12.07.2015 Views

Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Preliminaries 4 2.1. Some results on ...

Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Preliminaries 4 2.1. Some results on ...

Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Preliminaries 4 2.1. Some results on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

81following diagram0Hom B (Y, Y ′ )Hom B (Y,ηY ′ )Hom B (Y, RLY ′ )K Y,Y ′K Y,RLY ′0HomC A (K ϕ Y, K ϕ Y ′ )Hom CA (K ϕY,K ϕηY ′ )HomC A (K ϕ Y, K ϕ RLY ′ )Hom B (Y,RLηY ′ )Hom B (Y,ηRLY ′ )Hom B (Y, RLRLY ′ )Hom CA (K ϕY,K ϕRLηY ′ )K Y,RLRLY ′Hom CA (K ϕY,K ϕηRLY ′ ) HomC A (K ϕ Y, K ϕ RLRLY ′ )Since (Y ′ , ηY ′ ) = Equ B (ηRLY ′ , RLηY ′ ) the left column of the diagram is exact byLemma <str<strong>on</strong>g>2.</str<strong>on</strong>g>17. By Lemma 4.65 we have (K ϕ Y, K ϕ ηY ) = EquC A (K ϕ ηRLY, K ϕ RLηY )so that also the right column is also exact by Lemma <str<strong>on</strong>g>2.</str<strong>on</strong>g>17. Let f ∈ Hom B (Y, Y ′ )and g ∈ Hom B (Y, RLY ′ ). SinceK ϕ (ηY ′ ◦ f) = (K ϕ ηY ′ ) ◦ (K ϕ f) ,K ϕ (ηRLY ′ ◦ g) = (K ϕ ηRLY ′ ) ◦ (K ϕ g) and K ϕ (RLηY ′ ◦ g) = (K ϕ RLηY ′ ) ◦ (K ϕ g)the diagram is serially commutative. By Propositi<strong>on</strong> 4.66, K Y,RLY ′ and K Y,RLRLY ′are isomorphisms and so is K Y,Y ′ by Lemma <str<strong>on</strong>g>2.</str<strong>on</strong>g>15. □Corollary 4.69 (Beck’s Theorem for com<strong>on</strong>ads). Let (L, R) be an adjuncti<strong>on</strong>where L : B → A and R : A → B. Then K = Υ (Id LR ) : B → LR A is full andfaithful if and <strong>on</strong>ly if for every Y ∈ B we have that (Y, ηY ) = Equ B (ηRLY, RLηY ) .5.<str<strong>on</strong>g>1.</str<strong>on</strong>g> Distributive laws.5. Liftings and distributive lawsDefiniti<strong>on</strong> 5.<str<strong>on</strong>g>1.</str<strong>on</strong>g> Let A = (A, m, u) be a m<strong>on</strong>ad and C = (C, ∆, ε) be a com<strong>on</strong>ad<strong>on</strong> the same category A. A functorial morphism Φ : AC → CA is called a mixeddistributive law (or in some papers an entwining) if• Φ ◦ (mC) = (Cm) ◦ (ΦA) ◦ (AΦ) and Φ ◦ (uC) = Cu• (∆A) ◦ Φ = (CΦ) ◦ (ΦC) ◦ (A∆) and (εA) ◦ Φ = Aε.Definiti<strong>on</strong> 5.<str<strong>on</strong>g>2.</str<strong>on</strong>g> Let A = (A, m, u) be a m<strong>on</strong>ad and C = (C, ∆, ε) be a com<strong>on</strong>ad<strong>on</strong> the same category A. A functorial morphism Ψ : CA → AC is called an oppositemixed distributive law if• Ψ ◦ (Cm) = (mC) ◦ (AΨ) ◦ (ΨA) and Ψ ◦ (Cu) = uC• (A∆) ◦ Ψ = (ΨC) ◦ (CΨ) ◦ (∆A) and (Aε) ◦ Ψ = εA.Lemma 5.3. Let A = (A, m A , u A ) be a m<strong>on</strong>ad and let C = ( C, ∆ C , ε C) be a com<strong>on</strong>ad<strong>on</strong> the category A. Let Q : B → A be a functor such that ( Q, A µ Q)is left A-module functor. Assume that Φ : AC → CA is a mixed distributive law. Then(CQ, A µ CQ)=(CQ,(C A µ Q)◦ (ΦQ))is a left A-module functor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!