12.07.2015 Views

NEW HAMPSHIRE - Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

NEW HAMPSHIRE - Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

NEW HAMPSHIRE - Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>HAMPSHIRE</strong>BACKGROUNDContact: Carol Henderson, Environmental Review Coordinator, NH <strong>Fish</strong> & Game,carol.henderson@wildlife.nh.gov, 11 Hazen Drive, Concord NH 03301Installed Utility Scale Wind Power: 1 MW (what does this refer to?)INCENTIVES FOR WIND DEVELOPMENTRenewable Portfolio St<strong>and</strong>ard: Yes - 23.8% by 2025Incentives for Industrial or “Big Wind” Production:The New Hampshire Business Resource Center <strong>and</strong> Ocean National sponsor the Renewable Energy<strong>and</strong> Energy Efficiency Business Loan Program that <strong>of</strong>fers small businesses a reduced interest rateloan <strong>of</strong> at least $10,000 for the purchase <strong>of</strong> renewable energy systems <strong>and</strong> energy efficiencyimprovements.Incentives for Residential <strong>and</strong> “Small Wind” Production:New Hampshire allows each city <strong>and</strong> town to <strong>of</strong>fer an exemption on residential property taxes in theamount <strong>of</strong> the assessed value <strong>of</strong> a renewable-energy system used on the property.Interconnection <strong>and</strong> Net Metering St<strong>and</strong>ards:Net metering is available to all electric-generating systems powered by “renewable” energy with amaximum system capacity <strong>of</strong> 100 kW <strong>and</strong> the aggregate capacity <strong>of</strong> net-metered systems in autility’s service territory is 1.0% <strong>of</strong> the utility’s annual peak energy dem<strong>and</strong>.ENERGY SITING PROCESSPower Siting Authority: New Hampshire Energy Facility Siting Evaluation Committee (SEC)provides a Certificate for Site <strong>and</strong> Facility for energy facilities over 30 MW; developers <strong>of</strong> facilitiesless than 30 MW can opt-in to the SEC process to preempt local jurisdiction or to access theaggressive schedule (within 9 months from application) that the SEC is required to pursue. If notgoing through the SEC process, wind development would fall under local jurisdiction. The state iscurrently going through their third wind power siting evaluation.Wind Specific Siting Authority? NoCode or Regulations: RSA 162-HRole <strong>of</strong> State <strong>Fish</strong> & <strong>Wildlife</strong> Agency: The Executive Director <strong>of</strong> the New Hampshire <strong>Fish</strong> &Game Department (NHFG) is one <strong>of</strong> 15 <strong>of</strong>ficials from 8 state agencies that sit on the SitingEvaluation Committee. NH <strong>Fish</strong> & Game Department has review <strong>of</strong> the project for impacts to


