12.07.2015 Views

The Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2063 (2007) - Digital Himalaya

The Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2063 (2007) - Digital Himalaya

The Interim Constitution of Nepal, 2063 (2007) - Digital Himalaya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE INTERIM CONSTITUTION OF NEPAL, <strong>2063</strong> (<strong>2007</strong>)AS AMENDED BY THE FIRST TO SIXTH AMENDMENTSAn <strong>Interim</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong> Drafting Committee was formed in June 2006, chaired byretired Supreme Court Justice Laxman Aryal. Originally it comprised 7 prominentlawyers, including former presidents <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Nepal</strong> Bar Association. When it wasrealized that 5 <strong>of</strong> these were male Brahmins, the Committee was expanded to bringin a few women, and members put forward by the various parties including theMaoists. It clearly found its work very difficult. <strong>The</strong> first draft that was made containedmany incomplete provisions, or provisions with alternatives, many <strong>of</strong> them showingclear signs <strong>of</strong> Maoist conceptions <strong>of</strong> government – including severe undermining <strong>of</strong>the independence <strong>of</strong> the judiciary, and the placing <strong>of</strong> excessive powers in the hands<strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Ministers. Maoist contributions to the draft included the stress onland reform, which survives into the final version. Another sign <strong>of</strong> the difficulty <strong>of</strong>the task was the considerable extent to which the <strong>Interim</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong> DraftingCommittee had recourse to the 1990 <strong>Constitution</strong>.Although about 5000 submissions were made to the <strong>Interim</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong> DraftingCommittee from various civil society groups, it is not known whether they were evenread. <strong>The</strong> changes that were made from the 1990 <strong>Constitution</strong> did however reflectthe concerns <strong>of</strong> those calling for inclusion, most notably in some new directiveprinciples, and in the provisions for the Constituent Assembly. Also some newfundamental rights are to be found, some <strong>of</strong> which were formerly in the directiveprinciples chapter. And the state is to be secular, no longer a Hindu kingdom. <strong>The</strong>position <strong>of</strong> the monarchy was placed on ice, as it were. Previously kingly functionsare now given to the Speaker or to the Prime Minister. But the third amendment tothe <strong>Interim</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong>, in December <strong>2007</strong>, took the further step <strong>of</strong> saying that<strong>Nepal</strong> is to be a republic, and this is to be implemented by the first sitting <strong>of</strong> theConstituent Assembly. <strong>The</strong> fourth amendment declared <strong>Nepal</strong> to be a federaldemocratic republic, created the post <strong>of</strong> president as head <strong>of</strong> state, a vice-presidentand a national trust to which royal property is to be transferred. <strong>The</strong> fifth amendmentintroduces the requirements <strong>of</strong> political consensus for the election <strong>of</strong> president, a2/3 majority to amend the interim constitution, recognition <strong>of</strong> the aspirations <strong>of</strong>indigenous and backward communities for autonomous regions, local self governingbodies and for social inclusion in the army.<strong>The</strong> basics <strong>of</strong> the existing governmental, parliamentary, system remain. However,there is no longer a second house <strong>of</strong> parliament, but most <strong>of</strong> its members (other thanroyal nominees) are merged into the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives. While the <strong>Interim</strong><strong>Constitution</strong> was being drafted, negotiations with the Maoists were proceeding,and a Comprehensive Peace Agreement was signed in November 2006. Thisagreement meant that there had to be provision for nominated Maoist members <strong>of</strong>the house. At the same time 48 other new members were to be nominated, ostensiblyto broaden the membership, though in the end the parties mostly brought in people<strong>of</strong> the old rather than a new mould. <strong>The</strong> interim nature <strong>of</strong> the arrangements is alsosignified by the insistence that decision making is to be by consensus, including theselection <strong>of</strong> the Prime Minister. This was carried to the extent that there was noprovision for a vote <strong>of</strong> no confidence in the government. This was changed in thesecond amendment in June <strong>2007</strong>. <strong>The</strong> same amendment introduced a recognition <strong>of</strong>the opposition – another change that perhaps hints at a weakening consensus.8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!