Libro Blanco Vol I en Ingles

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR COMPETITIVENESSVOLUME 1FIGURE 1The importance of maintaining growthFIGURE 2Competitiveness of ChileFIGURE 3Years of schooling in Chile100 150 200 250 3000 500 1000 1500PIB per cápita(Base: PIB per cápita año 1986=100)1985 1990 1995 2000 2005A ñosPaísesC orea Chile MalasiaPIB per cápita(Base: PIB per cápita año 1966=100)1970 1980 1990 2000 2010AñosPaísesC orea M alasia ChileIn the last 20 years, Chile has grown at a pace similar to the mostsuccessful Asian countries: Malaysia, the best of the Tigers, andSouth Korea, the most dynamic of the Dragons (figure above).However, in the last 40 years, Malaysia has succeeded inincreasing its GDP five-fold and South Korea over twelve times;meanwhile Chile has not even managed to triple it.Ranking de Chile en los nueve factores que componenel Indice de Competitividad Global del WEFMacroeconomíaEficiencia de los MercadosInstitucionesSofisticación de NegociosInfraestructuraPreparación TecnológicaInnovaciónEd. Superior y CapacitaciónSalud y Educación Primaria724253035353940570 20 40 60Posición en el rankingChile ranks 27 out of the 125 countries listed in the GlobalCompetitiveness ranking of the World Economic Forum. However,in each of the nine determinant pillars of competitiveness, Chile haswidely varying performances: the high-points include macroeconomy,efficiency of markets and the quality of institutions. Theweakest points are health and primary and higher education, andtraining and innovation.Source: Studies Unit, Executive Secretariat, Innovation Council.Based on the Global Competitiveness Index 2006-2007 of theWorld Economic Forum.Años promedio de escolaridad(sobre población de 15 años y más)0 5 10 15Años promedio de escolaridad y PIB per cápita199019801960 197020000 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000PIB per cápita PPCPaíses de rápido crecimiento y ricos en recursos naturalesChina Corea India MalasiaTailandia Suecia Dinamarca AustraliaN. Zelandia Noruega Canadá ChileTendencia promedioIn the year 2000, the over-15 population had an average of 10 years ofschooling, one year less than the country should have had considering itsincome level, given the trends of high-growth economies. Even though inrecent years Chile has improved its average rate, estimates by Cohen andSoto (2000) indicate that schooling will reach 10.77 in 2010, while thecurve for high-growth economies indicates that Chile should reach anaverage of 12 years. This serves to warn us that the lag may beincreasing.Source: Studies Unit, Executive Secretariat, Innovation Council. Based onthe: “The World Economy: Historical Statistics”, A. Maddison, 2001; andCohen and Soto (2000), “Growth & Human Capital: Good data, goodresults”. Discussion papers Nº 3025, CEPR.Source: Studies Unit, Secretariat of Innovation Council. Based on“The World Economy: Historical Statistics”, A. Maddison (2001) andestimates of the Economist Intelligence Unit.45
TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR COMPETITIVENESSVOLUME 1FIGURE 4Third level EducationFIGURE 5Third level EducationFIGURE 6PISA en Comprensión Lectora y PIB per cápita% de matrícula0 20 40 60 80Matrícula en educación terciaria y PIB per cápita9101239199 0 1 2 3919999 00199 0 1 2 391212399 1020 5000 10000 15000913919199 091PIB per cápita PPCPaíses de rápido crecimientoChile China Corea EstoniaIndia Letonia Lituania MalasiaTailandiaTendenciapromedioThe figure shows that in Chile the percentage of students enrolled out ofthe total population of third level attendance age is below the levelcorresponding to its level of income.Source: Studies Unit, Executive Secretariat, Innovation Council. Basedon A. Maddison (2001),“The World Economy: Historical Statistics” and"World Development Indicators”, World Bank (2006). PPC refers toPurchasing Power Parity.992 30123990123Porcentaje0 20 40 60 80 100Porcentaje de matrícula en educación terciaria214339892665Chile Corea Estonia Irlanda Letonia Lituania29591991 2004The Baltic States, Ireland and South Korea (which have had highgrowth rates over the last 10 years) have taken a much greaterleap than Chile in third level enrolment, in some cases doublingthe level in Chile.Source: Studies Unit, Executive Secretariat, Innovation Council.Based on "World Development Indicators”, World Bank (2006).26763373Puntaje400 450 500 5502000200020032003200020002003200020032000 20032000 200320002000200320035000 10000 15000 20000 25000PIB per cápita PPCPaíses intensivos en recursos naturales y de rápido crecimientoAustralia Canada Chile CoreaDinamarca Finlandia Letonia Nueva ZelandaSuecia TailandiaTendenciapromedioThe basic competence levels shown by some Chileans in theinternational PISA tests is below what would be expected by theincome level of the country and the trend seen in high-growthcountries and those that are rich in natural resources.Source: Studies Unit, Executive Secretariat, Innovation Council.Based on A. Maddison (2001),“The World Economy: HistoricalStatistics”; “Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow. Further resultsfrom PISA 2000”, OECD, UNESCO-UIS (2003), and “Learning forTomorrow’s World. First results from PISA 2003”, OECD (2004).PPP refers to Purchasing Power Parity.2000200346
Page 6 and 7: TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRAT
Page 11: TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRAT
Page 95 and 96:
TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRAT
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
also mean an uncomfortable position
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159:
show all

Libro Blanco Vol I en Ingles

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?