My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org

My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org

wallace.online.org
from wallace.online.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

222 MY LIFEnot wait. The hypothesis is sublime in its simplicityand the wonderful manner in which it explains themost mysterious of the phenomena of life. To meit is satisfying in the extreme. I feel I can nevergive it up, unless it be positively disproved, which isimpossible, or replaced by one which better explainsthe facts, which is highly improbable. Darwin hashere decidedly gone ahead of Spencer in generalization.I consider it the most wonderful thing he hasgiven us, but it will not be generally appreciated."This was written when I was fresh from the spellof this most ingenious hypothesis. Galton's experimentson blood transfusion with rabbits first staggeredme, as it seemed to me to be the very disproof I hadthought impossible. And later on, when Weismannadduced his views on the continuity of the germplasm,and the consequent non-heredity of acquiredcharacters ; and further, when he showed that thesupposed transmission of such characters, whichDarwin had accepted and which the hypothesis ofpangenesis was constructed to account for, was notreally proved by ;— any evidence whatever I wascompelled to discard Darwin's view in favour of thatof Weismann, which is now almost everywhereaccepted as being the most probable, as well as beingthe most in accordance with all the facts and phenomenaof heredity.The subject on which Sir Charles Lyell andmyself had the longest discussions was that of theeffects of the glacial period on the distribution ofplants and animals, and on the origin of lake basins.On the question of the ice-origin of Alpine lakesI could never get him to accept my extreme views.In March, 1869, I received from him a letter ofthirteen pages, and another of thirty pages, on this

—LYELL AND DARWIN 223and allied questions, setting forth the reasons whyhe rejected ice action as having ground out the largerlakes, much as he states them in the fourth editionof "The Antiquity of Man." At page 361 he saysthat "the gravest objection to the hypothesis ofglacial erosion on a stupendous scale is afforded bythe entire absence of lakes of the first magnitudein several areas where they ought to exist, if theenormous glaciers which once occupied those spaceshad possessed the deep excavating power ascribedto them." He then goes on to adduce numerousplaces where he thinks there ought to have beenlakes on the glacier theory, which are the same ashe adduced in letters to myself, and which I answeredin each case, and sometimes at great length, bysimilar arguments to those I have adduced in vol. i.chap. V. of my "Studies, Scientific and Social." Ifany one who is interested in these questions, afterconsidering Sir Charles Lyell's difficulties and objectionsin his "Antiquity of Man," will read the abovechapter, giving special attention to the sectionsheaded The Conditions that favour the Production ofLakes by Ice-erosion, and the following section onObjections of Modern Writers considered, I think hewill, if he had paid any attention to the phenomenain glaciated regions, admit that I show the theoryof ice-erosion to be the only one that explains allthe facts.In a letter written on April 28, 1869, after referringto Darwin's regret at the concluding passages ofmy Quarterly Review article on "Man," which he"would have thought written by some one else," Iadd the following summary on my position, perhapsmore simply and forcibly stated than in any of mypublished works :

222 MY LIFEnot wait. The hypothesis is sublime in its simplicity<strong>and</strong> the wonderful manner in which it explains themost mysterious <strong>of</strong> the phenomena <strong>of</strong> <strong>life</strong>. To meit is satisfying in the extreme. I feel I can nevergive it up, unless it be positively disproved, which isimpossible, or replaced by one which better explainsthe facts, which is highly improbable. Darwin hashere decidedly gone ahead <strong>of</strong> Spencer in generalization.I consider it the most wonderful thing he hasgiven us, but it will not be generally appreciated."This was written when I was fresh from the spell<strong>of</strong> this most ingenious hypothesis. Galton's experimentson blood transfusion with rabbits first staggeredme, as it seemed to me to be the very dispro<strong>of</strong> I hadthought impossible. And later on, when Weismannadduced his views on the continuity <strong>of</strong> the germplasm,<strong>and</strong> the consequent non-heredity <strong>of</strong> acquiredcharacters ; <strong>and</strong> further, when he showed that thesupposed transmission <strong>of</strong> such characters, whichDarwin had accepted <strong>and</strong> which the hypothesis <strong>of</strong>pangenesis was constructed to account for, was notreally proved by ;— any evidence whatever I wascompelled to discard Darwin's view in favour <strong>of</strong> that<strong>of</strong> Weismann, which is now almost everywhereaccepted as being the most probable, as well as beingthe most in accordance with all the facts <strong>and</strong> phenomena<strong>of</strong> heredity.The subject on which Sir Charles Lyell <strong>and</strong>myself had the longest discussions was that <strong>of</strong> theeffects <strong>of</strong> the glacial period on the distribution <strong>of</strong>plants <strong>and</strong> animals, <strong>and</strong> on the origin <strong>of</strong> lake basins.On the question <strong>of</strong> the ice-origin <strong>of</strong> Alpine lakesI could never get him to accept my extreme views.In March, 1869, I received from him a letter <strong>of</strong>thirteen pages, <strong>and</strong> another <strong>of</strong> thirty pages, on this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!