wildlife especially threatened & endangered species. Department <strong>of</strong> Environmental Services isresponsible for wetl<strong>and</strong>s, alteration <strong>of</strong> terrain, water quality certificate, etc.How are wildlife laws applied: The siting application includes an evaluation <strong>of</strong> potential impactson the environment <strong>and</strong> plans to study <strong>and</strong> resolving environmental problems. This is the actual lawfor review <strong>of</strong> environmental issues in (c) below.162-H:16 Findings <strong>and</strong> Certificate Issuance. –I. The committee shall incorporate in any certificate such terms <strong>and</strong> conditions as may bespecified to the committee by any <strong>of</strong> the other state agencies having jurisdiction, under state orfederal law, to regulate any aspect <strong>of</strong> the construction or operation <strong>of</strong> the proposed facility;provided, however, the committee shall not issue any certificate under this chapter if any <strong>of</strong> theother state agencies denies authorization for the proposed activity over which it has jurisdiction. Thedenial <strong>of</strong> any such authorization shall be based on the record <strong>and</strong> explained in reasonable detail bythe denying agency.II. Any certificate issued by the site evaluation committee shall be based on the record. Thedecision to issue a certificate in its final form or to deny an application once it has been acceptedshall be made by a majority <strong>of</strong> the full membership. A certificate shall be conclusive on allquestions <strong>of</strong> siting, l<strong>and</strong> use, air <strong>and</strong> water quality.III. The committee may consult with interested regional agencies <strong>and</strong> agencies <strong>of</strong> border states inthe consideration <strong>of</strong> certificates.IV. The site evaluation committee, after having considered available alternatives <strong>and</strong> fullyreviewed the environmental impact <strong>of</strong> the site or route, <strong>and</strong> other relevant factors bearing onwhether the objectives <strong>of</strong> this chapter would be best served by the issuance <strong>of</strong> the certificate, mustfind that the site <strong>and</strong> facility:(a) Applicant has adequate financial, technical, <strong>and</strong> managerial capability to assure construction<strong>and</strong> operation <strong>of</strong> the facility in continuing compliance with the terms <strong>and</strong> conditions <strong>of</strong> thecertificate.(b) Will not unduly interfere with the orderly development <strong>of</strong> the region with due considerationhaving been given to the views <strong>of</strong> municipal <strong>and</strong> regional planning commissions <strong>and</strong> municipalgoverning bodies.(c) Will not have an unreasonable adverse effect on aesthetics, historic sites, air <strong>and</strong> waterquality, the natural environment, <strong>and</strong> public health <strong>and</strong> safety.(d) [Repealed.]V. [Repealed.]VI. A certificate <strong>of</strong> site <strong>and</strong> facility may contain such reasonable terms <strong>and</strong> conditions as thecommittee deems necessary <strong>and</strong> may provide for such reasonable monitoring procedures as may benecessary. Such certificates, when issued, shall be final <strong>and</strong> subject only to judicial review.VII. The committee may condition the certificate upon the results <strong>of</strong> required federal <strong>and</strong> stateagency studies whose study period exceeds the application period.Source. 1991, 295:1, eff. Jan. 1, 1992. 2009, 65:18-21, 24, IX, eff. Aug. 8, 2009.WILDLIFE GUIDELINES FOR WIND<strong>Wildlife</strong> Guidelines for Wind Power Siting: Proposed guidance, using Vermont’s guidance as abasis.


Lead Agency on Guidelines: A stakeholders group led by NH Audubon <strong>and</strong> AppalachianMountain Club (AMC) with representatives from NHFG, USFWS, non-pr<strong>of</strong>its (Audubon, AMC,TNC) <strong>and</strong> wind representatives is drafting the guidelines. This has not been pursued further.Status <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Guidelines: Preliminary draft submitted by Wind Energy Facility SitingGuidelines Working Group on May 29 2007 to NH Energy Policy Committee Wind SitingSubcommittee for review.Summary <strong>of</strong> Guidelines: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> whether project is likely or less likely to have majorimpacts. Projects are placed into categories. For wildlife, pre- <strong>and</strong> post-monitoring studies areoutlined.Detailed Summary <strong>of</strong> New Hampshire’s Draft VoluntaryGuidelinesPre-constructionsurveyDesign/OperationRecommendationsSite DevelopmentRecommendationsConsultation withwildlife agency,USFWSMitigationrequirementsProposed guidelines recommend preliminary consultation with a proposedstate coordinator to evaluate initial data collection needs. After initial datacompilation, the developer should do a pre-application consultation with aproposed wind power advisory group to make a preliminary assessment onthe proposal’s suitability <strong>and</strong> concerns for resources, <strong>and</strong> to then providerecommendations for more complete studies necessary for the project. Theproposed guidelines then include a detailed overview <strong>of</strong> resource <strong>and</strong> socialissues that should be considered including rare plants, natural communities,soils <strong>and</strong> topography, water <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong>s, wildlife, existing l<strong>and</strong> use <strong>and</strong>infrastructure, recreational use, etc. For wildlife, required pre-permittingsurveys should include radar <strong>and</strong> acoustical surveys <strong>of</strong> birds <strong>and</strong> bats for atleast one year; visual surveys for diurnal migrating birds <strong>and</strong> bats for aminimum <strong>of</strong> one spring <strong>and</strong> one fall season; breeding bird surveys for aminimum <strong>of</strong> one breeding season. Recommended surveys for wildlife (onlyif deemed necessary from initial data compilation) should include surveysfor rare, threatened or endangered species, identification <strong>of</strong> suitable habitatfor lynx <strong>and</strong> marten, surveys for small footed bat, March to August surveys<strong>of</strong> peregrine falcons <strong>and</strong> mapping <strong>of</strong> beech, oak <strong>and</strong> mountain ashoccurrence.NoneNoneNoneNone


Post-Construction/Operational Surveys NoneDecommissioningNone

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!