My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org

My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org

wallace.online.org
from wallace.online.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

:242 MY LIFEme. It seems to me that before formulating the ideain a specific shape, it is needful to generate a bodyof public opinion on the general issue, and that itmust be some time before there can be producedsuch recognition of the general principle involved asis needful before definite plans can be set forth toany purpose." It seems to me that the thing to be done atpresent is to arouse public attention to (i) the abstractinequity of the present condition of things; (2) toshow that even now there is in our law a tacit denialof absolute private ownership, since the State reservesthe power of resuming possession of land on makingcompensation ; (3) that this tacitly admitted ownershipought to be overtly asserted ; (4) and that havingbeen overtly asserted, the landowner should be distinctlyplaced in the position of a tenant of the Stateon something like the terms proposed in your schemenamely, that while the land itself should be regardedas public property, such value as has been given toit should vest in the existing so-called owner." The question is surrounded with such difficultiesthat I fear anything like a specific scheme for resumptionby the State will tend, by the objections made,to prevent recognition of a general truth which mightotherwise be admitted. For example, in definitelymaking the proposed distinction between ' inherentvalue as dependent on natural conditions, etc.,' andthe 'increased value given by the owner,' there israised the questions—How are the two to be distinguished? How far back are we to go in takingaccount of the labour and money expended in givingfertility ? In respect of newly enclosed tracts, someestimation may be made ; but in respect of thegreater part, long reduced to cultivation, I do not

SPENCER, HUXLEY, AND OTHERS 243see how the valuations, differing in all cases, are tobe made.*'I name this as one point ; and there are manyothersin respect of which I do not see my way. Itappears to me that at present we are far off from thetime at which action may advantageously be taken." Truly yours," Herbert Spencer."The last three letters I received from HerbertSpencer were in 1894 and 1895, all on the subject ofwhat he termed "the absurdity of Lord Salisbury'srepresentation of the process of natural selection " inhis British Association address at Oxford, wishingme to write to the Times, pointing out his errors,which were influencing many persons and writers inthe press, and suggesting certain points I shouldespecially deal with. He concluded, " It behoves youof all men to take up the gauntlet he has thus throwndown." I replied, declining the task, on the groundthat I did not think Lord Salisbury's influence in amatter of science of much importance, and that Ithought my time better employed in writing sucharticles on social and political, as well as generalscientific questions which then interested me. Tothis he replied that he did not at all agree with me,and that "articles in the papers show that LordSalisbury's argument is received with triumph, andunless it is disposed of, it will lead to a public reactionagainst the doctrine of evolution at large."As I still declined to go into this controversy,having dealt with the whole matter in my " Darwinism,"and still being sceptical as to any greateffects being produced by the address in question, hewrote me a month later as follows :" As I cannot

:242 MY LIFEme. It seems to me that before formulating the ideain a specific shape, it is needful to generate a body<strong>of</strong> public opinion on the general issue, <strong>and</strong> that itmust be some time before there can be producedsuch recognition <strong>of</strong> the general principle involved asis needful before definite plans can be set forth toany purpose." It seems to me that the thing to be done atpresent is to arouse public attention to (i) the abstractinequity <strong>of</strong> the present condition <strong>of</strong> things; (2) toshow that even now there is in our law a tacit denial<strong>of</strong> absolute private ownership, since the State reservesthe power <strong>of</strong> resuming possession <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> on makingcompensation ; (3) that this tacitly admitted ownershipought to be overtly asserted ; (4) <strong>and</strong> that havingbeen overtly asserted, the l<strong>and</strong>owner should be distinctlyplaced in the position <strong>of</strong> a tenant <strong>of</strong> the Stateon something like the terms proposed in your schemenamely, that while the l<strong>and</strong> itself should be regardedas public property, such value as has been given toit should vest in the existing so-called owner." The question is surrounded with such difficultiesthat I fear anything like a specific scheme for resumptionby the State will tend, by the objections made,to prevent recognition <strong>of</strong> a general truth which mightotherwise be admitted. For example, in definitelymaking the proposed distinction between ' inherentvalue as dependent on natural conditions, etc.,' <strong>and</strong>the 'increased value given by the owner,' there israised the questions—How are the two to be distinguished? How far back are we to go in takingaccount <strong>of</strong> the labour <strong>and</strong> money expended in givingfertility ? In respect <strong>of</strong> newly enclosed tracts, someestimation may be made ; but in respect <strong>of</strong> thegreater part, long reduced to cultivation, I do not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!