Changes in soil bacterial community profiles associated with ...
Changes in soil bacterial community profiles associated with ...
Changes in soil bacterial community profiles associated with ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
46 Ryoichi DOI, Pongsak SAHUNALU, Chongrak WACHRINRAT, Sakhan TEEJUNTUK and Katsutoshi SAKURAIPC2(13%)(a)3210-2 -1-10 1 2-2PC1(44%)PC2(11%)(d)3210-2 -1 0 1 2-1-2PC1(40%)PC2(19%)(b)3210-2 -1 0 1 2-1-2PC1(30%)PC2(12%)(e)3210-2 -1 0-11 2-2PC1(33%)PC2(11%)(c)3210-2 -1 0 1 2-1PC2(10%)(f)3210-2 -1 0-11 2-2PC1(43%)-2PC1(40%)Fig. 4. Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal component score plots for the methods and the AWCDs. The triangle and diamond<strong>in</strong>dicate DEF and BG, respectively. The solid and blank symbols <strong>in</strong>dicate replications 1 and 2,respectively. (See Fig. 1 for the locations.) The diagrams are based on: a, antibiotic resistanceMPN method; b, disk diffusion method; c, 0.2 AWCD (Biolog); d, 0.6 AWCD; e, 1.0 AWCD; f,1.4 AWCD.Table 2. Comparison of discrim<strong>in</strong>atory power of the tested profil<strong>in</strong>g methodsMethodAntibiotic resistance MPN (Method 1)Disk diffusion (Method 2)Biolog*Average well color developmentCondition Wilk’s lambda Significance0.2 AWCD*0.6 AWCD1.0 AWCD1.4 AWCD0.0010.0040.0010.0000.1100.0030.0860.1570.0780.0400.7080.134
Change language