ACT Prac Test with prep notes

1 1The court remained unconvinced, therefore, thatwhen wearing jeans would actually impair the learning41process of Kevin or of his fellow classmates.Kevin Bannister’s case was significant in that itwas the first in the United States to address clothingprohibitions of a school dress code. His challengeinitiated a review, of students’ rights and administrativeresponsibility in public education.44424342424040. F. NO CHANGEG. thus,H. moreover,J. however,41. A. NO CHANGEB. by wearingC. wearingD. having worn42. Which choice would most effectively open this paragraphand convey the importance of this case?F. NO CHANGEG. Therefore, Kevin’s case reminds us that youshould stand up for your rights, no matter how oldyou are.H. The case for personal liberty means the right tospeak up must be taken seriously by the courts.J. All in all, clothing is an important part of our identity.43. A. NO CHANGEB. review, of students’ rights,C. review of students’ rightsD. review of students’ rights,44. F. NO CHANGEG. onH. withJ. aboutQuestion 45 asks about the preceding passageas a whole.45. Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write a brief persuasiveessay urging students to exercise their constitutionalrights. Would this essay fulfill that goal?A. Yes, because the essay focuses on how Kevinencouraged other students to exercise their constitutionalrights.B. Yes, because the essay focuses on various types ofclothing historically worn by students as a freedomof expression.C. No, because the essay suggests that the right towear blue jeans was not a substantial constitutionalright in the 1970s.D. No, because the essay objectively reports on onecase of a student exercising a particular constitutionalright.ACT-61C-PRACTICE20GO ON TO THE NEXT PAGE.