TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR COMPETITIVENESSVOLUME 1Giv<strong>en</strong> the above, in an initial stage, the policies thatseek to foster R+D in a g<strong>en</strong>eralized manner, normallyassociated to g<strong>en</strong>eric innovations, should be targeted atfostering both the demand and the supply of R+D in firms.These Horizontal Technology Policies (HTP) arecharacterized by fostering socially desirable activities in awide range of industrial sectorsess<strong>en</strong>tial, since this allows for redesigns to attain betterresults over time and face new objectives and new needsthat arise on the road. There is much international evid<strong>en</strong>ceon the difficulties in carrying out changes of this nature.91
TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR COMPETITIVENESSVOLUME 1ACTION RECOMENDATIONSAchieving success in the task of adding knowledge to production requires a systemic viewpoint and a new partnership combining private<strong>en</strong>trepr<strong>en</strong>eurial initiative with a public sector participation targeted at, on the one hand, <strong>en</strong>suring the provision of public goods that support innovation;in other words, human capital (through education and training), the networks of physical and technological infrastructure and sci<strong>en</strong>tific research and, onthe other hand, the inc<strong>en</strong>tives framework and the rules of the game that favour technological developm<strong>en</strong>t and the emerg<strong>en</strong>ce of greater productiondiversity.The action of the State should be strictly restricted to a subsidiary role, correcting the market and system failures that affect the innovationprocess: the problems of appropriability, failures of information, intangibility of assets and network failures. With the above criteria fulfilled, theprovision of public resources for innovation should always seek to leverage greater <strong>en</strong>deavours from the private sector.The design of public policies has to take into account that all the market failures described do not occur in a static but rather in a dynamic manner.This not only requires flexible and revisable instrum<strong>en</strong>ts, it also requires strategic decisions wh<strong>en</strong> facing the future chall<strong>en</strong>ges of the country.The action of the State must also maintain an adequate balance combining the str<strong>en</strong>gths from neutral public policies with the need to incorporateselectivity criteria, which must not emerge from an arbitrary analysis nor one contaminated by interest group pressure, both for the pot<strong>en</strong>tialities of th<strong>en</strong>ational economy and the obstacles or lags that the country faces in developing them.The country requires a human capital formation system that integrates the education of technicians and professionals and employm<strong>en</strong>t training,which is flexible, based on compet<strong>en</strong>cies, and capable of g<strong>en</strong>erating, diffusing and appropriating innovation, especially in sectors with competitivepot<strong>en</strong>tial.For this, it is determinant that the population has more people with third level education, with education focused on <strong>en</strong>suring the quality of ourprofessionals as g<strong>en</strong>erators, diffusers and users of innovation.Since education is an intangible asset and the results are uncertain, the role of public funding for third level education is crucial. The social b<strong>en</strong>efitof having a more educated population and the funding problems characteristic of education, op<strong>en</strong> the door to the action of the State in order toguarantee access to the system to those who, while having the abilities, are excluded from third level education due to a lack of resources. Today, thatpublic support only covers (and only partially giv<strong>en</strong> the other costs that must be covered by stud<strong>en</strong>ts) the three poorest quintiles of the population.Furthermore, the ratio today betwe<strong>en</strong> professionals and technicians in Chile is totally differ<strong>en</strong>t to that found in developed countries (11 to 1), dueto an undervaluation of the returns of technical education (asymmetry of information) and the fact that public funding for technical third level educationhas only be<strong>en</strong> incorporated rec<strong>en</strong>tly.92