Experience Permanent Staff20% 60% 15%(10% TL) 5%(10% TL)Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating ScoreM Quantity Surveyor /Documentation ExpertRating: Excellent - 100% Very Good - 90% Good - 80% Average - 75% Non-complying - 0%Notes: *Applicable to both lead and associate firms.CONFIDENTIALTOTALSCORE(A+B+C+D)ADB-IV21
NARRATIVE EVALUATION CRITERIAFOR FULL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (FTP)Annexure - 1I. QUALIFICATION OF PROPOSER (250 Points)A. Experience in Preparation of Detailed Project Reports (200 points)Criteria: Firm should have successfully prepared Detailed Project Report during last 5years for at least aggregate length of 600 KM of 2 laning/intermediate lane orequivalent highway project (SH/NH/Expressway etc.) for 75% of points. No weightagewill be given for experience of preparing feasibility report.Factors to consider: Each reference project included in the technical proposal withsingle assignment of minimum 100 KM length (One Unit) of 2 laning orintermediate lane/equivalent highway project (MDR/SH/NH/Expressway etc.) willonly be judged for calculating the aggregate length. Higher scores will be given to afirm, which has more experiences for projects with relevant nature.RatingExcellent 100% more than 10 unitVery Good 90% 10 UnitGood 80% 8 UnitAverage 75% 6 UnitNot complying 0%The satisfactory completion certificate issued by the Principal Employer should beattached in support of the experience.B. Experience in Similar Geographical Areas (50 points)Criteria: Extent of experience in India or similar geographical region like, Nepal,Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Myanmar, etc. with the criteriamentioned in Para "A" above will only be considered.II. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (50 Points)A. Understanding of Objectives (5 points)Criteria: General understanding of the project requirements; coverage of principalcomponents as requested in TOR; and site visit assessment.Factors to consider: The three following aspects will be considered:ADB-IV22
- Page 1 and 2: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVINVITATION FOR CO
- Page 3 and 4: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVMadhya Pradesh Ro
- Page 5 and 6: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVMADHYA PRADESH RO
- Page 7 and 8: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVSection 3 - Techn
- Page 9 and 10: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVConsultant should
- Page 11 and 12: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVParticipation of
- Page 13 and 14: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVType ofProposalCo
- Page 15 and 16: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IV(b)(c)(d)(e)is pr
- Page 17 and 18: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVspecified in the
- Page 19 and 20: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVSection - 3DATA S
- Page 21: MPRDCDPR - ADB -IVRATINGExcellent 1
- Page 25 and 26: F. Counterpart Personnel and Facili
- Page 27 and 28: 2.3 The Detailed Project Report wou
- Page 29 and 30: 3.12 Deleted.3.13 In order to have
- Page 31 and 32: 4.3 The consultant shall plan the a
- Page 33 and 34: 4.7 Traffic Survey4.7.1 Number and
- Page 35 and 36: 4.7.3.5 The distribution of lead an
- Page 37 and 38: pessimistic and most likely traffic
- Page 39 and 40: upgrading costs. The detailed topog
- Page 41 and 42: 4.9.2.7 Details of utility Services
- Page 43 and 44: (ii)(iii)(iv)shoulder condition;emb
- Page 45 and 46: section testing shall involve carry
- Page 47 and 48: 4.9.4.2.3 For bridges and cross dra
- Page 49 and 50: 4.9.4.5.3 Environmental restriction
- Page 51 and 52: (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)horizontal align
- Page 53 and 54: Government guidelines, use of flyas
- Page 55 and 56: 4.9.6.9 Arboriculture and Landscapi
- Page 57 and 58: 4.10.1.10 The consultant shall prep
- Page 59 and 60: feasibility and effectiveness of in
- Page 61 and 62: (ii)(iii)(iv)(v)Civil works contrac
- Page 63 and 64: 4.12 Economic Analysis4.12.1 The ro
- Page 65 and 66: 7. Project Team and Project Office
- Page 67 and 68: e presented as separate sections li
- Page 69 and 70: estimation, environmental aspects,
- Page 71 and 72: (ii)(iii)(iv)(v)Locations of median
NARRATIVE EVALUATION CRITERIAFOR FULL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (FTP)Annexure - 1I. QUALIFICATION OF PROPOSER (250 Points)A. Experience in Preparation of Detailed Project Reports (200 points)Criteria: Firm should have successfully prepared Detailed Project Report during last 5years <strong>for</strong> at least aggregate length of 600 KM of 2 laning/intermediate lane orequivalent highway project (SH/NH/Expressway etc.) <strong>for</strong> 75% of points. No weightagewill be given <strong>for</strong> experience of preparing feasibility report.Factors to consider: Each reference project included in the technical proposal withsingle assignment of minimum 100 KM length (One Unit) of 2 laning orintermediate lane/equivalent highway project (MDR/SH/NH/Expressway etc.) willonly be judged <strong>for</strong> calculating the aggregate length. Higher scores will be given to afirm, which has more experiences <strong>for</strong> projects with relevant nature.RatingExcellent 100% more than 10 unitVery Good 90% 10 UnitGood 80% 8 UnitAverage 75% 6 UnitNot complying 0%The satisfactory completion certificate issued by the Principal Employer should beattached in support of the experience.B. Experience in Similar Geographical Areas (50 points)Criteria: Extent of experience in India or similar geographical region like, Nepal,Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Myanmar, etc. with the criteriamentioned in Para "A" above will only be considered.II. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY (50 Points)A. Understanding of Objectives (5 points)Criteria: General understanding of the project requirements; coverage of principalcomponents as requested in TOR; and site visit assessment.Factors to consider: The three following aspects will be considered:ADB-IV22
Change language