My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org

My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org My life : a record of events and opinions - Wallace-online.org

wallace.online.org
from wallace.online.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

And190 MY LIFEsharp attack of intermittent fever, and every dayduring the cold and succeeding hot fits had to liedown for several hours, during which time I hadnothing to do but to think over any subjects thenparticularly interesting me. One day somethingbrought to my recollection Malthus's " Principles ofPopulation," which I had read about twelve yearsbefore. I thought of his clear exposition of "thepositive checks to increase " —disease, accidents, war,and famine—which keep down the population ofsavage races to so much lower an average than thatof more civilized peoples. It then occurred to methat these causes or their equivalents are continuallyacting in the case of animals also ; and as animalsusually breed much more rapidly than does mankind,the destruction every year from these causes must beenormous in order to keep down the numbers ofeach species, since they evidently do not increaseregularly from year to year, as otherwise the worldwould long ago have been densely crowded withthose that breed most quickly. Vaguely thinkingover the enormous and constant destruction whichthis implied, it occurred to me to ask the question..''Why do some die and some live the answerwas clearly, that on the whole the best fitted live.From the effects of disease the most healthy escaped ;from enemies, the strongest, the swiftest, or the mostcunning ;from famine, the best hunters or those withthe best digestion ;and so on. Then it suddenlyflashed upon me that this self-acting process wouldnecessarily improve the race, because in every generationthe inferior would inevitably be killed off and thesuperior would remain—that is, the fittest would survive.Then at once I seemed to see the whole effectof this, that when changes of land and sea, or of

THE MALAY ARCHIPELAGO 191climate, or of food-supply, or of enemies occurred—andwe know that such changes have always been takingplace—in conjunction with the amount of individualvariation that my experience as a collector had shownme to exist, then all the changes necessary for theadaptation of the species to the changing conditionswould be brought about ; and as great changes in theenvironment are always slow, there would be ampletime for the change to be effected by the survival ofthe best fitted in every generation. In this way eachpart of an animal's organization could be modifiedexactly as required, and in the very process of thismodification the unmodified would die out, and thusthe definite characters and the clear isolation of eachnew species would be explained. The more I thoughtover it the more I became convinced that I had atlength found the long-sought-for law of nature thatsolved the problem of the origin of species. For thenext hour I thought over the deficiencies in thetheories of Lamarck and of the author of the " Vestiges,"and I saw that my new theory supplementedthese views and obviatedevery important difficulty.I waited anxiously for the termination of my fit sothat Imight at once make notes for a paper on thesubject. The same evening I did this pretty fully,and on the two succeeding evenings wrote it outcarefully in order to send it to Darwin by the nextpost, which would leave in a day or two.I wrote a letter to him in which I said that Ihoped the idea would be as new to him as it was tome, and that it would supply the missing factor toexplain the origin of species. I asked him, if hethought it sufficiently important, to show it to SirCharles Lyell, who had thought so highly of myformer paper.

And190 MY LIFEsharp attack <strong>of</strong> intermittent fever, <strong>and</strong> every dayduring the cold <strong>and</strong> succeeding hot fits had to liedown for several hours, during which time I hadnothing to do but to think over any subjects thenparticularly interesting me. One day somethingbrought to my recollection Malthus's " Principles <strong>of</strong>Population," which I had read about twelve yearsbefore. I thought <strong>of</strong> his clear exposition <strong>of</strong> "thepositive checks to increase " —disease, accidents, war,<strong>and</strong> famine—which keep down the population <strong>of</strong>savage races to so much lower an average than that<strong>of</strong> more civilized peoples. It then occurred to methat these causes or their equivalents are continuallyacting in the case <strong>of</strong> animals also ; <strong>and</strong> as animalsusually breed much more rapidly than does mankind,the destruction every year from these causes must beenormous in order to keep down the numbers <strong>of</strong>each species, since they evidently do not increaseregularly from year to year, as otherwise the worldwould long ago have been densely crowded withthose that breed most quickly. Vaguely thinkingover the enormous <strong>and</strong> constant destruction whichthis implied, it occurred to me to ask the question..''Why do some die <strong>and</strong> some live the answerwas clearly, that on the whole the best fitted live.From the effects <strong>of</strong> disease the most healthy escaped ;from enemies, the strongest, the swiftest, or the mostcunning ;from famine, the best hunters or those withthe best digestion ;<strong>and</strong> so on. Then it suddenlyflashed upon me that this self-acting process wouldnecessarily improve the race, because in every generationthe inferior would inevitably be killed <strong>of</strong>f <strong>and</strong> thesuperior would remain—that is, the fittest would survive.Then at once I seemed to see the whole effect<strong>of</strong> this, that when changes <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> sea, or <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!