12.07.2015 Views

Libro Blanco Vol I en Ingles

Libro Blanco Vol I en Ingles

Libro Blanco Vol I en Ingles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TOWARDS A NATIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR COMPETITIVENESSVOLUME 1Coverage and quality, in any case, are intimately related. Both, in turn, are related to the funding factor.Giv<strong>en</strong> that the school system has already reached over 99% coverage in primary education and 92% insecondary education 17 , the way to substantially improve schooling is to increase coverage of third leveleducation (technical, university and adult), an aspect in which the country, despite its rec<strong>en</strong>t advances, asindicated earlier, is not advancing suffici<strong>en</strong>tly quickly. Firstly, because there are young people, with th<strong>en</strong>ecessary skills, who cannot <strong>en</strong>ter higher education due to funding problems. Secondly, because to dramaticallyincrease third level <strong>en</strong>rolm<strong>en</strong>t the problems of quality that persist in our primary and secondary education mustbe tackled: increasing the number of young people <strong>en</strong>tering third level education will only be effective andeffici<strong>en</strong>t if they have the basic compet<strong>en</strong>ces to take full advantage of that opportunity, and in turn they willprovide the country with a real leap forward in productivity-<strong>en</strong>hancing human capital.This quality deficit has two lines of solution.The first dep<strong>en</strong>ds on a significant managem<strong>en</strong>t-level improvem<strong>en</strong>t that increases the effici<strong>en</strong>cy of the useof resources. This requires: i) an adequate level of governability for the system, through a correct organizationof the Governm<strong>en</strong>t, which is the mandator for most of the primary, secondary and third level educationinstitutions of the country ii) a clear relationship and the accountability of the educational ag<strong>en</strong>ts to theirmandator, both in the use of resources as well as in the results, and iii) a solution to the failures of informationthat, apart from the relationship of the mandator with the educational ag<strong>en</strong>t, allow for an effective control bythe users of the system (which are on occasion joint-mandators, wh<strong>en</strong> there is shared funding, or a singlemandator, as in the case of private non-subsidized education) 18 .The second corresponds to the need for greater resources. In fact, the OECD indicates that differ<strong>en</strong>ces inthe accumulated sp<strong>en</strong>ding per stud<strong>en</strong>t account for 54% of the variation in the average performance amongcountries in the PISA test. Let’s see how Chile fares comparatively concerning funding.17 According to the 2003 CASEN survey.18 All these aspects lie at the c<strong>en</strong>tre of the discussion in Chapter 3 and are applicable both to the problems of education and to othermarkets. Highlighting these three aspects does not imply ignoring, for example, that the cont<strong>en</strong>t provided by the educational systemneeds to be more pertin<strong>en</strong>t in its later stages to the reality of the world of work; or the urg<strong>en</strong>cy of improving teacher training systems.35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!