Trust Board papers - University Hospital Southampton NHS ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2.2. Information to support patientsMy health record(HealthVault)Two pathways (IBD and gestational diabetes) are live on the system.Clinical staff are actively recruiting patients and various ways are beingexplored to encourage take-up. The system is technically proven.Development resources are currently directed at general outpatientsfunctions such as appointments management, where it is felt the trustcan start to scale up users quickly into large numbers. At this point thefocus will start to concentrate on engaging patients in some of thetransactional activity i.e. data entry in forms.2.3. Information to support managersInformationstrategyQlikview projectAlthough the information strategy is directed to serve all staff groupsand purposes it has been reported under an information for managersheading.The information manager, Richard Brooker, has been communicatingthe strategy with divisional teams via one-to-one meetings, caregroups and divisional boards.The feedback is being used to inform the future direction for theQlikview development, which is the strategic tool for delivery ofinformation to the desktop.A steering group is to be set up, chaired by the director ofperformance.A working system is now available for demonstration and comprisesdashboards for ED and RTT data. The development times of theinformation and the ability to provide refreshed and up-to-dateinformation are proving that the product is a good fit with what the trustwishes to achieve.Following the current round of demonstrations, and the steering groupbeing set up, a development and roll out plan will be published.2.4. InfrastructureIntegrationplatformDesktop productsNetwork upgradeThe scoring has been completed and the technical preferred producthas been identified. This must be in place to complete the interfacesfor the new PACS system.Licences have been an issue with Microsoft since the breakup of theenterprise agreement (EWA) in 2010. Discussions are on-going butUHS has stabilized its current position with regard to use. A session isplanned for a trust board study session to demonstrate the newcapabilities such as messaging and video conferencing. This will beused to inform assessment of future business cases.In order to achieve best value for future network developments, theplan to upgrade both the wired and wireless network, plus firewallproducts, has been included in the service renew for the overallnetwork support. This is currently out for reprocurement under OJEU.4
2.5. RiskThere are no critical (16+) risks in the IM&T register currently, and none that are significantlyincreasing. Oracle licences are in the same round of negotiations as those for Microsoft,being also subject to an EWA that will expire in 2014. This however is being mitigated bydiscussions currently and the score will be revised downwards following indications of apositive outcome. It is currently felt the level of exposure can be handled within existingIM&T plans.2.6. ReliabilityThe IM&T department has had one significant outage in this period. The pathology databasesuffered a problem that caused it to shut down on 13 th November. This was supported bythe supplier (Clinisys) for the afternoon and overnight, when staff from IT and pathology(pathology IT manager) were also working on the problem. The system was out of action foraround 12 hours during which time electronic orders were not being passed to the system.The analysers were carrying out the work but urgent results had to be phoned. Messagequeues took most of the following day to catch up.Investigations by IT and the supplier have not indicated what caused the problem, but somerecommendations have been made about monitoring, which will be acted upon.The pathology system is a very reliable platform and the data showed that the hardware hadbeen “up” for more than 400 days without a reboot since the last scheduled maintenance.Pathology and IT will consider however whether more frequent scheduled re-boots would bebeneficial.3. Next Steps / Way Forward3.1. The main pieces of work in the next period are as followsEPMAComplete the adult roll out and plan for paediatrics. Hand over tooperational working. Plan for decision support developmentsDWLDevelopment of the multi-professional patient treatment managerEDMBusiness case to be presented to TECAcuity system Business case is expected to TEC in Feb 2013 (not IM&T)PACSContracts will be signed and installation will be in full flow. Level ofconfidence is proposed dates will be firmed up as tasks are completed.PathologyA procurement exercise is expected to startInformationstrategyA steering group for this piece of work and a plan for delivery. Somelive use of the Qlikview system.IntegrationplatformDesktop productsNetwork upgradeStrategycommunicationProcurement of the new platform will be completeA session will be set up for trust board study session as a part ofdemonstrating the “future hospital”Procurement of a new network support contractA trust board study session is being arranged (Jan) to discuss the itemraised at the IM&T strategy presentation to board regarding theoptions for IM&T spend (less/more). This will be supported by thesession including Microsoft looking at future technologies.4. Recommendation4.1. That trust board notes the progress on the IM&T strategy and work plan.5
Page 3:
UHSFT - Directors’ Actions Summar
Page 8 and 9:
172/12 b) A discussion followed cov
Page 10 and 11:
176/12 b) A discussion followed cov
Page 12 and 13:
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS
Page 14 and 15:
Worked wtes rose by 105 in November
Page 16 and 17:
) Delivering an in-year financial s
Page 18 and 19:
FINANCE REPORTSchedule 1 2012/13 Mo
Page 20 and 21:
Schedule 2bINCOME & EXPENDITURE FOR
Page 22 and 23:
Schedule 4Central and Divisional Re
Page 24 and 25:
Schedule 6DIVISIONAL/HEADQUARTERS P
Page 26 and 27:
Schedule 7CIPS BEING WORKED OotalDi
Page 28 and 29:
Schedule 8b 2012/13 Month: 8Univers
Page 30 and 31:
Schedule 10Finance Risk Indicators:
Page 32 and 33:
Annex 2DIVISIONAL/HEADQUARTERS INCO
Page 34 and 35:
Annex 4CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2012/13
Page 36 and 37: Trust Board ReportTITLEFRIENDS AND
Page 38 and 39: 2.3 Other Guidance ReceivedThe DOH
Page 40 and 41: 3.0 Scope of the ProjectThere are 4
Page 42 and 43: 8.0 Project BudgetDoH anticipated a
Page 44 and 45: Roll out to wards/departmentsdevelo
Page 46 and 47: Trust Board PaperTitleQuarterly Pat
Page 48 and 49: 2 SECTION 1: What Patients are Tell
Page 50 and 51: 2.2 Complaints and ConcernsIt is po
Page 52 and 53: Actions in the reporting quarter In
Page 54 and 55: 3.1 Nutrition3.1.1 MUST Screening a
Page 56 and 57: The Clinical accreditation Scheme (
Page 58 and 59: 1 Purpose1.1 The UHS patient qualit
Page 60 and 61: DRAFT UHS Patient Improvement Frame
Page 62 and 63: 2012/13 PIF (For Reference)Appendix
Page 64 and 65: Board Paper Cover SheetTitleChief E
Page 66 and 67: 4. Signing & Sealing4.1 The Seal of
Page 68 and 69: performance target and C-Diff targe
Page 70 and 71: University Hospital Southampton NHS
Page 72 and 73: Appendix 2Exception Reports - Novem
Page 74 and 75: Monthly MeasuresPatient ExperienceH
Page 84 and 85: IM&T Report - Nov 20121. Purpose1.1
show all

Trust Board papers - University Hospital Southampton NHS ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?