12.07.2015 Views

Flexibility in timing of molting of fiddler crab ... - Inter Research

Flexibility in timing of molting of fiddler crab ... - Inter Research

Flexibility in timing of molting of fiddler crab ... - Inter Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mar Ecol Prog Ser 146: 55-60, 1997E4l-day3-dayIn the laboratory, the presence <strong>of</strong> muffled marsh sediment~had no effect on tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> molt<strong>in</strong>g (Mann-WhitneyU-test, p = 0.43). The median day <strong>of</strong> molt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>megalopae <strong>in</strong> dishes with FSW was 12 0 (mean = 13.8,SD = 6.9), and <strong>in</strong> dishes with both FSW and muffledsediment it was 12.5 d (mean = 14.6, SD = 10.1). Thissuggests that the muffled sediments did not provide atactile cue for molt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the field.MuffledSediment TypeFreshFig. 2. Uca pugnax. Proportion (mean i SD) <strong>of</strong> <strong>fiddler</strong> <strong>crab</strong>megalopae molt<strong>in</strong>g to first <strong>crab</strong> stage with<strong>in</strong> marsh (Spart<strong>in</strong>aalterniflora) habitats dur<strong>in</strong>g 2 field deployments. Althoughproportion molt<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the l-day deployment did not differbetween sediment treatments, the proportion molt<strong>in</strong>gwith<strong>in</strong> 5 replicate cages dur<strong>in</strong>g the 3-day deployment wassignificantly greater (ANOVA on arcs<strong>in</strong>e-transformed data,F,,, = 53.95, p < 0.001) for sediment freshly collected fromnearby <strong>fiddler</strong> <strong>crab</strong> burrows than similar sediment that hadbeen previously combusted <strong>in</strong> a muffle furnace (2 to 3 h at550 to 600°C). Survivorship <strong>of</strong> ~ndividuals was greater than90% dur<strong>in</strong>g both deploymentsDays S<strong>in</strong>ce Experiment BeganFig. 3. Uca pugnax. Cumulative molt<strong>in</strong>g frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>fiddler</strong><strong>crab</strong> megalopae ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the laboratory without fieldcues. Sixteen 6-day-old megalopae from the same broods utlllzedIn the field expenment were scored daily for numbermoltlng to <strong>crab</strong> 1, commenc<strong>in</strong>g with ~nitiation <strong>of</strong> the 3-daydeployment. The correspond~ng mean molt<strong>in</strong>g percentage Inthe field dur<strong>in</strong>g the 3-day deployment is <strong>in</strong>dicated by 'F'(fresh sediment) and 'M' (muffled sediment)lopae molted to the first <strong>crab</strong> stage, which is comparableto the percentage molt<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g the 3-day period<strong>of</strong> exposure to natural cues <strong>in</strong> the field.Megalopae ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the laboratory molted farmore slo~vly than their sibl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the field. At the end<strong>of</strong> the 3-day field deployment, none <strong>of</strong> the specimens<strong>in</strong> the lab had molted to the first <strong>crab</strong> stage (Fig. 3).Even 1 wk after the field experiment ended, only 19%<strong>of</strong> the megalopae <strong>in</strong> the lab had molted.DISCUSSIONOur short-term field experiment provides strong evidencethat natural cues greatly affect metamorphosis(molt<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>of</strong> <strong>crab</strong> megalopae, by <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g molt<strong>in</strong>gbetween 1 and 3 d after <strong>in</strong>itial exposure. Both naturalseawater overly<strong>in</strong>g a marsh and natural marsh sedimentsdramatically affected tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> molt<strong>in</strong>g, comparedto molt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> sibl<strong>in</strong>g megalopae ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>the laboratory. In fact, the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the response,as <strong>in</strong>dicated by proportion rnolt<strong>in</strong>g, was greater thanthat seen <strong>in</strong> laboratory experiments (O'Connor 1991,O'Connor & Gregg unpubl.). However, Christy (1989)also observed that sediments collected adjacent toadult burrows stimulated substantially earlier molt<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> Uca pugilator megalopae <strong>in</strong> the lab. The dramaticresponse <strong>of</strong> larvae to cues <strong>in</strong> the field compared withmolt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> sibl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the lab (Fig. 3) strongly suggeststhat larvae <strong>in</strong> the lab were <strong>in</strong> fact delaylng metamorphosis(Pechenik 1990), rather than simply develop<strong>in</strong>gat a slower rate. Even though daytime air temperatures<strong>in</strong> the field became rather high, average water temperaturewas similar to that <strong>in</strong> which megalopae <strong>in</strong> thelaboratory were ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. Therefore, temperaturedifferences between the laboratory and the field werenot great, and probably did not accelerate molt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>rnegalopae <strong>in</strong> the field.The question arises as to the identity <strong>of</strong> the cues <strong>in</strong>nature. Two types <strong>of</strong> cues were important <strong>in</strong> stimulat<strong>in</strong>gmolt<strong>in</strong>g: cues <strong>in</strong> the water and cues associated withbenthic sediments. Water-soluble cues could havebeen derived from benthic sediments, marsh grass, oradult <strong>fiddler</strong> <strong>crab</strong>s <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g the marsh. Marsh grass isan unlikely cue, based on test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> leachates fromSpart<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> the laboratory (O'Connor & Greggunpubl.). It is likely that soluble cues from either conspecificadults or natural marsh sedirnents, or both,were effective <strong>in</strong> stimulat<strong>in</strong>g molt<strong>in</strong>g. In laboratorystudies, cues derived from adult <strong>crab</strong>s significantlyaffect tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> molt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>fiddler</strong> <strong>crab</strong> larvae (Christy1989, O'Connor 1991, O'Connor & Gregg unpubl.). Inaddition, substances associated with natural marshsedirnents, rather than sediment particles themselves,may represent a contact-dependent cue for megalopae.Sediments without natural organisms and mole-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!